Literature DB >> 34669087

Above- and belowground biomass allocation and its regulation by plant density in six common grassland species in China.

Yuanfeng Sun1, Yupin Wang1, Zhengbing Yan2, Luoshu He1, Suhui Ma1, Yuhao Feng1, Haojie Su1, Guoping Chen1, Yinping Feng3, Chengjun Ji1, Haihua Shen3, Jingyun Fang4,5.   

Abstract

Above- and belowground biomass allocation is an essential plant functional trait that reflects plant survival strategies and affects belowground carbon pool estimation in grasslands. However, due to the difficulty of distinguishing living and dead roots, estimation of biomass allocation from field-based studies currently show large uncertainties. In addition, the dependence of biomass allocation on plant species, functional type as well as plant density remains poorly addressed. Here, we conducted greenhouse manipulation experiments to study above- and belowground biomass allocation and its density regulation for six common grassland species with different functional types (i.e., C3 vs C4; annuals vs perennials) from temperate China. To explore the density regulation on the biomass allocation, we used five density levels: 25, 100, 225, 400, and 625 plant m-2. We found that mean root to shoot ratio (R/S) values ranged from 0.04 to 0.92 across the six species, much lower than those obtained in previous field studies. We also found much lower R/S values in annuals than in perennials (C. glaucum and S. viridis vs C. squarrosa, L. chinensis, M. sativa and S. grandis) and in C4 plants than in C3 plants (C. squarrosa vs L. chinensis, M. sativa and S. grandis). In addition to S. grandis, plant density had significant effects on the shoot and root biomass fraction and R/S for the other five species. Plant density also affected the allometric relationships between above- and belowground biomass significantly. Our results suggest that R/S values obtained from field investigations may be severely overestimated and that R/S values vary largely across species with different functional types. Our findings provide novel insights into approximating the difficult-to-measure belowground living biomass in grasslands, and highlight that species composition and intraspecific competition will regulate belowground carbon estimation.
© 2021. The Botanical Society of Japan.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allometry; Biomass allocation; Density; Grassland; Plant functional type; R/S

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34669087     DOI: 10.1007/s10265-021-01353-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plant Res        ISSN: 0918-9440            Impact factor:   2.629


  21 in total

1.  Global allocation rules for patterns of biomass partitioning in seed plants.

Authors:  Brian J Enquist; Karl J Niklas
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-02-22       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control.

Authors:  Hendrik Poorter; Karl J Niklas; Peter B Reich; Jacek Oleksyn; Pieter Poot; Liesje Mommer
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 3.  The origins of C4 grasslands: integrating evolutionary and ecosystem science.

Authors:  Erika J Edwards; Colin P Osborne; Caroline A E Strömberg; Stephen A Smith; William J Bond; Pascal-Antoine Christin; Asaph B Cousins; Melvin R Duvall; David L Fox; Robert P Freckleton; Oula Ghannoum; James Hartwell; Yongsong Huang; Christine M Janis; Jon E Keeley; Elizabeth A Kellogg; Alan K Knapp; Andrew D B Leakey; David M Nelson; Jeffery M Saarela; Rowan F Sage; Osvaldo E Sala; Nicolas Salamin; Christopher J Still; Brett Tipple
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Evolutionary history resolves global organization of root functional traits.

Authors:  Zeqing Ma; Dali Guo; Xingliang Xu; Mingzhen Lu; Richard D Bardgett; David M Eissenstat; M Luke McCormack; Lars O Hedin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Above-ground competition does not alter biomass allocated to roots in Abutilon theophrasti.

Authors:  Brenda B Casper; James F Cahill; Laura A Hyatt
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 10.151

6.  Drought effect on plant biomass allocation: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anwar Eziz; Zhengbing Yan; Di Tian; Wenxuan Han; Zhiyao Tang; Jingyun Fang
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-11-12       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Atmosphere, ecology and evolution: what drove the Miocene expansion of C(4) grasslands?

Authors:  Colin P Osborne
Journal:  J Ecol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 6.256

8.  Patterns of plant biomass allocation in temperate grasslands across a 2500-km transect in northern China.

Authors:  Wentao Luo; Yong Jiang; Xiaotao Lü; Xue Wang; Mai-He Li; Edith Bai; Xingguo Han; Zhuwen Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Allometric biomass partitioning under nitrogen enrichment: Evidence from manipulative experiments around the world.

Authors:  Yunfeng Peng; Yuanhe Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Sowing Density: A Neglected Factor Fundamentally Affecting Root Distribution and Biomass Allocation of Field Grown Spring Barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.).

Authors:  Vera L Hecht; Vicky M Temperton; Kerstin A Nagel; Uwe Rascher; Johannes A Postma
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.