BACKGROUND: In performing left bundle branch pacing (LBBP), various QRS morphologies are observed as the lead penetrates the ventricular septum (VS). This study aimed to evaluate these characteristics and infer the mechanism underlying each QRS morphology. METHODS: In 19 patients who met the strict criteria for LBB capture, we classified the QRS morphologies observed during the LBBP procedure into seven patterns, the first five of which were determined by the depth of penetration: right ventricular septal pacing (RVSP), intraventricular septal pacing (IVSP1 and IVSP2), endocardial side of left ventricular septal pacing (LVSeP), nonselective LBBP (NS-LBBP), selective LBBP (S-LBBP), and NS-LBBP with anodal capture. The parameters of the QRS morphologies in these seven patterns were evaluated. RESULTS: Among the first five patterns, stimulus-QRSend duration (s-QRSend) was the narrowest in IVSP1 rather than in NS-LBBP, and stimulus-to-peak of R wave in V6 (s-LVAT) was significantly shortened in two steps, from RVSP to IVSP1 (96 ± 11; 82 ± 8 ms, p < .01) and from LVSeP to NS-LBBP (76 ± 7; 60 ± 4 ms, p < .01). The late-R duration in V1 was significantly prolonged in the order of LVSeP, NS-LBBP, and S-LBBP (45 ± 7; 53 ± 10; 71 ± 15 ms, respectively, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: s-QRSend was the narrowest in IVSP1 rather than in NS-LBBP among the QRS morphologies observed during lead penetration through the VS. The prolonged late-R duration in V1 and abrupt shortening of the s-LVAT in V6 may help determine LBB capture during lead penetration.
BACKGROUND: In performing left bundle branch pacing (LBBP), various QRS morphologies are observed as the lead penetrates the ventricular septum (VS). This study aimed to evaluate these characteristics and infer the mechanism underlying each QRS morphology. METHODS: In 19 patients who met the strict criteria for LBB capture, we classified the QRS morphologies observed during the LBBP procedure into seven patterns, the first five of which were determined by the depth of penetration: right ventricular septal pacing (RVSP), intraventricular septal pacing (IVSP1 and IVSP2), endocardial side of left ventricular septal pacing (LVSeP), nonselective LBBP (NS-LBBP), selective LBBP (S-LBBP), and NS-LBBP with anodal capture. The parameters of the QRS morphologies in these seven patterns were evaluated. RESULTS: Among the first five patterns, stimulus-QRSend duration (s-QRSend) was the narrowest in IVSP1 rather than in NS-LBBP, and stimulus-to-peak of R wave in V6 (s-LVAT) was significantly shortened in two steps, from RVSP to IVSP1 (96 ± 11; 82 ± 8 ms, p < .01) and from LVSeP to NS-LBBP (76 ± 7; 60 ± 4 ms, p < .01). The late-R duration in V1 was significantly prolonged in the order of LVSeP, NS-LBBP, and S-LBBP (45 ± 7; 53 ± 10; 71 ± 15 ms, respectively, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: s-QRSend was the narrowest in IVSP1 rather than in NS-LBBP among the QRS morphologies observed during lead penetration through the VS. The prolonged late-R duration in V1 and abrupt shortening of the s-LVAT in V6 may help determine LBB capture during lead penetration.