Literature DB >> 34663676

Central Nervous System Distribution of an Opioid Agonist Combination with Synergistic Activity.

Jessica I Griffith1, Minjee Kim2, Daniel J Bruce2, Cristina D Peterson2, Kelley F Kitto2, Afroz S Mohammad2, Sneha Rathi2, Carolyn A Fairbanks2, George L Wilcox2, William F Elmquist1.   

Abstract

Novel combinations of specific opioid agonists like loperamide and oxymorphindole targeting the µ- and δ-opioid receptors, respectively, have shown increased potency with minimized opioid-associated risks. However, whether their interaction is pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic in nature has not been determined. This study quantitatively determined whether these drugs have a pharmacokinetic interaction that alters systemic disposition or central nervous system (CNS) distribution. We performed intravenous and oral in vivo pharmacokinetic assessments of both drugs after discrete dosing and administration in combination to determine whether the combination had any effect on systemic pharmacokinetic parameters or CNS exposure. Drugs were administered at 5 or 10 mg/kg i.v. or 30 mg/kg orally to institute for cancer research (ICR) mice and 5 mg/kg i.v. to Friend leukemia virus strain B mice of the following genotypes: wild-type, breast cancer resistance protein (Bcrp-/- ) (Bcrp knockout), Mdr1a/b-/- [P-glycoprotein (P-gp) knockout], and Bcrp-/- Mdr1a/b-/- (triple knockout). In the combination, clearance of oxymorphindole (OMI) was reduced by approximately half, and the plasma area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) increased. Consequently, brain and spinal cord AUCs for OMI in the combination also increased proportionately. Both loperamide and OMI are P-gp substrates, but administration of the two drugs in combination does not alter efflux transport at the CNS barriers. Because OMI alone shows appreciable brain penetration but little therapeutic efficacy on its own, and because loperamide's CNS distribution is unchanged in the combination, the mechanism of action for the increased potency of the combination is most likely pharmacodynamic and most likely occurs at receptors in the peripheral nervous system. This combination has favorable characteristics for future development. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Opioids have yet to be replaced as the most effective treatments for moderate-to-severe pain and chronic pain, but their side effects are dangerous. Combinations of opioids with peripheral activity, such as loperamide and oxymorphindole, would be valuable in that they are effective at much lower doses and have reduced risks for dangerous side effects because the µ-opioid receptor agonist is largely excluded from the CNS.
Copyright © 2021 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34663676      PMCID: PMC8969136          DOI: 10.1124/jpet.121.000821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  34 in total

1.  Heterodimerization of mu and delta opioid receptors: A role in opiate synergy.

Authors:  I Gomes; B A Jordan; A Gupta; N Trapaidze; V Nagy; L A Devi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Application of the message-address concept in the design of highly potent and selective non-peptide delta opioid receptor antagonists.

Authors:  P S Portoghese; M Sultana; H Nagase; A E Takemori
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Physical blood-brain barrier disruption induced by focused ultrasound does not overcome the transporter-mediated efflux of erlotinib.

Authors:  Sébastien Goutal; Matthieu Gerstenmayer; Sylvain Auvity; Fabien Caillé; Sébastien Mériaux; Irène Buvat; Benoit Larrat; Nicolas Tournier
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 9.776

4.  Estimation of variance for AUC in animal studies.

Authors:  J Yuan
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.534

5.  Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies of agmatine after spinal administration in the mouse.

Authors:  John C Roberts; Brent M Grocholski; Kelley F Kitto; Carolyn A Fairbanks
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 4.030

6.  Disposition and metabolism of [14C]loperamide in rats.

Authors:  H Miyazaki; K Nambu; Y Matsunaga; M Hashimoto
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 2.441

7.  Topical Application of Loperamide/Oxymorphindole, Mu and Delta Opioid Receptor Agonists, Reduces Sensitization of C-fiber Nociceptors that Possess NaV1.8.

Authors:  Megan L Uhelski; Daniel Bruce; Rebecca Speltz; George L Wilcox; Donald A Simone
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Agonist and antagonist activities of ligands derived from naltrexone and oxymorphone.

Authors:  A E Takemori; M Sultana; H Nagase; P S Portoghese
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 5.037

9.  Ligand requirements for involvement of PKCε in synergistic analgesic interactions between spinal μ and δ opioid receptors.

Authors:  D J Schuster; M D Metcalf; K F Kitto; R O Messing; C A Fairbanks; G L Wilcox
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 8.739

10.  Prevalence and Profile of High-Impact Chronic Pain in the United States.

Authors:  Mark H Pitcher; Michael Von Korff; M Catherine Bushnell; Linda Porter
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 5.820

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.