| Literature DB >> 34663371 |
Feifei Ni1, Yanchao Zhang2, Yi Peng3, Xiaoxiao Peng4, Jianjun Li5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the association between serum receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (sRANKL) levels and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in Chinese patients.Entities:
Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis; China; Meta-analysis; Pathogenesis; RANKL
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34663371 PMCID: PMC8522048 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02721-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Fig. 1Study selection flow chart
Characteristics of included studies
| Author | Year | Region | Language | Study type | Criteria for disease | Case | Control | Case | Control | Case | Control | Disease durations | Source for control | Method | NOS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| An et at. | 2010 | Hebei | Chinese | Case–control | New York (1984) | 30 | 20 | 30/0 | 20/0 | 28 ± 8 | 30 ± 5 | 7 ± 7 | HB | Elisa | 7 |
| Shen et al. | 2019 | Liaoning | Chinese | Case–control | New York (1984) | 202 | 98 | 102/100 | 49/49 | 43.4 (24–65) | 44.8 (22–65) | – | HB | Elisa | 7 |
| Chen et al. | 2010 | Taiwan | English | Case–control | New York (1984) | 42 | 26 | 38/4 | – | 33.6 ± 12.14 | – | 8.17 ± 8.2 | NA | Elisa | 7 |
| Hou et al. | 2018 | Shandong | English | Case–control | New York (1984) | 40 | 40 | 31/9 | 31/9 | 31.7 ± 2.1 | 31.4 ± 2.5 | 7.4 ± 1.9 | PB | Elisa | 7 |
| Li et al. | 2013 | Guangdong | Chinese | Case–control | New York (1984) | 44 | 15 | 32/12 | 9/6 | 31 ± 0.7 | 29 ± 0.4 | – | HB | Elisa | 7 |
| Luo et al. | 2011 | Jiangsu | Chinese | Case–control | New York (1984) | 44 | 44 | 23/21 | 22/22 | 42.2 ± 11.9 | 4. ± 11.1 | 7.3 ± 4.8 | HB | Elisa | 7 |
| Wei et al. | 2013 | Guangdong | Chinese | Case–control | New York (1984) | 40 | 40 | 40/0 | 40/0 | 33.67 ± 6.88 | 30.95 ± 6.04 | 12.63 ± 9.68 | NA | Elisa | 7 |
| Zhang et al. | 2018 | Hebei | Chinese | Case–control | New York (1984) | 46 | 38 | 30/16 | 28/10 | 27.2 ± 8 | 25.26 ± 8.67 | 7.6 ± 3.8 | HB | Elisa | 7 |
| Zhao et al. | 2010 | Fujian | Chinese | Case–control | New York (1984) | 23 | 17 | 16/7 | 9/8 | 33 ± 14 | 52 ± 14 | – | PB | Elisa | 7 |
| Huang et al. | 2018 | Zhejiang | Chinese | Case–control | New York (1984) | 21 | 42 | 6/15 | 15/26 | 44.48 ± 19.77 | 46.24 ± 17.79 | – | HB | Elisa | 7 |
| Zhang et al. | 2015 | Guangdong | Chinese | Case–control | ASAS | 21 | 21 | 18/4 | 17/5 | 31 ± 9 | 30 ± 9 | 6 ± 3 | HB | Elisa | 7 |
| Zhang et al. | 2020 | Guangdong | English | Case–control | ASAS | 32 | 22 | 25/7 | 18/4 | 28.5 (15–26) | 30.5 (18–56) | 4.68 ± 3.63 | PB | Elisa | 7 |
| Province | Years |
M = male, F = female. NOS = Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, HB = hospital based, PB = population based
Fig. 2Forest plot of sRANKL: patients with AS versus controls
Fig. 3sRANKL level, language, source of control, and ethnicity: cases versus controls
Fig. 4sRANKL level, the BASDAI, the BASFI, age, and duration: cases versus controls
Fig. 5sOPG levels and RANKL/OPG ratio: cases versus controls
Fig. 6Forest plot in the sensitivity analysis. CI: confidence interval
Fig. 7Shape of the funnel plot. Egger’s test, t = 2.16, P = 0.056