Literature DB >> 34663917

Additive genetic variation in Pinus radiata bark chemistry and the chemical traits associated with variation in mammalian bark stripping.

Judith S Nantongo1, Brad M Potts2,3, Noel W Davies4, Hugh Fitzgerald2, Thomas Rodemann4, Julianne M O'Reilly-Wapstra2,3.   

Abstract

Secondary metabolites are suggested as a major mechanism explaining genetic variation in herbivory levels in Pinus radiata. The potential to incorporate these chemical traits into breeding/deployment programmes partly depends on the presence of additive genetic variation for the relevant chemical traits. In this study, near-infrared spectroscopy was used to quantify the constitutive and induced levels of 54 compounds in the bark of trees from 74 P. radiata full-sib families. The trees sampled for chemistry were protected from browsing and induced levels were obtained by subjecting half of the trees to artificial bark stripping. The treatment effect on bark chemistry was assessed along with narrow-sense heritability, the significance of non-additive genetic effects and the additive genetic correlations of compounds with bark stripping by mammalian herbivores that was observed in unprotected replicates of the field trial. The results indicated: (i) significant additive genetic variation, with low-moderate narrow-sense heritability estimates for most compounds; (ii) while significant induced effects were detected for some chemicals, no significant genetic variation in inducibility was detected; and (iii) sugars, fatty acids and a diterpenoid positively genetically correlated while a sesquiterpenoid negatively genetically correlated with bark stripping by the mammalian herbivore, the Bennett's wallaby (Macropus rufogriseus). At the onset of browsing, a trade-off with height was detected for selecting higher amounts of this sesquiterpenoid. However, overall, results showed potential to incorporate chemical traits into breeding/deployment programmes. The quantitative genetic analyses of the near infrared predicted chemical traits produced associations with mammalian bark stripping that mostly conform with those obtained using standard wet chemistry.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Genetics Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34663917      PMCID: PMC8626423          DOI: 10.1038/s41437-021-00476-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  33 in total

1.  Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense.

Authors:  P D Coley; J P Bryant; F S Chapin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-11-22       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  To grow or defend? Pine seedlings grow less but induce more defences when a key resource is limited.

Authors:  Scott Ferrenberg; Jeffrey M Kane; Joseph M Langenhan
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 4.196

Review 3.  Growth-defense tradeoffs in plants: a balancing act to optimize fitness.

Authors:  Bethany Huot; Jian Yao; Beronda L Montgomery; Sheng Yang He
Journal:  Mol Plant       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 13.164

4.  PATTERNS OF PHENOTYPIC AND GENETIC CORRELATIONS AMONG MORPHOLOGICAL AND LIFE-HISTORY TRAITS IN WILD RADISH, RAPHANUS RAPHANISTRUM.

Authors:  Jeffrey Conner; Sara Via
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Genetic variation of piperidine alkaloids in Pinus ponderosa: a common garden study.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Gerson; Rick G Kelsey; J Bradley St Clair
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Induction of anatomically based defense responses in stems of diverse conifers by methyl jasmonate: a phylogenetic perspective.

Authors:  J W Hudgins; Erik Christiansen; Vincent R Franceschi
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.196

7.  Herbivores can select for mixed defensive strategies in plants.

Authors:  Diego Carmona; Juan Fornoni
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 10.151

8.  Metabolic costs of terpenoid accumulation in higher plants.

Authors:  J Gershenzon
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Carbon allocation during defoliation: testing a defense-growth trade-off in balsam fir.

Authors:  Annie Deslauriers; Laurie Caron; Sergio Rossi
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Toxicity of Pine Monoterpenes to Mountain Pine Beetle.

Authors:  Christine C Chiu; Christopher I Keeling; Joerg Bohlmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  2 in total

1.  Phenoplasticity of Essential Oils from Two Species of Piper (Piperaceae): Comparing Wild Specimens and Bi-Generational Monoclonal Cultivars.

Authors:  Ygor Jessé Ramos; Jéssica Sales Felisberto; João Gabriel Gouvêa-Silva; Ulisses Carvalho de Souza; Claudete da Costa-Oliveira; George Azevedo de Queiroz; Elsie Franklin Guimarães; Nicholas John Sadgrove; Davyson de Lima Moreira
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-04

2.  Analysis of the transcriptome of the needles and bark of Pinus radiata induced by bark stripping and methyl jasmonate.

Authors:  J S Nantongo; B M Potts; T Frickey; E Telfer; H Dungey; H Fitzgerald; J M O'Reilly-Wapstra
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 3.969

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.