| Literature DB >> 34660782 |
Yan-Yun Liu1, Li-Hua Yu2, Juan Zhang3, Dao-Jun Xie3, Xin-Xiang Zhang1, Jia-Ming Yu1.
Abstract
This study is aimed at exploring the possible mechanism of action of the Suanzaoren decoction (SZRD) in the treatment of Parkinson's disease with sleep disorder (PDSD) based on network pharmacology and molecular docking. Traditional Chinese Medicine Systems Pharmacology (TCMSP) was used to screen the bioactive components and targets of SZRD, and their targets were standardized using the UniProt platform. The disease targets of "Parkinson's disease (PD)" and "Sleep disorder (SD)" were collected by OMIM, GeneCards, and DisGeNET databases. Thereafter, the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed using the STRING platform and visualized by Cytoscape (3.7.2) software. Then, the DAVID platform was used to analyze the Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway. Cytoscape (3.7.2) software was also used to construct the network of the "herb-component-target-pathway." The core active ingredients and core action targets of the drug were verified by molecular docking using AutoDock software. A total of 135 Chinese herbal components and 41 corresponding targets were predicted for the treatment of PDSD using SZRD. Fifteen important signaling pathways were screened, such as the cancer pathway, TNF signaling pathway, PI3K-AKT signaling pathway, HIF-1 signaling pathway, and Toll-like receptor signaling pathway. The results of molecular docking showed that the main active compounds could bind to the representative targets and exhibit good affinity. This study revealed that SZRD has the characteristics and advantages of "multicomponent, multitarget, and multipathway" in the treatment of PDSD; among these, the combination of the main active components of quercetin and kaempferol with the key targets of AKT1, IL6, MAPK1, TP53, and VEGFA may be one of the important mechanisms. This study provides a theoretical basis for further study of the material basis and molecular mechanism of SZRD in the treatment of PDSD.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34660782 PMCID: PMC8519686 DOI: 10.1155/2021/1752570
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
SZRD shares chemical composition information table.
| Number | Mol ID | Molecule name | OB% | DL | Drug |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | MOL000359 | Sitosterol | 36.91 | 0.75 |
|
| B | MOL000211 | Mairin | 55.38 | 0.78 |
|
| C | MOL000422 | Kaempferol | 41.88 | 0.24 |
|
Chemical information sheet of major active ingredients.
| Number | Mol ID | Molecule name | OB% | DL | Degree |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GC84 | MOL000098 | Quercetin | 46.43 | 0.28 | 127 |
| C | MOL000422 | Kaempferol | 41.88 | 0.24 | 104 |
| GC74 | MOL000500 | Vestitol | 74.66 | 0.21 | 33 |
| GC8 | MOL003896 | 7-Methoxy-2-methyl isoflavone | 42.56 | 0.20 | 30 |
| GC11 | MOL004328 | Naringenin | 58.29 | 0.21 | 29 |
| ZM2 | MOL004373 | Anhydroicaritin | 45.41 | 0.44 | 27 |
| GC9 | MOL000392 | Formononetin | 69.67 | 0.21 | 26 |
| ZM6 | MOL000449 | Stigmasterol | 43.48 | 0.76 | 24 |
| GC5 | MOL002565 | Medicarpin | 49.22 | 0.34 | 24 |
| GC63 | MOL000497 | Licochalcone a | 40.79 | 0.29 | 24 |
| GC41 | MOL004891 | Shinpterocarpin | 80.3 | 0.73 | 23 |
| GC65 | MOL004978 | 2-[(3R)-8,8-Dimethyl-3,4-dihydro-2H-pyrano[6,5-f] chromen-3-yl]-5-methoxyphenol | 36.21 | 0.52 | 23 |
| SZR1 | MOL001522 | (S)-Coclaurine | 42.35 | 0.24 | 22 |
| GC6 | MOL004980 | Isorhamnetin | 39.71 | 0.33 | 22 |
| GC76 | MOL005003 | Licoagrocarpin | 58.81 | 0.58 | 21 |
| GC25 | MOL004835 | Glypallichalcone | 61.60 | 0.19 | 20 |
| GC64 | MOL004974 | 3′-Methoxyglabridin | 46.16 | 0.57 | 20 |
GC: Glycyrrhiza glabra; C: common components of Glycyrrhiza glabra and Rhizoma anemarrhenae; ZM: Rhizoma anemarrhenae; SZR: Semen ziziphi spinosae.
Figure 1Composition-target network of SZRD. Circles are for traditional Chinese medicine; octagons are compound component; diamonds are target. GC: Glycyrrhiza glabra; SZR: Semen ziziphi spinosae; FL: Poria cocos; ZM: Rhizoma anemarrhenae; CX: Rhizoma chuanxiong; A: common components of Glycyrrhiza glabra and Rhizoma chuanxiong; B: common components of Glycyrrhiza glabra and Semen ziziphi spinosae; C: common components of Glycyrrhiza glabra and Rhizoma anemarrhenae.
Figure 2Disease-drug target Venn diagram.
Core target information table.
| Target | Degree | Betweenness centrality (BC) | Closeness centrality (CC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| AKT1 | 123 | 0.064225 | 0.731518 |
| IL6 | 110 | 0.033377 | 0.693727 |
| MAPK3 | 109 | 0.052416 | 0.693727 |
| TP53 | 105 | 0.027917 | 0.676259 |
| VEGFA | 100 | 0.016309 | 0.664311 |
| TNF | 98 | 0.018693 | 0.661972 |
| CASP3 | 97 | 0.019316 | 0.661972 |
| JUN | 97 | 0.021842 | 0.664311 |
| EGF | 95 | 0.020902 | 0.657343 |
| MAPK8 | 95 | 0.017033 | 0.657343 |
| PTGS2 | 91 | 0.032141 | 0.646048 |
| MAPK1 | 90 | 0.012068 | 0.639456 |
| EGFR | 89 | 0.016470 | 0.641638 |
| MYC | 89 | 0.013782 | 0.639456 |
| STAT3 | 88 | 0.011530 | 0.635135 |
| FOS | 87 | 0.033525 | 0.639456 |
| CXCL8 | 85 | 0.016357 | 0.626667 |
| MMP9 | 85 | 0.027723 | 0.632997 |
| IL1B | 82 | 0.013500 | 0.626667 |
| CAT | 81 | 0.038221 | 0.624585 |
| ESR1 | 79 | 0.010994 | 0.616393 |
| CCND1 | 77 | 0.006779 | 0.610390 |
| CCL2 | 76 | 0.005212 | 0.608414 |
| NOS3 | 74 | 0.020902 | 0.614379 |
| MTOR | 71 | 0.006984 | 0.598726 |
| MAPK14 | 71 | 0.005773 | 0.600639 |
| IL10 | 70 | 0.003254 | 0.593060 |
| MMP2 | 69 | 0.003821 | 0.596825 |
| PPARG | 68 | 0.008861 | 0.594937 |
| ICAM1 | 67 | 0.002937 | 0.591195 |
| RELA | 67 | 0.014775 | 0.585670 |
| ERBB2 | 66 | 0.009451 | 0.587500 |
| AR | 64 | 0.017042 | 0.589342 |
| HMOX1 | 63 | 0.006109 | 0.580247 |
| STAT1 | 63 | 0.006329 | 0.574924 |
| SERPINE1 | 62 | 0.004200 | 0.580247 |
| IL4 | 61 | 0.002350 | 0.576687 |
| IL2 | 60 | 0.002819 | 0.569697 |
| VCAM1 | 60 | 0.002099 | 0.574924 |
| BCL2L1 | 59 | 0.002173 | 0.567976 |
| CASP8 | 58 | 0.002424 | 0.564565 |
Figure 3Core target PPI network. As the figure shows, the larger area of the circle could be considered as more important in this network.
Figure 4GO function enrichment results of SZRD in the treatment of PDSD.
KEGG pathway enrichment results.
| Term | % | Count |
| Related genes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| hsa05200: pathways in cancer | 65.8536 | 27 | 2.30 |
|
| hsa04668: TNF signaling pathway | 43.9024 | 18 | 3.19 |
|
| hsa05161: hepatitis B | 43.9024 | 18 | 7.08 |
|
| hsa05142: Chagas disease | 41.4634 | 17 | 1.04 |
|
| hsa05205: proteoglycans in cancer | 41.4634 | 17 | 4.91 |
|
| hsa04151: PI3K-Akt signaling pathway | 39.0243 | 16 | 3.03 |
|
| hsa04010: MAPK signaling pathway | 36.5853 | 15 | 5.72 |
|
| hsa05212: pancreatic cancer | 34.1463 | 14 | 1.31 |
|
| hsa04066: HIF-1 signaling pathway | 34.1463 | 14 | 2.96 |
|
| hsa04620: Toll-like receptor signaling pathway | 34.1463 | 14 | 1.11 |
|
| hsa05164: influenza A | 34.1463 | 14 | 7.36 |
|
| hsa05145: toxoplasmosis | 31.7073 | 13 | 5.84 |
|
| hsa05160: hepatitis C | 31.7073 | 13 | 5.83 |
|
| hsa05152: tuberculosis | 31.7073 | 13 | 1.73 |
|
| hsa04068: FoxO signaling pathway | 29.2682 | 12 | 1.45 |
|
Figure 5KEGG enrichment bubble diagram.
Figure 6H-C-T-P network diagram. Triangle is SZRD; octagons are compound component; diamonds are target; V is pathway.
Docking results of target protein and active compound.
| Core target | PDB ID | Binding energy/(kcal Mol-1) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quercetin | Kaempferol | ||
| AKT1 | 1UNQ | -6.18 | -6.51 |
| IL-6 | 1ALU | -5.72 | -5.90 |
| MAPK3 | 4QTB | -5.45 | -5.33 |
| TP53 | 1YC5 | -5.92 | -6.08 |
| VEGFA | 4QAF | -5.61 | -5.67 |
Figure 7Molecular docking diagram of chemical composition to target: (a) 1UNQ-quercetin; (b) 1UNQ-kaempferol; (c) 1YC5-kaempferol.