Literature DB >> 34656465

Using Deep-Learning Algorithms to Simultaneously Identify Right and Left Ventricular Dysfunction From the Electrocardiogram.

Akhil Vaid1, Kipp W Johnson2, Marcus A Badgeley3, Sulaiman S Somani4, Mesude Bicak5, Isotta Landi6, Adam Russak7, Shan Zhao8, Matthew A Levin9, Robert S Freeman10, Alexander W Charney11, Atul Kukar12, Bette Kim13, Tatyana Danilov14, Stamatios Lerakis15, Edgar Argulian16, Jagat Narula17, Girish N Nadkarni18, Benjamin S Glicksberg19.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to develop DL models capable of comprehensively quantifying left and right ventricular dysfunction from ECG data in a large, diverse population.
BACKGROUND: Rapid evaluation of left and right ventricular function using deep learning (DL) on electrocardiograms (ECGs) can assist diagnostic workflow. However, DL tools to estimate right ventricular (RV) function do not exist, whereas those to estimate left ventricular (LV) function are restricted to quantification of very low LV function only.
METHODS: A multicenter study was conducted with data from 5 New York City hospitals: 4 for internal testing and 1 serving as external validation. We created novel DL models to classify left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) into categories derived from the latest universal definition of heart failure, estimate LVEF through regression, and predict a composite outcome of either RV systolic dysfunction or RV dilation.
RESULTS: We obtained echocardiogram LVEF estimates for 147,636 patients paired to 715,890 ECGs. We used natural language processing (NLP) to extract RV size and systolic function information from 404,502 echocardiogram reports paired to 761,510 ECGs for 148,227 patients. For LVEF classification in internal testing, area under curve (AUC) at detection of LVEF ≤40%, 40% < LVEF ≤50%, and LVEF >50% was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.94-0.94), 0.82 (95% CI: 0.81-0.83), and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.89-0.89), respectively. For external validation, these results were 0.94 (95% CI: 0.94-0.95), 0.73 (95% CI: 0.72-0.74), and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.87-0.88). For regression, the mean absolute error was 5.84% (95% CI: 5.82%-5.85%) for internal testing and 6.14% (95% CI: 6.13%-6.16%) in external validation. For prediction of the composite RV outcome, AUC was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.84-0.84) in both internal testing and external validation.
CONCLUSIONS: DL on ECG data can be used to create inexpensive screening, diagnostic, and predictive tools for both LV and RV dysfunction. Such tools may bridge the applicability of ECGs and echocardiography and enable prioritization of patients for further interventions for either sided failure progressing to biventricular disease.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artificial intelligence; echocardiography; electrocardiogram; left heart failure; left ventricular ejection fraction; right heart failure

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34656465      PMCID: PMC8917975          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  48 in total

1.  Right ventricular ejection fraction <20% is an independent predictor of mortality but not of hospitalization in older systolic heart failure patients.

Authors:  Philippe Meyer; Ravi V Desai; Marjan Mujib; Margaret A Feller; Chris Adamopoulos; Maciej Banach; Mitja Lainscak; Inmaculada Aban; Michel White; Wilbert S Aronow; Prakash Deedwania; Ami E Iskandrian; Ali Ahmed
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 4.164

2.  Prognostic value of right ventricular ejection fraction in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Pierre-Yves Courand; Géraldine Pina Jomir; Chahéra Khouatra; Christian Scheiber; Ségolène Turquier; Jean-Charles Glérant; Bénédicte Mastroianni; Béatrice Gentil; Anne-Sophie Blanchet-Legens; Alfred Dib; Geneviève Derumeaux; Marc Humbert; Jean-François Mornex; Jean-François Cordier; Vincent Cottin
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 16.671

3.  Right ventricular dysfunction assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging predicts poor prognosis late after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Eric Larose; Peter Ganz; H Glenn Reynolds; Sharmila Dorbala; Marcelo F Di Carli; Kenneth A Brown; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Prognostic relevance of the echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular function in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Stefano Ghio; Catherine Klersy; Giulia Magrini; Andrea Maria D'Armini; Laura Scelsi; Claudia Raineri; Michele Pasotti; Alessandra Serio; Carlo Campana; Mario Viganò
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 4.164

5.  Right Ventricular Function, Right Ventricular-Pulmonary Artery Coupling, and Heart Failure Risk in 4 US Communities: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study.

Authors:  Kotaro Nochioka; Gabriela Querejeta Roca; Brian Claggett; Tor Biering-Sørensen; Kunihiro Matsushita; Chung-Lieh Hung; Scott D Solomon; Dalane Kitzman; Amil M Shah
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 14.676

6.  Machine Learning of 12-Lead QRS Waveforms to Identify Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Patients With Differential Outcomes.

Authors:  Albert K Feeny; John Rickard; Kevin M Trulock; Divyang Patel; Saleem Toro; Laurie Ann Moennich; Niraj Varma; Mark J Niebauer; Eiran Z Gorodeski; Richard A Grimm; John Barnard; Anant Madabhushi; Mina K Chung
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-06-14

7.  U.S. Hospital Use of Echocardiography: Insights From the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Alexander Papolos; Jagat Narula; Chirag Bavishi; Farooq A Chaudhry; Partho P Sengupta
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Universal Definition and Classification of Heart Failure: A Report of the Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, Japanese Heart Failure Society and Writing Committee of the Universal Definition of Heart Failure.

Authors:  Biykem Bozkurt; Andrew Js Coats; Hiroyuki Tsutsui; Magdy Abdelhamid; Stamatis Adamopoulos; Nancy Albert; Stefan D Anker; John Atherton; Michael Böhm; Javed Butler; Mark H Drazner; G Michael Felker; Gerasimos Filippatos; Gregg C Fonarow; Mona Fiuzat; Juan-Esteban Gomez-Mesa; Paul Heidenreich; Teruhiko Imamura; James Januzzi; Ewa A Jankowska; Prateeti Khazanie; Koichiro Kinugawa; Carolyn S P Lam; Yuya Matsue; Marco Metra; Tomohito Ohtani; Massimo Francesco Piepoli; Piotr Ponikowski; Giuseppe M C Rosano; Yasushi Sakata; Petar SeferoviĆ; Randall C Starling; John R Teerlink; Orly Vardeny; Kazuhiro Yamamoto; Clyde Yancy; Jian Zhang; Shelley Zieroth
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 5.712

9.  Scoring System Based on Electrocardiogram Features to Predict the Type of Heart Failure in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure.

Authors:  Purnasidha Bagaswoto Hendry; Lucia Krisdinarti; Maharani Erika
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2016-06-24

10.  ImaGene: a convolutional neural network to quantify natural selection from genomic data.

Authors:  Luis Torada; Lucrezia Lorenzon; Alice Beddis; Ulas Isildak; Linda Pattini; Sara Mathieson; Matteo Fumagalli
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  5 in total

1.  Automated Determination of Left Ventricular Function Using Electrocardiogram Data in Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Akhil Vaid; Joy J Jiang; Ashwin Sawant; Karandeep Singh; Patricia Kovatch; Alexander W Charney; David M Charytan; Jasmin Divers; Benjamin S Glicksberg; Lili Chan; Girish N Nadkarni
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 10.614

2.  Development of a machine learning model using electrocardiogram signals to improve acute pulmonary embolism screening.

Authors:  Sulaiman S Somani; Hossein Honarvar; Sukrit Narula; Isotta Landi; Shawn Lee; Yeraz Khachatoorian; Arsalan Rehmani; Andrew Kim; Jessica K De Freitas; Shelly Teng; Suraj Jaladanki; Arvind Kumar; Adam Russak; Shan P Zhao; Robert Freeman; Matthew A Levin; Girish N Nadkarni; Alexander C Kagen; Edgar Argulian; Benjamin S Glicksberg
Journal:  Eur Heart J Digit Health       Date:  2021-11-25

3.  Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiogram Predicted Left Ventricle Diameter as an Independent Risk Factor of Long-Term Cardiovascular Outcome in Patients With Normal Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Hung-Yi Chen; Chin-Sheng Lin; Wen-Hui Fang; Chia-Cheng Lee; Ching-Liang Ho; Chih-Hung Wang; Chin Lin
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-11

Review 4.  State-of-the-Art Deep Learning Methods on Electrocardiogram Data: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Georgios Petmezas; Leandros Stefanopoulos; Vassilis Kilintzis; Andreas Tzavelis; John A Rogers; Aggelos K Katsaggelos; Nicos Maglaveras
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2022-08-15

5.  Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiography Predicts Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Future Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Hung-Yi Chen; Chin-Sheng Lin; Wen-Hui Fang; Yu-Sheng Lou; Cheng-Chung Cheng; Chia-Cheng Lee; Chin Lin
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-03-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.