| Literature DB >> 34663445 |
Ivo Elliott1,2, Neeranuch Thangnimitchok3, Kittipong Chaisiri4, Tri Wangrangsimakul5,6, Piangnet Jaiboon6, Nicholas P J Day5,6, Daniel H Paris7,8, Paul N Newton3,5,6, Serge Morand9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Scrub typhus is an important neglected vector-borne zoonotic disease across the Asia-Pacific region, with an expanding known distribution. The disease ecology is poorly understood, despite the large global burden of disease. The key determinants of high-risk areas of transmission to humans are unknown.Entities:
Keywords: Chigger; Ecology; Orientia tsutsugamushi; Scrub typhus; Thailand
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34663445 PMCID: PMC8524837 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-021-05042-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Study site locations, Chiang Rai Province, Thailand
PCR testing for Orientia tsutsugamushi on spleen, lung and liver tissue (aggregate results) of different small mammal species by site
| Study site | Ban Song Kwair (BSK) (%) | Ban Mae Mon (BMM) (%) | Ban Thoet Thai (BTT) (%) | Total (% positive) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| – | – | 5/21 (24) | 21 (23.8) | |
| – | – | 0/1 (0) | 1 (0) | |
| – | 1/1 (100) | 0/2 (0) | 4 (25) | |
| 0/1 (0) | – | – | 1 (0) | |
| 0/3 (0) | – | – | 3 (0) | |
| 0/1 (0) | 0/3 (0) | – | 4 (0) | |
| – | 0/1 (0) | 0/1 (0) | 2 (0) | |
| – | 1/8 (13) | 1/2 (50) | 10 (20) | |
| – | – | 0/1 (0) | 2 (0) | |
| 6/19 (32) | – | – | 19 (31.5) | |
| 3/16 (19) | – | 1/2 (50) | 18 (22.2) | |
| 2/8 (25) | 0/1 (0) | 0/1 (0) | 10 (20) | |
| 2/2 (100) | – | – | 2 (100) | |
| 3/13 (23) | 5/20 (25) | 8/17 (47) | 50 (32) | |
| – | 0/2 (0) | – | 2 (0) | |
| 0/1 (0) | 0/5 (0) | – | 6 (0) | |
| Total | 16/64 (25) | 7/43 (16) | 15/48 (31) | 155 (24.5) |
Fig. 2Mean chigger index for all trapped animals at each field visit, by study site
Orientia tsutsugamushi PCR testing on individual chiggers and other acarines
| Study site | Ban Song Kwair (BSK) (%) | Ban Mae Mon (BMM) (%) | Ban Thoet Thai (BTT) (%) | Total (% PCR positive) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0/39 (0) | 0/10 (0) | 0/1 (0) | 50 (0) | ||||
| – | 0/1 (0) | – | 1 (0) | ||||
| 0/2 (0) | 0/1 (0) | – | 3 (0) | ||||
| 0/1 (0) | – | – | 1 (0) | ||||
| 0/3 (0) | 0/6 (0) | 0/1 (0) | 10 (0) | ||||
| – | |||||||
| 0/3 (0) | – | – | 3 (0) | ||||
| 0/6 (0) | 0/4 (0) | – | 10 (0) | ||||
| – | – | 0/2 (0) | 2 (0) | ||||
| – | 0/11 (0) | – | 11 (0) | ||||
| 0/1 (0) | – | – | 1 (0) | ||||
| 0/2 (0) | 0/1 (0) | 0/4 (0) | 7 (0) | ||||
| – | 0/1 (0) | – | 1 (0) | ||||
| – | 0/2 (0) | – | 2 (0) | ||||
| – | 0/4 (0) | – | 4 (0) | ||||
| 0/2 (0) | 0/1 (0) | 0/2 (0) | 5 (0) | ||||
| 0/1 (0) | 0/13 (0) | – | 14 (0) | ||||
| – | – | 0/1 (0) | 1 (0) | ||||
| 0/2 (0) | – | – | 2 (0) | ||||
| 0/8 (0) | – | – | 8 (0) | ||||
| – | |||||||
| 0/1 (0) | – | – | 1 (0) | ||||
| 0/1 (0) | 0/17 (0) | – | 18 (0) | ||||
| – | 0/1 (0) | – | 1 (0) | ||||
| – | – | ||||||
| – | 0/4 (0) | – | 4 (0) | ||||
| – | 0/2 (0) | – | 2 (0) | ||||
| – | 0/3 (0) | – | 3 (0) | ||||
| 0/4 (0) | 0/2 (0) | – | 6 (0) | ||||
| – | – | 0/2 (0) | 2 (0) | ||||
| – | |||||||
| 0/1 (0) | 0/18 (0) | 0/7 (0) | 26 (0) | ||||
| – | 0/1 (0) | – | 1 (0) | ||||
| 0/7 (0) | – | – | 7 (0) | ||||
| – | – | 0/2 (0) | 2 (0) | ||||
| – | 0/4 (0) | – | 4 (0) | ||||
| – | 0/2 (0) | – | 2 (0) | ||||
| 0/1 (0) | – | – | 1 (0) | ||||
Species with positive PCR results are indicated in bold
aIndicates other Acari removed from small mammals by site
bIndicates species not previously reported as O. tsutsugamushi positive
Fig. 3Proportion of chigger pools that tested positive for Orientia tsutsugamushi by PCR according to time of year collected, by study site
PCR testing for Orientia tsutsugamushi on individual free-living chiggers
| Chigger species | PCR negative | PCR positive (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 6 | ||
| 22 | ||
| 7 | ||
| 4 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 1 | 0 | |
| Total | 66 |
Positive PCR results are indicated in bold
Fig. 4Rarefaction curves for chigger species richness at each study site. The curves represent mean chigger species richness, and the bars indicate the standard deviation
Fig. 5Quantitative bipartite network figures (left column) and sub-community modules (right column) for small mammal-chigger interactions. The degree of shading of the module blue boxes reflects the size of the small mammal–chigger species pair interaction
Fig. 6Unipartite network models for small mammal–chigger interactions. The modules are shown by different colours. The most centrally located node has an Eigenvector score closest to 1
Fig. 7Non-quantitative nestedness matrix, bipartitie network and sub-community modules for chigger–small mammal interactions where either species tested O. tsutsugamushi positive
Fig. 8LDA for site variables (elevation, low and medium resolution habitat type and season) at each study site. Elevation is given in meters above sea level. Abbreviations: LDA, Linear discriminant analysis
Fig. 9Generalised linear (mixed) model analysis of the effect of low-resolution habitat type, season and elevation on the probability of infection with O. tsutsugamushi (PCR positive) in chigger pools (a), rodents (b) and combined chigger pools and rodents (c)