| Literature DB >> 34661622 |
Atsuhiko Fukuto1,2, Soohyun Kim1, Jennifer Kang1, Brooke L Gates1, Maggie W Chang1, Kent E Pinkerton3,4, Laura S Van Winkle3,4, Yoshiaki Kiuchi2, Christopher J Murphy1,5, Brian C Leonard1, Sara M Thomasy1,5.
Abstract
Purpose: Corneal keratocyte-fibroblast-myofibroblast (KFM) transformation plays a critical role in corneal stromal wound healing. However, the impact of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs), found in an increasing number of commercial products, on this process is poorly studied. This study investigates the effects of metal oxide ENMs on KFM transformation in vitro and in vivo.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34661622 PMCID: PMC8525860 DOI: 10.1167/tvst.10.12.23
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol ISSN: 2164-2591 Impact factor: 3.283
Figure 1.Rabbit corneal fibroblast cell viability was markedly reduced following treatment with some metal oxide ENMs. The MTT (A) and calcein AM (B) assays exhibited similar cell viability results for 11 metal oxide ENMs except for TiO2. The V2O5, Fe2O3, CuO, and ZnO ENMs exerted more potent cytotoxic effects than the other metal oxide ENMs. The heatmaps represent corneal fibroblast cell viability percentage relative to vehicle control. In the heatmaps, purple and red indicate a high and low percentage of cell viability. *P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparisons test was performed to compare with the vehicle (DW) controls. DW, deionized water; Au NP, gold nanoparticle; MgO, magnesium oxide; Al2O3, aluminum oxide; TiO2, titanium dioxide; Fe2O3, iron(III) oxide; CuO, copper(II) oxide; ZnO, zinc oxide; CeO2, cerium(IV) oxide; WO3, tungsten trioxide.
Figure 2.The V2O5 nanoflake decreased and Fe2O3 NP increased TGF-β1-induced mRNA expression of αSMA, but only V2O5 nanoflake significantly altered αSMA protein expression. (A) Gene expression of αSMA was analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR with normalization against GAPDH. (B) Representative western blot images showing the expression of αSMA and GAPDH. (C) Protein expression of αSMA was analyzed by western blotting with normalization against GAPDH. The data represent mean ± SD. n ≥ 3. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparisons test was performed to compare with TGF-β1 treatment only.
Figure 3.Stromal haze formation and αSMA expression did not significantly differ between rabbits treated with topical Fe2O3 NP or vehicle control (BSS). (A) Representative images of corneal epithelial wound healing in rabbits treated with topical Fe2O3 NP or BSS six times daily following a PTK. (B) No significant differences are identified between Fe2O3 and BSS treated groups at all time points. (C) Representative anterior segment SD-OCT images of the normal cornea (C, top row) and stromal haze (C, bottom row). At 14 days after PTK treatment, the hyperreflective stromal haze was observed in the central anterior stroma and was similar between groups. (D) Stromal haze thickness showed no significant differences between Fe2O3 NP- and BSS-treated groups at all time points. (E) Representative image of immunohistochemical staining for αSMA (green) in the central anterior stroma. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). (F) Bar graph showing the averages of corrected total cell fluorescence (CTCF) for αSMA. No significant differences in the CTCF were observed between Fe2O3 NP- and BSS-treated groups. Data are represented as mean ± SD.