| Literature DB >> 34662190 |
Adam S Komorowski1,2, Anthony D Bai2,3, Anna Cvetkovic4, Omar Mourad4, Carson K L Lo4, Xena X Li1,4, Vaibhav Mokashi4, Aidan Findlater4, D Brody Duncan1, Charlotte Fuller1, Daniela L Leto1,4, Deborah Yamamura1,4, Dominik Mertz4.
Abstract
Noninferiority randomized controlled trial (RCT) effectiveness may erode when results favor the active control over time and when a decreasingly effective control arm is used in serial trials. We analyzed 32 antifungal noninferiority RCTs (NI-RCTs) for these scenarios in this secondary analysis of a systematic review. Our exploratory analysis suggests that the erosion risk in the effectiveness of antifungal noninferiority trials is uncommon. Findings are limited by small sample size and overall risk of bias.Entities:
Keywords: anti-infective agents; antifungal agents; biocreep; noninferiority trials; systematic review
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34662190 PMCID: PMC8765287 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01627-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother ISSN: 0066-4804 Impact factor: 5.938