Literature DB >> 34661814

The limits of small-for-gestational-age as a high-risk category.

Allen J Wilcox1,2, Marianna Cortese3,4, D Robert McConnaughey5, Dag Moster6,7, Olga Basso8,9.   

Abstract

SGA (small for gestational age) is widely used to identify high-risk infants, although with inconsistent definitions. Cut points range from 2.5th to 10th percentile of birthweight-for-gestational age. We used receiver operator characteristic curves (ROC) to identify the cut point with maximum sensitivity and specificity (Youden Index), and the area under the curve (AUC), which assesses overall discriminating power. Analysis was conducted on 3,836,034 US births (2015) and 292,279 Norwegian births (2010-14). Birthweight percentiles were calculated using exact birthweights at each week of gestational age, and then summarized across gestational ages. We also conducted a companion analysis of gestational age itself to consider the predictive power of gestational week of birth. Outcomes were neonatal mortality and cerebral palsy, both strongly associated with birthweight. Birthweight percentiles performed poorly in all analyses. The AUC for birthweight percentiles as a discriminator of neonatal mortality was 60% (where 50% is no better than a coin-toss). At such low discrimination, the Youden Index provides no useful SGA cut point. Results in Norway were virtually identical, with an AUC of 58%. The AUC with cerebral palsy as the outcome was even lower, at 54%. In contrast, gestational age had an AUC of 85% as a predictor of neonatal mortality, with < 37 weeks as the optimum cut point. SGA provides surprisingly poor identification of at-risk infants, while gestational age performs well. Similar results in two countries that differ in mean birthweight, percent preterm, and neonatal mortality suggest robustness across populations.
© 2021. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Birthweight; Gestational age; Neonatal mortality; Preterm; Receiver operator curve; SGA

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34661814     DOI: 10.1007/s10654-021-00810-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  2 in total

1.  PREMATURITY: A MORE PRECISE APPROACH TO IDENTIFICATION.

Authors:  A O ANCTIL; G B JOSHI; W E LUCAS; W A LITTLE; D A CALLAGAN
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1964-11       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Births: Final Data for 2014.

Authors:  Brady E Hamilton; Joyce A Martin; Michelle J K Osterman; Sally C Curtin; T J Matthews
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2015-12
  2 in total
  3 in total

1.  Re: The limits of small-for-gestational-age as a high-risk category.

Authors:  Lin Yang; Thomas Waldhoer
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Perinatal Risks of Neonatal and Infant Mortalities in a Sub-provincial Region of China: A Livebirth Population-based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Yaling Xu; Xiaojing Guo; Zhaojun Pan; Guofang Zheng; Xiaoqiong Li; Tingting Qi; Xiaoqin Zhu; Hui Wang; Weijie Ding; Zhaofang Tian; Haijun Wang; Hongni Yue; Bo Sun
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 3.105

3.  Predictive models for small-for-gestational-age births in women exposed to pesticides before pregnancy based on multiple machine learning algorithms.

Authors:  Xi Bai; Zhibo Zhou; Mingliang Su; Yansheng Li; Liuqing Yang; Kejia Liu; Hongbo Yang; Huijuan Zhu; Shi Chen; Hui Pan
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-08-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.