Literature DB >> 34665074

Assessment of the Operational Characteristics of Research Ethics Committees in Ghana.

Samuel Asiedu Owusu1, Grace Addison2, Barbara Redman3, Lisa Kearns3, Paul Amuna4, Amos Laar5.   

Abstract

There were eighteen Research Ethics Committees (RECs) operating in Ghana as of December 2019 but no empirical assessment of their operational characteristics had been conducted. We assessed the characteristics of Ghanaian RECs using an existing Self-Assessment Tool for RECs in Developing Countries. We present results from nine RECs that participated in this nation-wide assessment. Our results indicate that the RECs are generally adherent to the recommendations in the Tool including being composed of members with diverse expertise. They also reviewed and approved research protocols as well as had access to some limited funding for their activities. There is no national policy on research human protections or an ethics authority to regulate the activities of the RECs. We recommend the establishment of this authority in Ghana while encouraging institutions to sustain efforts aimed at making their RECs operate independently.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Research Ethics Committees; characteristics; ghana; operational

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34665074      PMCID: PMC8712386          DOI: 10.1177/15562646211051189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  8 in total

1.  What makes clinical research ethical?

Authors:  E J Emanuel; D Wendler; C Grady
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000 May 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  What makes clinical research in developing countries ethical? The benchmarks of ethical research.

Authors:  Ezekiel J Emanuel; David Wendler; Jack Killen; Christine Grady
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  Mapping research ethics committees in Africa: Evidence of the growth of ethics review of health research in Africa.

Authors:  Boitumelo Mokgatla; Carel IJsselmuiden; Doug Wassenaar; Mary Kasule
Journal:  Dev World Bioeth       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.294

4.  Results of a self-assessment tool to assess the operational characteristics of research ethics committees in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Henry Silverman; Hany Sleem; Keymanthri Moodley; Nandini Kumar; Sudeshni Naidoo; Thilakavathi Subramanian; Rola Jaafar; Malini Moni
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2014-04-19       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Institutional Approaches to Research Integrity in Ghana.

Authors:  Amos K Laar; Barbara K Redman; Kyle Ferguson; Arthur Caplan
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Research misconduct definitions adopted by U.S. research institutions.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Talicia Neal; Austin Raymond; Grace E Kissling
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  Development of an accessible self-assessment tool for research ethics committees in developing countries.

Authors:  Hany Sleem; Rehab Abdelhai Ahmed Abdelhai; Imad Al-Abdallat; Mohammed Al-Naif; Hala Mansour Gabr; Et-Taher Kehil; Bakr Bin Sadiq; Reham Yousri; Dyaeldin Elsayed; Suad Sulaiman; Henry Silverman
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  To keep or not to keep? Decision making in adolescent pregnancies in Jamestown, Ghana.

Authors:  Luchuo Engelbert Bain; Marjolein B M Zweekhorst; Mary Amoakoh-Coleman; Seda Muftugil-Yalcin; Abejirinde Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade; Renaud Becquet; Tjard de Cock Buning
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Performance of IRBs in China: a survey on IRB employees and researchers' experiences and perceptions.

Authors:  Xing Liu; Ying Wu; Min Yang; Yang Li; Kaveh Khoshnood; Esther Luo; Lun Li; Xiaomin Wang
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 2.834

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.