Literature DB >> 34656987

Biosimilar SB11 versus reference ranibizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: 1-year phase III randomised clinical trial outcomes.

Neil M Bressler1, Miroslav Veith2,3, Jan Hamouz3,4, Jan Ernest5, Dominik Zalewski6, Jan Studnička7,8, Attila Vajas9, András Papp10, Gabor Vogt11, James Luu12, Veronika Matuskova13,14, Young Hee Yoon15,16, Tamás Pregun17, Taehyung Kim18, Donghoon Shin18, Inkyung Oh18, Hansol Jeong18, Mercy Yeeun Kim18, Se Joon Woo19,20.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To provide longer-term data on efficacy, safety, immunogenicity and pharmacokinetics (PK) of ranibizumab biosimilar SB11 compared with the reference ranibizumab (RBZ) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).
METHODS: Setting: Multicentre. Design: Randomised, double-masked, parallel-group, phase III equivalence study. Patient population: ≥50 years old participants with nAMD (n=705), one 'study eye'. INTERVENTION: 1:1 randomisation to monthly intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg SB11 or RBZ. Main outcome measures: Visual efficacy endpoints, safety, immunogenicity and PK up to 52 weeks.
RESULTS: Baseline and disease characteristics were comparable between treatment groups. Of 705 randomised participants (SB11: n=351; RBZ: n=354), 634 participants (89.9%; SB11: n=307; RBZ: n=327) completed the study until week 52. Previously reported equivalence in primary efficacy remained stable up to week 52 and were comparable between SB11 and RBZ. The adjusted treatment difference between SB11 and RBZ in full analysis set at week 52 of change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity was -0.6 letters (90% CI -2.1 to 0.9) and of change from baseline in central subfield thickness was -14.9 µm (95% CI -25.3 to -4.5). The incidence of ocular treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (SB11: 32.0% vs RBZ: 29.7%) and serious ocular TEAE (SB11: 2.9% vs RBZ: 2.3%) appeared comparable between treatment groups, and no new safety concerns were observed. The PK and immunogenicity profiles were comparable, with a 4.2% and 5.5% cumulative incidence of antidrug antibodies up to week 52 for SB11 and RBZ, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Longer-term results of this study further support the biosimilarity established between SB11 and RBZ. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  degeneration; macula; neovascularisation; retina

Year:  2021        PMID: 34656987     DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-319637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   5.908


  3 in total

1.  Fear of safety compromise with biosimilar anti-VEGF-perception or truth.

Authors:  Ashish Sharma; Nikulaa Parachuri; Nilesh Kumar; Francesco Bandello; Baruch D Kuppermann
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 4.456

Review 2.  Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (nAMD): A Review of Emerging Treatment Options.

Authors:  Colin S Tan; Wei Kiong Ngo; Isaac W Chay; Dominic S Ting; SriniVas R Sadda
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-25

Review 3.  An Introduction to Biosimilars for the Treatment of Retinal Diseases: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Seenu M Hariprasad; Richard P Gale; Christina Y Weng; Hans C Ebbers; Mourad F Rezk; Ramin Tadayoni
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2022-03-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.