Literature DB >> 34666633

Costs of opioid overdose education and naloxone distribution in New York City.

Czarina N Behrends1, Sarah Gutkind2, Emily Winkelstein3, Monique Wright3, Jennifer Dolatshahi3, Alice Welch3, Denise Paone3, Hillary V Kunins3, Bruce R Schackman1.   

Abstract

Background: Naloxone is an opioid antagonist medication that can be administered by lay people or medical professionals to reverse opioid overdoses and reduce overdose mortality. Cost was identified as a potential barrier to providing expanded overdose education and naloxone distribution (OEND) in New York City (NYC) in 2017. We estimated the cost of delivering OEND for different types of opioid overdose prevention programs (OOPPs) in NYC.
Methods: We interviewed naloxone coordinators at 11 syringe service programs (SSPs) and 10 purposively sampled non-SSPs in NYC from December 2017 to September 2019. The samples included diverse non-SSP program types, program sizes, and OEND funding sources. We calculated one-time start up costs and ongoing operating costs using micro-costing methods to estimate the cost of personnel time and materials for OEND activities from the program perspective, but excluding naloxone kit costs.
Results: Implementing an OEND program required a one-time median startup cost of $874 for SSPs and $2,548 for other programs excluding overhead, with 80% of those costs attributed to time and travel for training staff. SSPs spent a median of $90 per staff member trained and non-SSPs spent $150 per staff member. The median monthly cost of OEND program activities excluding overhead was $1,579 for SSPs and $2,529 for non-SSPs. The costs for non-SSPs varied by size, with larger, multi-site programs having higher median costs compared to single-site programs. The estimated median cost per kit dispensed excluding and including overhead was $19 versus $25 per kit for SSPs, and $36 versus $43 per kit for non-SSPs, respectively. Conclusions: OEND operating costs vary by program type and number of sites. Funders should consider that providing free naloxone to OEND programs does not cover full operating costs. Further exploration of cost-effectiveness and program efficiency should be considered across different types of OEND settings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost; naloxone; overdose education

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34666633      PMCID: PMC9048167          DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2021.1986877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Subst Abus        ISSN: 0889-7077            Impact factor:   3.984


  23 in total

1.  Opioid abuse in the United States and Department of Health and Human Services actions to address opioid-drug-related overdoses and deaths.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother       Date:  2015-06

2.  Cost-effectiveness of distributing naloxone to heroin users for lay overdose reversal.

Authors:  Phillip O Coffin; Sean D Sullivan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Cost-Effectiveness of Take-Home Naloxone for the Prevention of Overdose Fatalities among Heroin Users in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Sue Langham; Antony Wright; James Kenworthy; Richard Grieve; William C N Dunlop
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2018-02-04       Impact factor: 5.725

4.  Implementing an overdose education and naloxone distribution program in a health system.

Authors:  Jennifer Devries; Sally Rafie; Gregory Polston
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2017-02-21

5.  Impact of a community-based naloxone distribution program on opioid overdose death rates.

Authors:  Rebecca B Naumann; Christine Piette Durrance; Shabbar I Ranapurwala; Anna E Austin; Scott Proescholdbell; Robert Childs; Stephen W Marshall; Susan Kansagra; Meghan E Shanahan
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Cost-effectiveness of distributing naloxone to heroin users for lay overdose reversal in Russian cities.

Authors:  Phillip O Coffin; Sean D Sullivan
Journal:  J Med Econ       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.448

7.  Group Visits for Overdose Education and Naloxone Distribution in Primary Care: A Pilot Quality Improvement Initiative.

Authors:  Juliette F Spelman; Stephanie Peglow; Amy R Schwartz; Lucille Burgo-Black; Katelyn McNamara; William C Becker
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 8.  Opioid overdose prevention and naloxone rescue kits: what we know and what we don't know.

Authors:  Todd Kerensky; Alexander Y Walley
Journal:  Addict Sci Clin Pract       Date:  2017-01-07

9.  Telementoring of primary care providers delivering hepatitis C treatment in New York City: Results from Project INSPIRE.

Authors:  Paul A Teixeira; Marie P Bresnahan; Fabienne Laraque; Alain H Litwin; Shuchin J Shukla; Jonathan M Schwartz; Sheila Reynoso; Ponni V Perumalswami; Jeffrey M Weiss; Brooke Wyatt; Bruce R Schackman
Journal:  Learn Health Syst       Date:  2018-05-10

10.  Effectiveness of Scotland's National Naloxone Programme for reducing opioid-related deaths: a before (2006-10) versus after (2011-13) comparison.

Authors:  Sheila M Bird; Andrew McAuley; Samantha Perry; Carole Hunter
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 6.526

View more
  1 in total

1.  Availability of and Obstacles to Providing COVID-19 Vaccinations at Syringe Services Programs in the United States, 2021.

Authors:  Don C Des Jarlais; Czarina N Behrends; Maria A Corcorran; Sara N Glick; David C Perlman; Shashi N Kapadia; Xinlin Lu; Jonathan Feelemyer; Paul LaKosky; Stephanie M Prohaska; Bruce R Schackman
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 3.117

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.