| Literature DB >> 34662237 |
Yashasvika Duggal1, Jennifer E Kurasz2, Benjamin M Fontaine3, Nick J Marotta4, Shikha S Chauhan5, Anna C Karls2, Emily E Weinert1,5.
Abstract
Organismal adaptations to environmental stimuli are governed by intracellular signaling molecules such as nucleotide second messengers. Recent studies have identified functional roles for the noncanonical 2',3'-cyclic nucleotide monophosphates (2',3'-cNMPs) in both eukaryotes and prokaryotes. In Escherichia coli, 2',3'-cNMPs are produced by RNase I-catalyzed RNA degradation, and these cyclic nucleotides modulate biofilm formation through unknown mechanisms. The present work dissects cellular processes in E. coli and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium that are modulated by 2',3'-cNMPs through the development of cell-permeable 2',3'-cNMP analogs and a 2',3'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase. Utilization of these chemical and enzymatic tools, in conjunction with phenotypic and transcriptomic investigations, identified pathways regulated by 2',3'-cNMPs, including flagellar motility and biofilm formation, and by oligoribonucleotides with 3'-terminal 2',3'-cyclic phosphates, including responses to cellular stress. Furthermore, interrogation of metabolomic and organismal databases has identified 2',3'-cNMPs in numerous organisms and homologs of the E. coli metabolic proteins that are involved in key eukaryotic pathways. Thus, the present work provides key insights into the roles of these understudied facets of nucleotide metabolism and signaling in prokaryotic physiology and suggest broad roles for 2',3'-cNMPs among bacteria and eukaryotes. IMPORTANCE Bacteria adapt to environmental challenges by producing intracellular signaling molecules that control downstream pathways and alter cellular processes for survival. Nucleotide second messengers serve to transduce extracellular signals and regulate a wide array of intracellular pathways. Recently, 2',3'-cyclic nucleotide monophosphates (2',3'-cNMPs) were identified as contributing to the regulation of cellular pathways in eukaryotes and prokaryotes. In this study, we define previously unknown cell processes that are affected by fluctuating 2',3'-cNMP levels or RNA oligomers with 2',3'-cyclic phosphate termini in E. coli and Salmonella Typhimurium, providing a framework for studying novel signaling networks in prokaryotes. Furthermore, we utilize metabolomics databases to identify additional prokaryotic and eukaryotic species that generate 2',3'-cNMPs as a resource for future studies.Entities:
Keywords: RNA degradation; RNA repair; biofilms; cyclic nucleotides; flagellar motility; metabolomics; transcriptomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34662237 PMCID: PMC8765455 DOI: 10.1128/JB.00208-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Bacteriol ISSN: 0021-9193 Impact factor: 3.490
CNPase-dependent differentially expressed genes in E. coli and/or S. Typhimurium relevant to this study
| Function or gene | Product | log2FC WT CNP/CNP-inact (log2FC Δ | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Flagellar assembly | |||
| | Flagellar basal body component | 1.80 | NS |
| | Flagellar export pore protein | 1.26 | NS |
| | Flagellar basal body rod protein | NS | 2.35 (1.17) |
| | Flagellar basal body rod protein | NS | 2.33 (1.15) |
| | Flagellar basal body rod modification protein | NS | 2.14 (1.18) |
| | Peptidoglycan hydrolase | NS | 1.60 |
| EPS production and/or biofilm | |||
| | Curli assembly protein | 1.90 | NS |
| | Type IV pilin biogenesis assembly protein | 1.05 | NS |
| | Poly-beta-1,6- | 1.39 | NS |
| | PGA synthase catalytic subunit | 1.49 | NS |
| | PGA synthase catalytic subunit | 1.22 | NS |
| | Fimbria-like protein | 1.77 | NS |
| | Fimbria-like protein | 2.43 | NS |
| | Putative fimbria-like adhesin protein | 1.92 | NS |
| | Putative fimbria-like adhesin protein | 2.01 | NS |
| | Putative fimbria-like adhesin protein | 1.48 | NS |
| | Putative fimbria-like adhesin protein | 1.86 | NS |
| | Putative fimbria-like adhesin protein | 2.19 | NS |
| | Phosphomannomutase, colanic acid synthesis | NS | −1.81 |
| | GDP- | NS | −2.03 |
| | Mannose-1-phosphate guanylyl-transferase, colanic acid synthesis | NS | −1.72 |
| | Putative colanic acid polymerase | 1.48 | NS |
| | Glycosyl transferase, colanic acid synthesis | NS | −1.47 |
| | Putative colanic acid biosynthesis acetyltransferase | NS | −1.48 |
|
| GDP-fucose synthetase, colanic acid synthesis | NS | −2.06 |
|
| Glycosyl transferase, colanic acid synthesis | NS | −1.92 |
|
| Tyrosine phosphatase, regulator of colanic acid synthesis | NS | −2.13 |
|
| Putative EPS production OM protein | 1.39 | −1.57 |
|
| Putative EPS production OM protein | 1.37 | −1.27 |
|
| DUF940 family EPS protein | 1.18 | NS |
| Acid resistance | |||
|
| Lysine decarboxylase | 1.74 | NS |
|
| 1.71 (1.60) | ||
|
| Arginine/agmatine antiporter | 1.42 (3.15) | |
|
| Glutamate decarboxylase alpha | 1.97 (4.71) | NS |
|
| Glutamate decarboxylase beta | 2.90 (4.11) | NS |
|
| Glutamate/gamma-aminobutyric acid antiporter | 2.12 (3.96) | NS |
|
| Transcriptional activator of | 2.18 | NS |
|
| Glutamine permease | 1.20 (2.17) | |
|
| Acid stress response chaperone | 2.26 (4.40) | NS |
|
| Acid stress response chaperone | 2.58 (4.76) | NS |
|
| Acid resistance IM protein | 2.10 (4.39) | NS |
|
| Glutamate/gamma-aminobutyric acid antiporter | 1.28 | NS |
|
| Uncharacterized protein involved in acid stress response | 1.95 | NS |
|
| Acetyl coenzyme A:oxalate coenzyme A transferase | 1.73 | NS |
|
| Uncharacterized acid stress protein | 1.34 | NS |
|
| Putative Mg2+ transporter | 2.56 (3.76) | NS |
|
| Acid resistance IM protein | 1.70 (2.26) | NS |
|
| Transcriptional regulator of acid metabolite gene C4 transporter | 2.36 (3.14) | |
|
| Acid resistance OM lipoprotein | 1.97 (3.31) | |
|
| Acid stress-induced protein | 1.50 | NS |
| RNA repair | |||
|
| Rsr ribonucleoprotein-related protein | NS | −3.67 (−5.70) |
|
| RNA 3′-terminal phosphate cyclase | NS | −3.86 (−4.44) |
|
| RNA ligase | NS | −3.80 (−4.78) |
| Heat shock response | |||
|
| Chaperone Hsp40 | −1.11 | −1.63 (−2.36) |
|
| Chaperone Hsp70 | −1.34 | NS |
|
| DnaK cochaperone | −1.04 | NS |
|
| Heat shock chaperone | −1.38 | −2.99 (−3.58) |
|
| Heat shock protein | NS | −2.98 (−3.25) |
| Peroxide stress (SOS response) | |||
|
| SOS response protein | NS | −1.54 |
|
| DNA damage-inducible protein | NS | −1.74 |
|
| Recombination and repair protein | NS | −2.21 (−1.59) |
|
| DNA polymerase V subunit | NS | −1.30 |
|
| DNA polymerase V subunit | NS | −1.71 |
|
| DNA damage-inducible protein | NS | −2.08 (−1.61) |
| Anaerobic respiration | |||
|
| Assembly protein for nitrate reductase | −2.90 | NS |
|
| Periplasmic nitrate reductase | −2.90 | NS |
|
| Periplasmic nitrate reductase | −3.18 | NS |
|
| Nitrite reductase subunit | −2.02 | NS |
| Amino acid biosynthesis | |||
|
| Tryptophan synthase alpha subunit | −2.77 | NS |
|
| Tryptophan synthase beta subunit | −2.83 | NS |
|
| Tryptophan biosynthesis protein | −2.44 | NS |
|
| Tryptophan biosynthesis protein | −2.29 | NS |
|
| Glutamine synthetase | −1.50 | NS |
log2 fold changes (log2FC) in transcript levels for E. coli or S. Typhimurium WT CNP/CNP-inact and Δrna CNP/CNP-inact (in parentheses). NS, indicates that transcript levels changed <2-fold or were not statistically significant.
FIG 1Global gene analysis reveals 2′,3′-cNMP-modulated cellular processes. Functional categorization of differentially expressed genes in Escherichia coli (A and B) and Salmonella Typhimurium (C and D) expressing CNPase compared to those in strains expressing CNP-inact. Pie charts were generated using the Panther Gene Ontology Database (http://pantherdb.org/). Differentially regulated protein classes were determined based on genes that are upregulated by expression of CNPase (A and C) and genes that are downregulated by expression of CNPase (B and D). Gene expression data were obtained from analysis of 3 biological replicates that were significantly differentially expressed (adjusted P [Padj] < 0.05; >2-fold change in expression).
FIG 2Modulation of 2′,3′-cNMPs impacts E. coli physiology. (A and B) E. coli BW25113 Δrna is hypermotile relative to the wild type (WT), and treatment with 1 mM cell-permeable 5′-O-butyryl 2′,3′-cAMP (Bt-cAMP) (A) or 5′-O-butyryl 2′,3′-cUMP (Bt-cUMP) (B) inhibits its hypermotility. (C) Motility of BW25113 WT cells is not impacted by 2′,3′-cNMP hydrolysis through CNPase expression relative to a control strain expressing CNP-inact. (D) FliC expression is unaltered in a Δrna mutant treated with 1 mM Bt-cAMP or Bt-cUMP; the “#” symbol indicates that fliC transcript levels were undetectable in the untreated and treated WT cells. (E) Biofilm production is increased in the Δrna mutant relative to that in WT, and treatment with 500 μM Bt-cAMP impairs hyperbiofilm formation. Biofilm was quantified using Congo red staining. (F) Hydrolysis of 2′,3′-cNMPs by CNPase enhances cell survival during acid stress compared to that of a control strain expressing CNP-inact. All data shown are representative of 3 biological replicates; error bars represent ±1 standard deviation. (A and B) Statistical significance was determined by a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni and Holm used as post hoc tests to determine significance between samples. A P value of <0.01 was considered statistically significant. (C, E, and F) Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t test (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001).
FIG 3Quantification of 2′,3′-cNMPs in Salmonella Typhimurium. 2′,3′-cAMP, -cGMP, -cCMP, and cUMP levels were quantified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis. (A) WT or Δrna cells were harvested at the mid-log (optical density at 600 nm [OD600] = 0.5), early stationary (OD600 = 0.9), and late stationary phases (24 h after the onset of growth) to determine growth phase-dependent fluctuations in 2′,3′-cNMP levels. The “#” symbol represents 2′,3′-cNMP levels that were below the level of detection in the Δrna strain. None of the differences in cyclic nucleotide levels between time points were statistically significant. (B) WT cells expressing CNPase or CNP-inact from pKT-CNP or pKT-CNP-inact were harvested at the mid-log phase for transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis. Analysis confirmed depletion of all four 2′,3′-cNMPs when CNPase was expressed. Only the levels of 2′,3′-cAMP showed statistical significance when CNPase was expressed, with a P value of <0.05. All 2′,3′-cNMP levels are representative of 3 biological replicates; error bars represent ±1 standard deviation. All data shown are representative of 3 biological replicates. Statistical significance was determined by a one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni and Holm used as post hoc tests to determine significance between samples.
FIG 4Physiological impacts of depletion of 2′,3′-cNMPs in S. Typhimurium. Heat shock survival (A) and peroxide stress survival (B) assays do not reveal significant differences between strains expressing CNPase versus CNP-inact. For heat shock survival, cells were transitioned from 30°C to 50°C and assessed after 4 h. Survival is denoted as CFU per milliliter upon completion of the high temperature treatment divided by CFU per milliliter of the culture at the time of the transition. For peroxide stress, survival is denoted as CFU per milliliter after 2 h of treatment with 3.5 mM or 7 mM H2O2 relative to that of an untreated control. An ΔrecA strain was used as a control for H2O2 sensitivity. Each dot denotes one biological replicate with 3 technical replicates; gray bars denote the mean. (C) Activation of the rsr-yrlBA-rtcBA RNA repair operon is impaired during expression of CNPase from pKT-CNP but not in an Δrna mutant. Reporter strains were generated such that XylE activity is directly proportional to the level of activation of the RNA repair operon promoter. Cells were treated with mitomycin C (MMC) as an activating condition or left untreated as a control. Data are representative of 5 biological replicates with 2 technical replicates. (D) 2′,3′-cNMP levels were not significantly altered by MMC treatment. The designated strains, 14028s WT with or without pBAD33-CNP/pBAD33-CNP-inact or Δrna, were treated with MMC or were left untreated for comparison prior to 2′,3′-cNMP extraction and quantification by LC-MS/MS. (E) There was no significant difference in exopolysaccharide (EPS) production/biofilm formation when comparing strains expressing CNPase or CNP-inact, as quantified by Congo red staining. (F) Expression of either CNPase or CNP-inact from the pKT vectors significantly reduced WT motility relative to that of the WT without the plasmid; the Δrna strain did not exhibit significantly altered motility compared to that of the WT. Except where otherwise stated, all data are representative of at least 3 biological replicates; error bars represent ±1 standard deviation. Statistical significance was determined by a one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni and Holm used as post hoc tests to determine significance between samples. A P value of <0.001 (***) or <0.01 (**) was considered statistically significant.
Organisms known to contain 2′,3′-cyclic nucleotide monophosphates
| Organism | 2′,3′-cNMP(s) detected | Database | Source and/or reference(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bacteria | |||
| | cAMP, cGMP, cCMP, cUMP | ||
| | cCMP, cUMP |
| |
| | cAMP, cGMP, cCMP, cUMP | This study | |
| | cAMP |
| |
| Animals | |||
| | cAMP, cGMP, cCMP, cUMP | MW | |
| | cAMP, cGMP, cCMP, cUMP | MW | |
| | cAMP, cGMP, cCMP, cUMP |
| |
| Rabbit | cAMP, cGMP |
| |
| Plant | |||
| | cAMP, cGMP, cCMP | ||
| | cAMP, cGMP, cCMP |
| |