| Literature DB >> 34657895 |
Sampsa Puttonen1, Kati Karhula1, Annina Ropponen1,2, Tarja Hakola1, Mikael Sallinen1, Mikko Härmä1.
Abstract
Employees often prefer 12-hour work shifts but they can increase sleepiness and injury risk. We assessed whether sleep, sleepiness, satisfaction and need for recovery changed after changing from an 8-hour to a 12-hour shift system. The participants were 178 employees of the paper, pulp and chemical industries. Using a quasi-experimental controlled intervention design, 83 employees, who changed from an 8-hour shift schedule to a 12-hour shift schedule were compared to those who remained in the 8-hour shift schedule (n=95). Participants filled in a survey on sleep, sleepiness, satisfaction and need for recovery at baseline and 9-12 months after the shift schedule change. We used generalized estimation equation models adjusted for age, sex, shift work experience in years and baseline shift system. Sleep length was longer in the 12-hour shift schedule before the first morning shift and between morning shifts. Sleepiness during morning shifts was less frequent and satisfaction with the shift system was more prevalent in the 12-hour shift schedule. Also, perceived negative associations of the current shift system with work-life balance were less common in the 12-hour shift schedule. The differences found between the shift systems were minor and the results did not indicate significant disadvantages of the 12-hour fast forward-rotating shift system.Entities:
Keywords: Controlled study; Extended work shift; Shift scheduling; Shift work; Sleep; Sleepiness; Work-life balance
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34657895 PMCID: PMC8980689 DOI: 10.2486/indhealth.2021-0052
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ind Health ISSN: 0019-8366 Impact factor: 2.179