Karen Buch1, Reza Hakimelahi2, Joseph J Locascio3, Divya S Bolar4, R Giliberto Gonzalez2, Pamela W Schaefer2. 1. Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Gray 241 G, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. kbuch@partners.org. 2. Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Gray 241 G, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. 3. Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the utility of ASL in evaluating patients presenting to the ED with stroke-like symptoms. METHODS: ASL and DWI images from 526 consecutive patients presenting to the ED with acute stroke symptoms were retrospectively reviewed. DWI images were evaluated for volume of restricted diffusion using ABC/2. ASL maps were evaluated for decreased, normal, or increased signal. The volume of decreased ASL signal was calculated using the same ABC/2 technique. The volume of decreased ASL signal was correlated with the volume of DWI signal abnormality to identify cases of mismatch (DWI:ASL ratio > 1.8) and to correlate this mismatch with infarct growth on imaging follow-up. NIHSS, length of hospital stay, mRS, and future admission for acute stroke-like symptoms were recorded. Correlations between ASL abnormalities and clinical parameters were evaluated using a two-tailed t-test. RESULTS: Of the 526 patients presenting with acute stroke symptoms, 136 patients had an abnormal ASL scan and 388 patients had a normal ASL scan. Of the 136 patients with abnormal ASL, 84 patients had low ASL signal with 79 of these being related to acute infarcts. Elevated ASL signal was seen in 52 patients, of which 30 of these patients had reperfusion hyperemia related to acute infarctions. ASL had a negative predictive value of 94% for evaluating patients with acute ischemic stroke. A subset of patients with abnormal ASL scans with a discharge diagnosis of acute infarction were found to have an ASL:DWI mismatch (ratio > 1.8) and demonstrated significant lesion growth on follow-up imaging (57%). This included some patients who exhibited low ASL signal before development of diffusion restriction (infarction). CONCLUSION: In patients presenting to the ED with acute stroke symptoms, ASL provides information not available with DWI alone. The NPV of ASL for evaluating patients with acute ischemia was 94%.
PURPOSE: To assess the utility of ASL in evaluating patients presenting to the ED with stroke-like symptoms. METHODS: ASL and DWI images from 526 consecutive patients presenting to the ED with acute stroke symptoms were retrospectively reviewed. DWI images were evaluated for volume of restricted diffusion using ABC/2. ASL maps were evaluated for decreased, normal, or increased signal. The volume of decreased ASL signal was calculated using the same ABC/2 technique. The volume of decreased ASL signal was correlated with the volume of DWI signal abnormality to identify cases of mismatch (DWI:ASL ratio > 1.8) and to correlate this mismatch with infarct growth on imaging follow-up. NIHSS, length of hospital stay, mRS, and future admission for acute stroke-like symptoms were recorded. Correlations between ASL abnormalities and clinical parameters were evaluated using a two-tailed t-test. RESULTS: Of the 526 patients presenting with acute stroke symptoms, 136 patients had an abnormal ASL scan and 388 patients had a normal ASL scan. Of the 136 patients with abnormal ASL, 84 patients had low ASL signal with 79 of these being related to acute infarcts. Elevated ASL signal was seen in 52 patients, of which 30 of these patients had reperfusion hyperemia related to acute infarctions. ASL had a negative predictive value of 94% for evaluating patients with acute ischemic stroke. A subset of patients with abnormal ASL scans with a discharge diagnosis of acute infarction were found to have an ASL:DWI mismatch (ratio > 1.8) and demonstrated significant lesion growth on follow-up imaging (57%). This included some patients who exhibited low ASL signal before development of diffusion restriction (infarction). CONCLUSION: In patients presenting to the ED with acute stroke symptoms, ASL provides information not available with DWI alone. The NPV of ASL for evaluating patients with acute ischemia was 94%.
Authors: H Ay; F S Buonanno; G Rordorf; P W Schaefer; L H Schwamm; O Wu; R G Gonzalez; K Yamada; G A Sorensen; W J Koroshetz Journal: Neurology Date: 1999-06-10 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Patrick C A J Vroomen; Marieke K Buddingh; Gert Jan Luijckx; Jacques De Keyser Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2008 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.136
Authors: K O Lövblad; H J Laubach; A E Baird; F Curtin; G Schlaug; R R Edelman; S Warach Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 1998 Jun-Jul Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: David T Winkler; Felix Fluri; Peter Fuhr; Stephan G Wetzel; Philippe A Lyrer; Stephan Ruegg; Stefan T Engelter Journal: Stroke Date: 2009-01-22 Impact factor: 7.914