Literature DB >> 34668577

Real-World Data of Palbociclib in Combination With Endocrine Therapy for the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer in Men.

Albert L Kraus1, Michelle Yu-Kite2, Jack Mardekian3, Matthew J Cotter3, Sindy Kim2, Jaclyn Decembrino4, Tamara Snow5, Kenneth R Carson5, Jillian Motyl Rockland5, Anala Gossai5, Keith Wilner3, Diane D Wang2, Cynthia Huang Bartlett6, Norihiko Oharu1, Patrick Schnell3, Todd VanArsdale2, Dongrui R Lu2, Jennifer M Tursi7.   

Abstract

This report examined the benefits and risks of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) in men with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Palbociclib was evaluated using three independent data sources: real-world data from pharmacy and medical claims, a de-identified real-world data source derived from electronic health records (EHRs), and a global safety database. From medical and pharmacy records, 1,139 men with MBC were identified; in the first-line setting, median duration of treatment was longer with palbociclib plus ET (n = 37, 8.5 months, 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.4-13.0) than ET alone (n = 214, 4.3 months, 95% CI, 3.0-5.7) and specifically, was longer with palbociclib plus letrozole (n = 26, 9.4 months, 95% CI, 4.4-14.0) than letrozole alone (n = 63, 3.0 months, 95% CI, 1.8-4.8). In the EHR-derived database, 59 men received treatment for MBC; real-world response across all lines of therapy in the metastatic setting was reported in 4 of 12 patients (33.3%) in the palbociclib plus ET group vs. 1 of 8 (12.5%) patients in the ET group. Review of the global safety database did not identify any new safety signals in palbociclib-treated men. Real-world data indicated that men with MBC benefit from palbociclib plus ET, with a safety profile consistent with previous observations in women with MBC. Collective data on palbociclib in women and men in this report, including clinical trial data, real-world data, and a well-established risk/benefit profile, led to US approval of an expansion of the palbociclib indication to include men with MBC.
© 2021 Pfizer Inc. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics © 2021 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34668577     DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  5 in total

Review 1.  Integrating real-world data to accelerate and guide drug development: A clinical pharmacology perspective.

Authors:  Xiaochen Zhao; Shahed Iqbal; Ivelisse L Valdes; Mark Dresser; Sandhya Girish
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2022-08-07       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 2.  The Role of CDK Pathway Dysregulation and Its Therapeutic Potential in Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

Authors:  Johannes Tobias Thiel; Adrien Daigeler; Jonas Kolbenschlag; Katarzyna Rachunek; Sebastian Hoffmann
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 3.  An Update on the General Features of Breast Cancer in Male Patients-A Literature Review.

Authors:  Sinziana Ionescu; Alin Codrut Nicolescu; Marian Marincas; Octavia-Luciana Madge; Laurentiu Simion
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-26

4.  Analysis of Factors Hindering the Dissemination of Medical Information Standards.

Authors:  Masami Mukai; Katsuhiko Ogasawara
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-04

5.  Rationale, Strengths, and Limitations of Real-World Evidence in Oncology: A Canadian Review and Perspective.

Authors:  Laurent Azoulay
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 5.837

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.