Literature DB >> 34658587

Bilateral Orchidectomy Revisited in Management of Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

Ankur Agarwala1, Somendra Bansal2, Narmada P Gupta3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a well-established treatment for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). It includes either bilateral orchiectomy or medical castration in form of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist or antagonist. We conducted this study to compare surgical and medical castration in terms of time to progression (TTP) to castration resistant prostate cancer.
METHODS: Patients with mHSPC underwent either bilateral orchidectomy or medical castration by either LHRH agonist or by antagonist from November 2016 to May 2018 in our institution. Initial PSA and baseline imaging either magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET CT) finding were recorded. Serum PSA, testosterone, and FSH were repeated every 3 months till 1 year. All enrolled patients were followed up with a bone scan/MRI/ PET CT at 6 months and 12 months. End point of study was progression of disease and death of patient.
RESULTS: Mean nadir PSA (ng/ml) after treatment was 4.7 and 9.8 in surgical and medical group respectively, whereas mean time to the nadir PSA was 8.7 and 8.8 respectively with no statistically significant difference. Mean TTP was 13.9 months in bilateral orchidectomy group and 13.8 months in medical castration group (chi-square 0.003, p value 0.958).
CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in time to progression between bilateral orchidectomy and medical castration. Considering nadir PSA level, better quality of life, patient compliance, reduced hospital visit, and decrease in cost of treatment, bilateral orchidectomy may be a better treatment option especially in developing countries. © Indian Association of Surgical Oncology 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bilateral orchidectomy; Hormone sensitive; Medical castration; Metastatic; Prostate cancer

Year:  2021        PMID: 34658587      PMCID: PMC8490498          DOI: 10.1007/s13193-021-01390-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0975-7651


  14 in total

1.  Chemohormonal therapy in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Sweeney CJ, Chen YH, Carducci M, Liu G, Jarrard DF, Eisenberger M, Wong YN, Hahn N, Kohli M, Cooney MM, Dreicer R, Vogelzang NJ, Picus J, Shevrin D, Hussain M, Garcia JA, DiPaola RS. Department of Medicine; Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center; School of Medicine and Public Health; Madison; Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Center; Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute; Both in Cleveland; University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, Las Vegas; Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor; Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick.N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 20;373(8):737-46. [Epub 2015 Aug 5]. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503747.

Authors:  Eggener Scott
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.498

2.  Single-therapy androgen suppression in men with advanced prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Seidenfeld; D J Samson; V Hasselblad; N Aronson; P C Albertsen; C L Bennett; T J Wilt
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-04-04       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  Cost considerations for systemic therapy for patients with advanced genitourinary malignancies.

Authors:  Mark A Henry; Andrew Leung; Christopher P Filson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Comparison of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonists and Orchiectomy: Effects of Androgen-Deprivation Therapy.

Authors:  Maxine Sun; Toni K Choueiri; Ole-Petter R Hamnvik; Mark A Preston; Guillermo De Velasco; Wei Jiang; Stacy Loeb; Paul L Nguyen; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 31.777

5.  Cancer statistics, 2014.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Jiemin Ma; Zhaohui Zou; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 6.  Gonadotropin-releasing hormone: an update review of the antagonists versus agonists.

Authors:  Hein Van Poppel; Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.369

7.  A comparison of androgen deprivation therapy versus surgical castration for patients with advanced prostatic carcinoma.

Authors:  Yu-hsiang Lin; Chien-lun Chen; Chen-pang Hou; Phei-lang Chang; Ke-hung Tsui
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  Degarelix monotherapy compared with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists plus anti-androgen flare protection in advanced prostate cancer: an analysis of two randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Peter Iversen; Jan-Erik Damber; Anders Malmberg; Bo-Eric Persson; Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2015-12-16

9.  Redefining clinically significant castration levels in patients with prostate cancer receiving continuous androgen deprivation therapy.

Authors:  Juan Morote; Anna Orsola; Jacques Planas; Enrique Trilla; Carles X Raventós; Lluís Cecchini; Roberto Catalán
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  The burden of prostate cancer in Asian nations.

Authors:  Jennifer Cullen; Sally Elsamanoudi; Stephen A Brassell; Yongmei Chen; Monica Colombo; Amita Srivastava; David G McLeod
Journal:  J Carcinog       Date:  2012-03-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.