Literature DB >> 34669058

Gender differences in primary mitral regurgitant volumes at specific regurgitant fractions as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging.

Chad M House1,2, Min Xi3, Katie A Moriarty4,5,6, William B Nelson4,5,6.   

Abstract

Guidelines suggest using a regurgitant fraction of 50% and regurgitant volume of 60 ml for determination of severe mitral insufficiency. Recent MRI data has suggested that a regurgitant fraction of 40% defines severe primary mitral insufficiency. We sought to determine whether there were gender differences in primary mitral regurgitant volumes for regurgitant fractions of 40% and 50%. A database search identified 394 patients that had MRI with a mitral regurgitant volume ≥ 10 ml or a study indication of mitral insufficiency. Chart review identified 97 patients with primary mitral insufficiency. Of these patients, 53 (54%) were women. Men had significantly larger left ventricular volumes, myocardial mass, stroke volumes and mitral regurgitant volumes (37 ± 25 ml vs. 24 ± 12 ml). The difference in regurgitant fraction between genders was not significant (27 ± 14% vs. 24 ± 11%; p-value = 0.24). Regurgitant fraction and regurgitant volume had a strong linear correlation in both men (r = .95) and women (r = .92). Despite similar linear correlations, the slope-intercept equations differed significantly between men and women (p < .001). A regurgitant fraction of 40% correlated with a regurgitant volume of 59 ml in men and 39.5 ml in women, while a regurgitant fraction of 50% correlated with a regurgitant volume of 76.2 ml in men and 49.6 ml in women. Regurgitant fraction, determined by cardiac MRI, provides a gender independent assessment of primary mitral insufficiency, and suggests that regurgitant volume thresholds for severe primary mitral insufficiency may be lower in women.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gender; Magnetic resonance imaging; Mitral insufficiency; Regurgitant fraction; Regurgitant volume

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34669058     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-021-02449-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  3 in total

1.  Gender differences in mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Joerg Seeburger; Sandra Eifert; Bettina Pfannmüller; Jens Garbade; Marcel Vollroth; Martin Misfeld; Michael Borger; Friedrich Wilhelm Mohr
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Catherine M Otto; Rick A Nishimura; Robert O Bonow; Blase A Carabello; John P Erwin; Federico Gentile; Hani Jneid; Eric V Krieger; Michael Mack; Christopher McLeod; Patrick T O'Gara; Vera H Rigolin; Thoralf M Sundt; Annemarie Thompson; Christopher Toly
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols: 2020 update.

Authors:  Christopher M Kramer; Jörg Barkhausen; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; Scott D Flamm; Raymond J Kim; Eike Nagel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 5.364

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.