Literature DB >> 34665387

Debris-stimulated tumor growth: a Pandora's box?

Victoria M Haak1,2,3, Sui Huang4, Dipak Panigrahy5,6.   

Abstract

Current cancer therapies aim at eradicating cancer cells from the body. However, killing cells generates cell "debris" which can promote tumor progression. Thus, therapy can be a double-edged sword. Specifically, injury and debris generated by cancer therapies, including chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery, may offset their benefit by promoting the secretion of pro-tumorigenic factors (e.g., eicosanoid-driven cytokines) that stimulate regrowth and metastasis of surviving cells. The debris produced by cytotoxic cancer therapy can also contribute to a tumor microenvironment that promotes tumor progression and recurrence. Although not well understood, several molecular mechanisms have been implicated in debris-stimulated tumor growth that we review here, such as the involvement of extracellular vesicles, exosomal miR-194-5p, Bax, Bak, Smac, HMGB1, cytokines, and caspase-3. We discuss the cases of pancreatic and other cancer types where debris promotes postoperative tumor recurrence and metastasis, thus offering a new opportunity to prevent cancer progression intrinsically linked to treatment by stimulating resolution of tumor-promoting debris.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bak; Bax; Caspase-3; Chemotherapy; Debris; Exosomal miR-194-5p; Extracellular vesicles; HMGB1; Inflammation; Metastasis; Platelet activating factor; Radiation; Recurrence; Resolution of inflammation; Smac; Specialized pro-resolving mediators; Surgery; Tumor progression

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34665387      PMCID: PMC8524220          DOI: 10.1007/s10555-021-09998-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev        ISSN: 0167-7659            Impact factor:   9.264


Introduction

The stimulation of tumor growth by dead cell debris is of high clinical relevance, independent of modality. Whether surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, anti-angiogenic, immunotherapy, or targeted therapy, interventions that seek the reduction of tumor burden involve tissue injury and cell death in the tumor bed. From numerous pre-clinical studies, the dead cell debris production has emerged as the material source of this paradoxical stimulation of tumor growth associated with treatment, which underlies the inherent limitation of cancer treatment. A variety of animal tumor models have demonstrated the growth-stimulating activity of injection of tumor cell debris along with the tumor graft [1-3]. Established living cell tumors in mice can also produce cell debris in situ by systemic administration of chemotherapy, supporting the biological relevance of the debris-stimulated tumor growth [1]. These studies on debris generated by chemotherapy are consistent with previous observations of debris produced by radiation therapy by Laszlo Révész in 1956 who attributed the stimulation of tumor growth to diffusible factors that conditioned the tumor microenvironment (Révész effect) [4-6]. Thus, debris-stimulated tumor growth may present a novel target for preventing tumor growth and metastasis following treatment.

What is “debris”?

There are several mechanisms of cell death including apoptotic cell death, “autophagic cell” death, and necrotic cell death [1, 7–11]. As one of the hallmarks of cancer is impaired deregulation of apoptosis, therapies target promoting cell death [12, 13]. Cellular “debris” is produced from this therapy strategy. “Debris” is the resulting dead cell fragments that have yet to be cleared by the immune system [1]. Cancer therapies, including radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery, trigger the release of soluble factors from dying tumor cells, which recruit immune cells to engulf the debris [2, 7, 8]. However, these therapies can be a double-edged sword as dying cells can also secrete pro-tumorigenic eicosanoids, cytokines, and other mediators between the dying tumor cells and the surviving tumor cells [1–3, 7, 12, 14–17]. The goal in cancer therapy over the past century has been to induce cell death in order to halt and regress tumor growth. However, the induction of cell death (production of “debris”) can also possess a “dark side” with oncogenic properties that can stimulate tumorigenesis [9, 11, 18]. For example, apoptotic cell death can exhibit oncogenic potential by stimulating immune and inflammatory responses as well as triggering tissue repair and regeneration leading to an “onco-regenerative niche” [10]. The rapid tumor growth of cancer can lead to apoptosis via hypoxia, and the continuous production of apoptotic debris promotes tumor growth via inflammation [1, 2, 17]. Therefore, even natural cell death in the tumor microenvironment can promote tumor repopulation as tumorigenesis can be accelerated with treatment-induced cell death [1, 15, 19]. After the generation of debris by cancer therapies, tumors can initiate a process of accelerated repopulation leading to tumor recurrence [19-21]. Elevated cleaved caspase-3, a pro-apoptotic effector molecule, is associated with shortened survival in several cancer types including gastric, ovarian, cervical, and colorectal cancers [11, 20]. Importantly, high levels of spontaneous apoptotic cell death (“tumor cell debris”) correlate with poor patient prognosis and/or survival in many cancer types including breast, head and neck (e.g., squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue and laryngeal), bladder, synovial sarcoma, liver, colorectal, ovarian, prostate, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and esophageal (as reviewed in [22]) [18, 23–34]. Elevated levels of tumor cell debris can lead to an aggressive pro-tumorigenic phenotype in pre-clinical models and in humans [1–3, 17, 25, 26, 32–35]. Thus, every attempt to kill cancer cells and cause tumor cell death is a double-edged sword as the resulting unresolved debris stimulates the growth of surviving tumor cells [1–3, 9, 11, 14, 15, 18, 21, 36–39]. It is crucial to understand the mechanisms of debris-stimulated cancer progression in order to enhance current cancer therapies to stimulate the clearance and resolution of tumor cell debris [21, 40].

Radiation-stimulated cancer

Over the past century, cancer therapy has focused on killing cancer cells, from broad cytotoxic therapy to the inhibition of specific molecular pathways, in order to reduce tumor burden as typified by chemotherapy and radiation. However, cancer therapy may inherently be a double-edged sword as radiation-induced apoptotic tumor cells can promote tumor growth (the Révész phenomenon) [4, 15, 41–44]. Radiation induces DNA damage that relays a stress signal in cells which activates the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis [10]. Stimulating cell apoptosis is a well-known mechanism for killing tumor cells, yet dying tumor cells can usurp the apoptotic process to secrete pro-tumorigenesis signals to accelerate repopulation of the radiation-treated tumors [19, 20]. The Révész phenomenon has been corroborated in several follow-up studies of radiation-induced cell death [15, 41, 42, 45–47]. Thus, dead and dying tumor cells (“debris”) contribute to an underappreciated component of the tumor microenvironment that may promote tumor progression and tumor dormancy escape [1–3, 9, 11, 14, 17, 36, 48]. Radiation is a therapy offered to patients with the treatment schedule consisting of daily fractions that are divided off to give time for normal tissues that have been affected by the radiation to recover [7]. It has previously been assumed that most of the dead cells created by radiation would be engulfed through phagocytosis and efferocytosis; thus, tumor recurrence would only proliferate slowly by the minimal tumor cells left behind from the radiation [5]. During the intervals between radiation treatments, surviving tumor cells are stimulated by the apoptotic debris to repopulate at an accelerating rate [7, 49] (Fig. 1a). High expression of pro-apoptotic signals, such as caspase-3, correlates with tumor reoccurrence in patients with postoperative radiotherapy [50]. Unfortunately, radiation therapy may not always be a complete treatment option for cancer patients. Further studies are urgently needed to combine radiation with “pro-resolving” therapies which stimulate the resolution of debris [21].
Fig. 1

The general mechanisms for (a) radiation-stimulated cancer, (b) chemotherapy-stimulated cancer, and (c) surgery-stimulated cancer. (a) After stimulating the tumor cells with radiation therapy, debris is created from the dead cells; however, when there are escaped living tumor cells, they are stimulated by the secreted pro-inflammatory signals from the debris to increase tumor proliferation, growth, and regeneration. (b) Chemotherapy generates debris from killing the tumor cells, and the debris stimulates the release of pro-tumorigenic cytokines and signals that leads to tumor reoccurrence. (c) Surgery induces systemic inflammation leading to impairment of the resolution of inflammation, increased tumor angiogenesis, and promotion of tumor dormancy escape, which stimulates tumor growth and metastasis

The general mechanisms for (a) radiation-stimulated cancer, (b) chemotherapy-stimulated cancer, and (c) surgery-stimulated cancer. (a) After stimulating the tumor cells with radiation therapy, debris is created from the dead cells; however, when there are escaped living tumor cells, they are stimulated by the secreted pro-inflammatory signals from the debris to increase tumor proliferation, growth, and regeneration. (b) Chemotherapy generates debris from killing the tumor cells, and the debris stimulates the release of pro-tumorigenic cytokines and signals that leads to tumor reoccurrence. (c) Surgery induces systemic inflammation leading to impairment of the resolution of inflammation, increased tumor angiogenesis, and promotion of tumor dormancy escape, which stimulates tumor growth and metastasis

Chemotherapy-stimulated cancer

As apoptosis is the body’s main mechanism of cell death, most chemotherapies act to induce apoptosis of tumor cells [12]. After chemotherapy or targeted therapy, the dying tumor cells (“debris”) should then be engulfed by immune cells, such as macrophages, neutrophils, and dendritic cells. However, when tumor cell debris generated by chemotherapy and a subthreshold inoculum of living tumor cells that would not otherwise proliferate into a tumor are co-injected into an animal model, there is potent stimulation of tumor growth [1-3]. Chemotherapy has the potential to directly promote tumor repopulation and/or metastasis through the production of tumor cell debris-stimulated eicosanoids and cytokines [1, 2, 14] (Fig. 1b). Chemotherapy-generated debris promotes tumorigenesis by stimulating the release of a cytokine storm of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and TNF-α by macrophages [1, 2, 14] (Fig. 1b). This is similar to the cell-death stimulated eicosanoid-driven cytokine storm in infection such as COVID-19 [51, 52]. Discovering a way to overcome this paradoxical dilemma or Pandora’s box is crucial in order to prevent tumor reoccurrence after cancer therapy. Despite the effectiveness of chemotherapy as a frontline cancer therapy, accumulating compelling evidence from animal models suggests that chemotherapy may stimulate tumor growth and metastasis [1, 43, 53–70]. However, the mechanisms for chemotherapy-induced tumor metastasis remain poorly understood. In the subthreshold inoculum model, instead of suppressing tumor growth, chemotherapy promoted tumor growth in small or dormant tumors via tumor-promoting debris [1, 3]. Similarly, chemotherapy-generated tumor cell “debris” (apoptotic and necrotic cells and cell fragments) promotes cancer progression and metastasis via stimulating an eicosanoid-driven cytokine storm of pro-inflammatory and pro-angiogenic mediators [1, 2, 14, 38, 39, 57, 76], polarizing tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) as well as inducing immunosuppression and limiting anti-tumor immunity [24, 77, 78]. Thus, new approaches to stimulate the clearance of tumor cell debris are urgently needed [1, 21, 40, 78–80].

Surgery-stimulated cancer

Surgery is usually a first-line therapy to eradicate the bulk mass of the tumor. However, similar to chemotherapy and radiation, surgery can be both beneficial and harmful to cancer patients. Surgery, including biopsies, can trigger tumor dormancy escape via multiple mechanisms including impairing tumor-specific immunity, stimulating inflammation, disrupting the resolution of inflammation, and enhancing tumor angiogenesis [1, 2, 4, 74, 81–93]. Additionally, through the systemic and local inflammation as well as immunosuppression induced by surgery, metastasis can be stimulated [81, 83], which can promote proliferation and growth of dormant cancer cells at distant anatomical sites [81, 83] (Fig. 1c). Due to a bimodal pattern of tumor recurrence found in early-stage breast and lung cancers, surgery may induce tumor dormancy escape in micrometastatic lesions thus promoting metastasis [81, 94, 95]. Even healthy individuals exhibit microscopic dormant cancer cells that can be activated to proliferate into tumors from noncancer-related surgeries and anesthesia [81, 96]. Tumor recurrence and metastasis are common causes of death among various cancer types, including pancreatic, breast, liver, colon, and ovarian cancer [2, 3]. One-third of patients diagnosed with localized breast cancer exhibit metastatic spread to other locations since their initial diagnosis [83, 97, 98]. Breast cancer patients that have their primary tumor removed surgically have a higher risk for tumor relapse 12 to 18 months post-surgery [83, 90]. The link between surgery and the consequent wound-healing response can promote tumor cell proliferation after surgery, specifically the inflammation associated with wound repair [83, 99, 100]. Surgery is the desired and necessary treatment option for many cancer types, so it is important to enhance the beneficial effects of surgery via pro-resolution (“debris-clearing”) lipid mediators to decrease the risk of distant metastasis and tumor recurrence [81].

Mechanisms of debris-stimulated tumor growth

Extracellular vesicles

Apoptotic cells communicate with neighboring cells through several important mechanisms including direct contact, secretion of bioactive molecules into the extracellular matrix, and production of membrane-bound sub-cellular vesicles [10]. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are a type of membrane-bound sub-cellular vesicle generated by apoptotic cells that vary in size, role, composition, and cargo [101]. EVs can transmit bioactive small molecules, proteins, and nucleic acids [101]. Radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and other cytotoxic therapies enhance the secretion of EVs from dying tumor cells [102]. Apoptotic derived extracellular vesicles (Apo-EVs) can secrete signals to initiate cell-to-cell communication, which aid in signaling surviving tumor cells to undergo tissue repair and accelerated regeneration [101]. The apoptotic tumor cell-derived signals trigger the mechanistic pathways for tumor growth, metastasis, and post-therapeutic relapse [101]. For example, in murine melanoma, EVs promote tumorigenesis through production of growth factors, suppression of anti-tumor immunity, and stimulation of angiogenesis [101, 103]. Another potential mechanism of the pro-tumorigenic activity of EVs is to transfer nutrients such as amino acids, lipids, citrate, and pyruvate to tumor cells to allow growth in a nutrient-deficient environment [101, 104]. In response to stressful conditions, Apo-EVs can also transfer organelles such as mitochondria to other cells [101]. In addition to nutrients and organelles, Apo-EVs, through horizontal transfer, can transfer DNA to neighboring cells, including tumor cells [101]. EVs can also alter the metabolic profile of pancreatic tumor cells [101, 104]. EVs play an important role in the tumor microenvironment by providing critical stress-induced signals to induce proliferation [101]. Further mechanistic studies of debris-stimulated tumor growth will be critical to uncover important targets to inhibit tumor-derived Apo-EVs and lead to novel cancer therapies [101].

Exosomal miR-194-5p

Tumor repopulation is a major cause of treatment failure in cancer patients after chemotherapy and radiation, including a significant increased incidence in pancreatic cancer [46, 102, 105–107]. As previously described, EVs play an important role in intercellular communication and in promoting cancer progression [102]. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a type of small non-coding RNA that can be found as vital cargo inside of EVs [102]. Exosomal miR-194-5p derived from radiation-stimulated tumor cell death promotes tumor cell repopulation [102]. After radiation, there is an increase in exosomes released from dead cells, and when the miRNA contained inside was sequenced, a significant increase in miR-194-5p was found [102]. miR-194-5p can downregulate the transcription factor E2F3 to activate cell cycle arrest and repair in the surviving tumor cells [102]. Also, miR-194-5p has been shown to act on tumor repopulating cells to facilitate repair from any damage done to the cell from the radiation [102]. In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, miR-194-5p can stimulate tumor growth and progression [102, 108]. Fortunately, low-dose aspirin can inhibit tumor proliferation in pancreatic cancer via suppression of the secretion of exosomes from dying tumor cells [102]. Aspirin triggers SPMs including resolvins and lipoxins that can mediate the intricate anti-tumor activity of aspirin [79]. Thus, aspirin and pro-resolution lipid mediators may enhance the anti-tumor activity of radiation via the clearance of tumor-promoting cell debris and the downregulation of exosomal miR-194-5p.

Bax, Bak, and Smac

Pro-apoptotic proteins Bax, Bak, and Smac are potential markers of prognosis in patients with chemotherapy-treated metastatic melanoma [12]. Chemotherapy inhibits cancer by eliminating tumor cells through apoptosis, and Bax, Bak, and Smac are key apoptosis regulators [12]. When activated, Bax and Bak create pores in the outer membrane of the mitochondria, initiating mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP), which then releases pro-apoptotic factors, such as Smac [11, 12, 109]. Paradoxically, low expression of Bax, Bak, and Smac is correlated with predicting prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) (> 12 months) in metastatic melanoma, and high levels of Bax can correlate with poor outcomes [11, 12, 110–114]. Similarly, high expression levels of Bax are associated with an increased risk of relapse in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia and poor prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma [12, 113–116]. High expression levels of the Bax antagonist Bcl-2 correlate with an improved prognosis in colorectal, breast, glioma, gastric, and non-small cell lung cancer [11, 12, 112, 117–121]. Although seemingly counterintuitive, the paradox of debris-stimulated tumors provides new mechanisms of how chemotherapy can stimulate tumor growth and metastasis.

HMGB1

High mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) is released by dying cells treated with radiation therapy or chemotherapy [7]. HMGB1, a damage associated molecular pattern—DAMP, is released from cells undergoing necrosis or uncontrolled cellular and nuclear swelling in response to injury [7, 122, 123]. HMGB1 can stimulate remaining living tumor cells to promote angiogenesis, proliferation, and facilitate metastasis [7, 106]. This effect is in response to HMGB1 binding to the receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE) [7]. RAGE then activates downstream pathways ERK and p38, which initiates cell proliferation [7]. In addition to this mechanism, it was found that higher levels of HMGB1 expression correspond with lower overall survival of cancer patients [7]. When analyzing serum from patients treated with radiation, it was found that there were higher concentrations of HMGB1 [7]. Under normal conditions, HMGB1 is located in the nucleus with roles in DNA repair; however, when secreted to the outside of the cell, this protein is associated with cell proliferation, autophagy, inflammation, and immunity [7, 124, 125]. Due to apoptotic cells being programed to hold HMGB1 within the cell, the extracellular levels of HMGB1 must originate from necrotic cells [7]. Radiation combined with a HMGB1 inhibitor may be a treatment option to suppress the cell proliferation of the escaped tumor cells [7].

Caspase-3

Various caspases can induce tumor cell resistance and tumor cell proliferation in response to various anti-cancer therapies [126, 127]. Caspase-3 is a cysteine protease that rapidly induces apoptotic death at the termination of dying cells’ apoptotic mechanism [7, 12, 129]. High levels of the pro-apoptotic effector caspase-3 are associated with aggressive disease, large tumor size, poor prognosis, and poor disease-free survival in patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy [20, 50, 101, 116]. Similarly, patients in an early pathology stage of buccal mucosa squamous cell carcinoma that had low co-expression of caspase-3 and cleaved caspase-3 were associated with better disease-specific survival [50]. Activation of caspase-3 has been shown to stimulate cell proliferation in surviving tumor cells after radiation [7, 128]. Caspase-3 activates downstream effector cytosolic calcium-independent phospholipase A2 (iPLA2) to generate arachidonic acid, which is the precursor of the pro-inflammatory eicosanoid prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) [7, 16, 50, 73, 130]. PGE2 critically regulates processes involved in tumor growth, metastasis, inflammation, and cancer stem cell regeneration [73, 131]. The secretion of PGE2 promotes the survival and rapid growth of escaped tumor cells leading to tumor recurrence [131]. In addition to survival and proliferation, PGE2 can decrease the sensitivity of tumor cells to radiation, leading to tumor cell repopulation [50, 132]. The production of PGE2 by apoptotic tumor cells occurs in bladder cancer, leading to chemoresistance by stimulating cancer stem cell regrowth [132]. Elevated levels of caspase-3 and cleaved caspase-3 have been observed in various tumor tissues including glioblastoma [133], melanoma [134], acute myelogenous leukemia [135], breast carcinoma [136, 137], non-small cell lung cancer [138], oral squamous cell carcinoma [139], buccal mucosal squamous cell carcinoma [50], gastric cancer, ovarian cancer, cervical cancer, colorectal cancer, and pancreatic ductal carcinoma [20, 140, 141]. In pancreatic cancer, caspase-3 not only has been linked to tumor recurrence, but is also an indicator of invasiveness [140]. After investigating the immunoreactivity of caspase-3 in tissue from patients with normal pancreatic tissue, pancreatic duct cell carcinoma (PDC), and intraductal papillary-mucinous tumor of the pancreas (IPMT), an overexpression of caspase-3 in PDC and invasive IPMT tissues was identified [140]. This suggests that expression of caspase-3 may contribute to pancreatic cancer invasiveness. In the previously mentioned bladder cancer model, after neutralizing PGE2 signaling, there was a reduction in the emergence of chemoresistance [132]. Ongoing treatment studies are targeting patients that are undergoing chemotherapy or radiation with an inhibitor that would block PGE2 production or an inhibitor of caspase-3 to enhance the sensitivity of the cancer cells to the treatment [7, 11, 20, 50, 126, 132]. However, a caveat is that PGE2 is critical for a lipid-mediator class switching from pro-inflammatory eicosanoids such as leukotrienes and thromboxanes to the specialized pro-resolving mediators including lipoxins [74, 142].

Potential therapies to target debris-stimulated cancer

Platelet activating factor

Tumor cells that survive during radiation and chemotherapy undergo accelerated repopulation [143]. The stress induced by these therapies stimulates the production of abundant platelet activating factor-like molecules and overexpression of their receptor in tumor cells [44, 143–147]. Platelet activating factor is a soluble lipid mediator that plays an important role in inflammation and tumorigenesis [143, 148, 149]. The G-protein coupled receptor for platelet activating factor can be found in both tumor cells and cells that penetrate tumors [143, 150]. During cancer therapies, the dying tumor cells release pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α, which then initiate the production of an agonist of platelet activating factor receptor [143, 151–153]. The platelet activating factor receptor induces tumor cell proliferation and production of survival signals and stimulates tumor angiogenesis [143]. After blocking platelet activating factor in experimental models, there was a decrease in tumor size and an increase in animal survival [143]. Antagonists of platelet activating factor reduce tumor repopulation [143]. Thus, a platelet activating factor antagonist, in combination with chemotherapy or radiation, may prevent debris-simulated repopulation of tumor cells [143].

Resolution of inflammation

Inflammation plays an essential role in debris-stimulated cancers, as it promotes tumor cell growth, repair, and repopulation [21]. Debris-stimulated macrophages and other immune cells stimulate inflammation via secretion of pro-inflammatory, pro-angiogenic, and pro-tumorigenic eicosanoid-driven cytokines [1, 2, 17]. The resolution of inflammation has been discovered by the Serhan laboratory to be an active process regulated by endogenous specialized pro-resolving mediators (SPMs), which promote the clearance of debris and terminate inflammation [74, 154–156]. Resolvins (Rv) are SPMs that can stimulate the natural debris-clearing process and terminate inflammatory mechanisms [21, 40, 74]. Unlike conventional anti-inflammatories, resolvins are agonists for the resolution of inflammation, are not immunosuppressive, and act at much lower doses [40]. Debris and cell death can induce tumor-promoting inflammation; therefore, the clearance of debris inhibits tumor growth via stimulation of the resolution of inflammation via resolvins [1, 79, 81] (Fig. 2). In a pancreatic tumor model, resolvins were found to induce tumor regression in combination with chemotherapy [1]; thus, stimulating the resolution of inflammation via resolvins enhances chemotherapy in this model of cancer as well as genetically engineered models of breast and prostate cancer [1]. SPMs can convert macrophages from a pro-inflammatory phenotype into a pro-resolving phenotype, which enhances debris phagocytosis and inhibits further pro-tumorigenic and pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion [1]. D-series resolvin (RvD)1, RvD2, and E-series resolvin (RvE)1 suppressed tumor repopulation in various tumor types including lung, pancreatic, head and neck cancer, and prostate cancer mouse models [1]. In models of lung cancer and melanoma metastatic, RvD1 and RvD2 were able to suppress metastasis [1]. Resolvins (RvD2, RvD3, and RvD4) were also studied to determine resolvins role in the prevention of tumor dormancy escape and micrometastases from proliferating after surgery [81]. It was found that, if administered before surgery, resolvins suppressed metastasis, increased survival, and inhibited tumor-dormancy escape [81]. Resolvins, in combination with other targeted therapies, can enhance anti-tumor activity and clearance of debris, suppress tumor and metastatic growth, and block further release of pro-inflammatory cytokines [1]. Thus, resolvins are a novel approach to suppress debris-stimulated tumor growth.
Fig. 2

Cancer therapies need to have a balance between pro-inflammatory factors and pro-resolving mediators. Current therapies are focused on the direct killing or removal of tumor cells, which results in an unintentional abundance of proinflammatory/pro-tumorigenesis signals being released from the cancer therapy-generated debris. When there are superfluous pro-inflammatory signals, the environment can stimulate tumor recurrence and metastasis, whereas pro-resolving mediators can stimulate immune cells to engulf the debris and mitigate the pro-tumor signals

Cancer therapies need to have a balance between pro-inflammatory factors and pro-resolving mediators. Current therapies are focused on the direct killing or removal of tumor cells, which results in an unintentional abundance of proinflammatory/pro-tumorigenesis signals being released from the cancer therapy-generated debris. When there are superfluous pro-inflammatory signals, the environment can stimulate tumor recurrence and metastasis, whereas pro-resolving mediators can stimulate immune cells to engulf the debris and mitigate the pro-tumor signals In addition to resolvins, omega-3 fatty acids may also inhibit inflammation in pancreatic cancer [157, 158]. Targeting soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibition also inhibits debris-stimulated tumor growth in ovarian and liver cancer models via macrophage phagocytosis of debris as well as blocking of pro-inflammatory eicosanoids and cytokines [2, 17]. Although radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery create cell debris, stimulate inflammation, and enhance the tumor microenvironment for repopulation, promoting the resolution of inflammation can stimulate macrophages to engulf debris, block pro-inflammatory factors, and suppress tumor growth and metastasis. Current therapies, such as NSAIDs can be “resolution toxic,” meaning they disrupt the endogenous mechanisms of the resolution of inflammation [74, 81, 154]. Thus, agonists of the resolution of inflammation pathway including resolvins represent a promising approach to prevent debris-stimulated tumor growth and accelerated repopulation.

Conclusion

Chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation all contribute to debris-stimulated cancer. The debris generated from these therapies secrete pro-tumorigenesis factors to promote tumor angiogenesis, proliferation, growth, metastasis, and recurrence. Cancers of all types fall victim to the paradoxical dilemma of debris-stimulated cancer. Fortunately, there are novel approaches to stimulate the resolution or clearance of debris, such as promoting the resolution of inflammation via resolvins or soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitors, that can be used in combination with traditional cytotoxic cancer therapies to prevent tumor growth and metastasis.
  154 in total

1.  Molecular cloning and characterization of the platelet-activating factor receptor gene expressed in the human heart.

Authors:  T Sugimoto; H Tsuchimochi; C G McGregor; H Mutoh; T Shimizu; Y Kurachi
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1992-12-15       Impact factor: 3.575

2.  The end and after: how dying cells impact the living organism.

Authors:  Douglas R Green
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 31.745

3.  Paclitaxel therapy promotes breast cancer metastasis in a TLR4-dependent manner.

Authors:  Lisa Volk-Draper; Kelly Hall; Caitlin Griggs; Sandeep Rajput; Pascaline Kohio; David DeNardo; Sophia Ran
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Preoperative stimulation of resolution and inflammation blockade eradicates micrometastases.

Authors:  Dipak Panigrahy; Allison Gartung; Jun Yang; Haixia Yang; Molly M Gilligan; Megan L Sulciner; Swati S Bhasin; Diane R Bielenberg; Jaimie Chang; Birgitta A Schmidt; Julia Piwowarski; Anna Fishbein; Dulce Soler-Ferran; Matthew A Sparks; Steven J Staffa; Vidula Sukhatme; Bruce D Hammock; Mark W Kieran; Sui Huang; Manoj Bhasin; Charles N Serhan; Vikas P Sukhatme
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  The environmental stressor ultraviolet B radiation inhibits murine antitumor immunity through its ability to generate platelet-activating factor agonists.

Authors:  Ravi P Sahu; Matthew J Turner; Sonia C DaSilva; Badri M Rashid; Jesus A Ocana; Susan M Perkins; Raymond L Konger; Christopher E Touloukian; Mark H Kaplan; Jeffrey B Travers
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.944

6.  The pattern of CPP32/caspase-3 expression reflects the biological behavior of the human pancreatic duct cell tumors.

Authors:  K Satoh; K Kaneko; M Hirota; T Toyota; T Shimosegawa
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.327

7.  Reduced expression of caspase-8 and cleaved caspase-3 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells.

Authors:  Katarzyna Jakubowska; Katarzyna Guzińska-Ustymowicz; Waldemar Famulski; Dariusz Cepowicz; Dorota Jagodzińska; Anna Pryczynicz
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 8.  Pro-resolving lipid mediators are leads for resolution physiology.

Authors:  Charles N Serhan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Caspase 3-mediated stimulation of tumor cell repopulation during cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Qian Huang; Fang Li; Xinjian Liu; Wenrong Li; Wei Shi; Fei-Fei Liu; Brian O'Sullivan; Zhimin He; Yuanlin Peng; Aik-Choon Tan; Ling Zhou; Jingping Shen; Gangwen Han; Xiao-Jing Wang; Jackie Thorburn; Andrew Thorburn; Antonio Jimeno; David Raben; Joel S Bedford; Chuan-Yuan Li
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2011-07-03       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  Oncogenic properties of apoptotic tumor cells in aggressive B cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Catriona A Ford; Sofia Petrova; John D Pound; Jorine J L P Voss; Lynsey Melville; Margaret Paterson; Sarah L Farnworth; Awen M Gallimore; Simone Cuff; Helen Wheadon; Edwina Dobbin; Carol Anne Ogden; Ingrid E Dumitriu; Donald R Dunbar; Paul G Murray; Dominik Ruckerl; Judith E Allen; David A Hume; Nico van Rooijen; John R Goodlad; Tom C Freeman; Christopher D Gregory
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  2 in total

1.  Combined Action of Hyper-Harmonized Hydroxylated Fullerene Water Complex and Hyperpolarized Light Leads to Melanoma Cell Reprogramming In Vitro.

Authors:  Milica Markelić; Dijana Drača; Tamara Krajnović; Zorana Jović; Milica Vuksanović; Djuro Koruga; Sanja Mijatović; Danijela Maksimović-Ivanić
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 5.719

Review 2.  COVID-19 and cancer: start the resolution!

Authors:  Chantal Barksdale; Franciele C Kipper; Selvakumar Subbian; Charles N Serhan; Dipak Panigrahy; Shreya Tripathy
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 9.237

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.