Literature DB >> 34656734

Follow-up of asymptomatic positive COVID-19 patients after delivery.

Jennifer Hill1, Todd Rosen2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34656734      PMCID: PMC8516122          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM        ISSN: 2589-9333


× No keyword cloud information.
Thank you for your comments regarding our article titled “Obstetrical outcomes and follow-up for patients with asymptomatic COVID-19 at delivery: a multicenter prospective cohort study.” The author brings up several issues that we wish to address. First, the positive predictive value of a test depends on the prevalence of the disease in the population that is being tested. COVID-19 is an infectious disease and thus minimizing the false negatives is the important test characteristic, in addition to the sensitivity and specificity. Our study used the Cepheid Xpert Xpress rapid COVID-19 test, which has a 99.4% sensitivity, 96.8% specificity, 77% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value in our patients. In a larger study in which 27,421 asymptomatic individuals were tested and 49,542 tests were used, there was a positive predictive value of 86.7%. Our positive predictive value was slightly lower, but this may be because of the declining prevalence of the disease during the course of our study. Second, the questions raised regarding the diagnosis of a true infection bring up a question that we had considered when designing our study. Initially, our plan was to obtain viral load data and compare it with the severity of symptoms that our patients experienced. The testing platform that we used, Cepheid Xpert Xpress, had this capability. However, when we analyzed our data and found that most of the patients who tested positive were asymptomatic, we determined that the addition of viral load data would not strengthen our results. Although we understand that an accurate laboratory diagnosis is necessary, we were focusing on the follow-up of these patients. We acknowledge the limitations of our study and we appreciate the questions that were asked. Despite the positive predictive value of our test being 77% with the possibility of erroneous diagnoses, we found that most of our patients were asymptomatic positive and did not go on to develop clinically significant infections.
  2 in total

1.  Multicenter Evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 Test.

Authors:  Michael J Loeffelholz; David Alland; Susan M Butler-Wu; Utsav Pandey; Carlo Frederico Perno; Alice Nava; Karen C Carroll; Heba Mostafa; Emma Davies; Ashley McEwan; Jennifer L Rakeman; Randal C Fowler; Jean-Michel Pawlotsky; Slim Fourati; Sukalyani Banik; Padmapriya P Banada; Shobha Swaminathan; Soumitesh Chakravorty; Robert W Kwiatkowski; Victor C Chu; JoAnn Kop; Rajiv Gaur; Mandy L Y Sin; Duy Nguyen; Simranjit Singh; Na Zhang; David H Persing
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  The potential of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detection tests in the screening of asymptomatic persons.

Authors:  Jonas Wachinger; Ioana Diana Olaru; Susanne Horner; Paul Schnitzler; Klaus Heeg; Claudia M Denkinger
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 8.067

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.