| Literature DB >> 34655705 |
Karoline Aagaard Lentz1, Jakob Plum2, Bente Steffansen3, Per-Ola Arvidsson3, Diana Højmark Omkvist3, Anders Just Pedersen3, Carl Johan Sennbro3, Gitte Pommergaard Pedersen3, Jette Jacobsen4.
Abstract
Amorphous solid dispersion (ASD) is emerging as a useful formulation strategy to increase the bioavailability of active pharmaceutical ingredients with poor solubility. In vitro dissolution testing under non-sink conditions has often been used to evaluate the ability of ASDs to generate and maintain supersaturation to predict the in vivo performance. However, such a single compartment dissolution setup can fail to predict the oral bioavailability, due to an interdependence between precipitation and permeation. Hence, the use of two compartment dissolution-permeation setups is emerging. In this study, three ASDs containing fenofibrate as model drug substance were developed using Soluplus®, and Hypromellose Acetate Succinate in two different grades (high and low), respectively. The aim was to compare the use of a small-scale in vitro non-sink dissolution setup and a small-scale in vitro dissolution-permeation setup to predict the in vivo oral exposure of the ASDs in rats. The maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under curve (AUC) obtained in the in vitro studies were used to predict the in vivo rank order of the formulations. The results showed that the two in vitro studies resulted in the same rank order based on both Cmax and AUC. Interestingly, Cmax resulted in a better in vitro/in vivo correlation than the in vitro AUC, and based on the in vitro Cmax, the in vivo rank order was predicted.Entities:
Keywords: Amorphous solid dispersion; Dissolution/permeation; Fenofibrate; Formulation development; Oral rat pharmacokinetics; Predictive dissolution
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34655705 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.121174
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Pharm ISSN: 0378-5173 Impact factor: 5.875