| Literature DB >> 34660171 |
Abstract
Adsorption of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) onto H3PO4-activated Cystoseira barbata (Stackhouse) C. Agardh (derived from algal biodiesel industry waste) biochar was investigated via batch experiments and mathematical models. The activated biochar (BC-H) was produced in a single step by using the microwave irradiation method. Thus, it was obtained with a low cost, energy efficiency and by promoting clean production processes. BC-H exhibited a remarkable adsorption efficiency (98.9%) and large surface area (1088.806 m2 g-1) for removal of HCQ. The Langmuir isotherm and the pseudo-second-order kinetic models were the best fit for the equilibrium adsorption and kinetics experiments, and the maximum monolayer adsorption capacity (qmax) was found to be 353.58 µg g-1. Additionally, the experiments with real wastewater showed that BC-H's ability to adsorb HCQ was not affected by competitive ions in the water. The Taguchi orthogonal array (L16 OA) experimental design was applied for the effective cost optimization analyses of the adsorption process by considering four levels and four controllable factors (initial pH, HCQ concentration, amount of adsorbent and contact time). Scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller analyses were used for characterizing the adsorbent. The findings showed that BC-H can be used as an effective and low-cost adsorbent in the removal of HCQ from water. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13369-021-06235-w. © King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals 2021.Entities:
Keywords: Adsorption; Biochar; Cystoseira barbata; Experimental design; Hydroxychloroquine; Microwave
Year: 2021 PMID: 34660171 PMCID: PMC8505786 DOI: 10.1007/s13369-021-06235-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arab J Sci Eng ISSN: 2191-4281 Impact factor: 2.807
Experimental parameters and their levels
| Factors | Symbol | L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial pH | A | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| Dosage (g L−1) | B | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Contact time (min) | C | 30 | 60 | 120 | 180 |
| HCQ concentration (µg L−1) | D | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 |
Fig. 3a Isotherm studies of HCQ, b kinetic studies of HCQ (conditions: 20 and 50 µg L−1 HCQ), c intraparticle diffusion model, d comparison of experimental results in the optimum conditions for HCQ adsorption from synthetic wastewater and treated campus wastewater (DWW)
Fig. 1SEM images of BC-H (x10.000) a before and b after adsorption c FTIR spectra of the BC-H before and after HCQ adsorption
Orthogonal array of L16 for HCQ adsorption
| Experiment no | Factors | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | HCQ removal (%) | S/N ratio | |
| 1 | 6 | 0.05 | 30 | 20 | 18,06 | 25,134 |
| 2 | 6 | 0.1 | 60 | 30 | 33,33 | 30,458 |
| 3 | 6 | 0.2 | 120 | 40 | 63,08 | 35,998 |
| 4 | 6 | 0.4 | 180 | 50 | 89,44 | 39,031 |
| 5 | 7 | 0.05 | 60 | 40 | 32,36 | 30,199 |
| 6 | 7 | 0.1 | 30 | 50 | 34,19 | 30,678 |
| 7 | 7 | 0.2 | 180 | 20 | 97,95 | 39,820 |
| 8 | 7 | 0.4 | 120 | 30 | 97,99 | 39,823 |
| 9 | 8 | 0.05 | 120 | 50 | 27,29 | 28,720 |
| 10 | 8 | 0.1 | 180 | 40 | 48,97 | 33,798 |
| 11 | 8 | 0.2 | 30 | 30 | 32,59 | 30,263 |
| 12 | 8 | 0.4 | 60 | 20 | 91,95 | 39,271 |
| 13 | 9 | 0.05 | 180 | 30 | 36,62 | 31,274 |
| 14 | 9 | 0.1 | 120 | 20 | 60,00 | 35,563 |
| 15 | 9 | 0.2 | 60 | 50 | 54,32 | 34,700 |
| 16 | 9 | 0.4 | 30 | 40 | 75,62 | 37,573 |
The optimum condition for the maximum uptake of HCQ
| Factors | Optimum level |
|---|---|
| Initial pH | 7 |
| Dosage (g L−1) | 0.4 |
| Contact time (min) | 180 |
| HCQ concentration (µg L-1) | 20 |
Fig. 2Plot of the effect of factor levels on S/N ratio
ANOVA results for uptake of HCQ using BC-H
| Source | DF | SeqSS | AdjMS | % Contrib. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial pH | 3 | 18.481 | 6.1603 | 8.73 | 0.054 | 6.075 |
| Dosage (g L−1) | 3 | 216.963 | 72.3121 | 102.51 | 0.002 | 71.314 |
| Contact time (min) | 3 | 58.337 | 19.4457 | 27.57 | 0.011 | 19.175 |
| Co (µg L−1) | 3 | 10.454 | 3.4848 | 4.94 | 0.111 | 3.436 |
df degree of freedom; SS sum of squares; MS mean squares; Contrib. contribution ratio
Kinetic parameters
| Kinetic parameters | HCQ 20 | HCQ 50 |
|---|---|---|
| qe (experimental) (µg g−1) | 49.44 | 124.02 |
| qe (µg g−1) | 43.75 | 110.54 |
| 0.6394 | 0.1776 | |
| 0.5189 | 0.8471 | |
| RMSE | 5.26 | 12.38 |
| qe (µg g−1) | 47.10 | 122.32 |
| 0.0192 | 0.00206 | |
| 0.8270 | 0.9291 | |
| RMSE | ||
| 1.6197 | 6.3933 | |
| Ci (µg g−1) | 32.9296 | 56.3226 |
| 0.7258 | 0.8131 | |
| RMSE | 3.77 | 11.61 |
Isotherm model parameters
| Model parameters | |
|---|---|
| 164.01 | |
| 1/ | 0.783 |
| RMSE | 8.023 |
| 0.9488 | |
| qm (µg g−1) | 353.58 |
| 0.7600 | |
| (0.33–0.71) | |
| RMSE | 6.686 |
| 0.9676 | |