| Literature DB >> 34668767 |
Antoine Berry1,2, Sandie Menard1, Sandrine E Nsango3,4, Luc Abate5, Didier Concordet6, Majoline Tchioffo Tsapi5, Xavier Iriart1,2, Parfait H Awono-Ambéné7, Benjamin Roche5,8,9, Isabelle Morlais5.
Abstract
The emergence of resistance to antimalarials has prompted the steady switch to novel therapies for decades. Withdrawal of antimalarials, such as chloroquine in sub-Saharan Africa in the late 1990s, led to rapid declines in the prevalence of resistance markers after a few years, raising the possibility of reintroducing them for malaria treatment. Here, we provide evidence that the mosquito vector plays a crucial role in maintaining parasite genetic diversity. We followed the transmission dynamics of Plasmodium falciparum parasites through its vector in natural infections from gametocytes contained in the blood of asymptomatic volunteers until sporozoites subsequently developed in the mosquito salivary glands. We did not find any selection of the mutant or wild-type pfcrt 76 allele during development in the Anopheles mosquito vector. However, microsatellite genotyping indicated that minority genotypes were favored during transmission through the mosquito. The analysis of changes in the proportions of mutant and wild-type pfcrt 76 alleles showed that, regardless of the genotype, the less-represented allele in the gametocyte population was more abundant in mosquito salivary glands, indicating a selective advantage of the minority allele in the vector. Selection of minority genotypes in the vector would explain the persistence of drug-resistant alleles in the absence of drug pressure in areas with high malaria endemicity and high genetic diversity. Our results may have important epidemiological implications, as they predict the rapid re-emergence and spread of resistant genotypes if antimalarials that had previously selected resistant parasites are reintroduced for malaria prevention or treatment. IMPORTANCE Drug selection pressure in malaria patients is the cause of the emergence of resistant parasites. Resistance imposes a fitness cost for parasites in untreated infections, so withdrawal of the drug leads to the return of susceptible parasites. Little is known about the role of the malaria vector in this phenomenon. In an experimental study conducted in Cameroon, an area of high malaria transmission, we showed that the vector did not favor the parasites based on sensitivity or resistance criteria, but it did favor the selection of minority clones. This finding shows that the vector increases the diversity of plasmodial populations and could play an important role in falciparum malaria epidemiology by maintaining resistant clones despite the absence of therapeutic pressure.Entities:
Keywords: Anopheles; Plasmodium falciparum; antimalarials; genetic diversity; malaria; mosquito; resistance; transmission
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34668767 PMCID: PMC8528099 DOI: 10.1128/Spectrum.00852-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiol Spectr ISSN: 2165-0497
FIG 1Box plot of mutant pfcrt 76 alleles in gametocyte and sporozoite samples. The dots represent the observed proportions of mutant pfcrt 76 alleles in the gametocyte samples and the observed average proportions of mutant pfcrt 76 alleles in the sporozoite samples. Box plots represent the median, 25th, and 75th percentiles and the minimum and maximum.
FIG 2Dispersion of the proportions of mutant pfcrt 76 alleles in gametocyte samples and in paired sporozoite samples. The dots represent the observed proportion of mutant pfcrt 76 alleles in each sporozoite sample against the observed proportion of mutant pfcrt 76 alleles in the paired gametocyte sample. The blue line represents the expected and theoretical distribution of dots if the vector has no influence in the transmission of pfcrt 76 alleles. The dot size is weighted by the number of samples.
FIG 3Logistic regression of the probability of a higher proportion of mutant pfcrt 76 alleles in sporozoite samples as a function of the proportion of mutant pfcrt 76 alleles in gametocyte samples. The proportion of mutant pfcrt 76 alleles in sporozoite samples was compared to that in the paired gametocyte samples. The probability of having a higher proportion of mutant pfcrt 76 alleles in sporozoite samples was calculated for each gametocyte sample using a logistic regression; the donor effect was taken into account. This probability (expressed as a percentage) as a function of the proportion of mutant pfcrt 76 alleles in gametocyte samples was plotted (red line). The blue line represents the expected probability if the variation of the proportion of mutant pfcrt 76 alleles in sporozoite samples is randomly distributed (50% of a higher proportion and 50% of a lower proportion). By symmetry, the result was identical for the wild-type allele (see Fig. S3).
FIG 4Distribution of the increase in the frequency of parasites with mutant pfcrt 76 alleles between the gametocyte and sporozoite stages for experimental infections where the proportion of parasites harboring the considered allele did not exceed 20% at the gametocyte stage. The comparison of the proportion of mutant pfcrt 76 alleles was restricted to experimental feedings where gametocyte samples had a proportion of mutant pfcrt alleles below 20%, defining these parasites as a minority variant. The difference of proportions between the gametocyte and sporozoite stages was computed, where a positive value meant an increase in the proportion of parasites with the mutant pfcrt allele at the sporozoite stage. The dashed line represents the average of this increase.
Results of the most-parsimonious generalized linear model explaining the increase in the frequency of pfcrt 76 mutant alleles between the gametocyte and sporozoite stages
| Parameter | Coefficient | |
|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 9.579 | 1.41e−4 |
| Gametocytemia | 0.046 | 4.49e−6 |
| Oocyst count | −0.331 | 0.016 |
| MOI | −6.692 | 5.68e−5 |
The results of the most-parsimonious generalized linear model explaining the increase in the frequency of pfcrt 76 mutant alleles between the gametocyte and sporozoite stages where the percentage of parasites harboring pfcrt 76 mutant alleles does not exceed 20% at the gametocyte stage. MOI, multiplicity of infection in the gametocyte population.
Allele distribution in the gametocyte or sporozoite samples for each microsatellite locus
| Microsatellite locus | Type of sample | Number of observed alleles for the considered allele | χ² test | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.707 |
| Gameto | 5 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 0 | 9 | 25 | 17 | 19 | 15 | 14 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Sporo | 4 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 26 | 19 | 19 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| P24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 192 | 0.359 | |||||
| Gameto | 0 | 15 | 25 | 25 | 18 | 9 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | |||||||
| Sporo | 2 | 11 | 21 | 25 | 24 | 18 | 13 | 6 | 13 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 2 | |||||||
| P21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.973 | |||||||||
| Gameto | 3 | 1 | 26 | 16 | 5 | 24 | 14 | 3 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Sporo | 3 | 3 | 31 | 19 | 5 | 29 | 17 | 5 | 2 | |||||||||||
| P23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.780 | ||||||||||||
| Gameto | 6 | 21 | 42 | 3 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Sporo | 7 | 30 | 45 | 5 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| P26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.468 | |||
| Gameto | 2 | 33 | 27 | 3 | 1 | 23 | 22 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Sporo | 3 | 33 | 32 | 3 | 3 | 26 | 26 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | |||||
| P22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.671 | |||||||
| Gameto | 0 | 1 | 11 | 9 | 29 | 21 | 13 | 17 | 3 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||
| Sporo | 1 | 1 | 14 | 7 | 29 | 21 | 14 | 21 | 0 | 8 | 3 | |||||||||
| P25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.746 | |||||||||
| Gameto | 1 | 1 | 14 | 17 | 29 | 11 | 17 | 7 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Sporo | 6 | 5 | 10 | 19 | 36 | 13 | 17 | 11 | 5 | |||||||||||
Gameto, gametocyte samples; Sporo, sporozoite samples. The text in bold corresponds to all the alleles observed for the considered microsatellite locus.
FIG 5Frequencies of newly detected alleles and nondetected alleles in paired sporozoites for each feeding as a function of microsatellites (x axis). The allelic composition in sporozoite samples was compared to that in their paired gametocyte samples. Each bar represents the newly detected (frequency of >0%) or the nondetected (frequency of <0%) alleles in sporozoite samples for each paired gametocyte sample. The table shows, for each microsatellite, the frequency of newly detected or nondetected alleles in all sporozoite samples compared to their frequency in the paired gametocyte samples.