Literature DB >> 34655054

"What Really Matters When Performing a Laparoscopic Roux-en Y Gastric Bypass?" Literature-Based Key Steps Towards Success and Standardization of the Procedure.

Jean-Philippe M M K Magema1, Jacques Himpens2.   

Abstract

Lack of standardization in the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RY-GBP) is quite well established. We all learned the basics of the technique, but a lot of differences do exist in performing each step of the procedure. Based on scientific evidences, coming from an extensive and meticulous review of the literature of the last 20 years, we thus address the different technical steps of the procedure and their importance to try and propose a standardization of RYGBP. A lot of possibilities exist at each and every step of a RYGBP. They influence the postoperative complications, the end weight loss (EWL), weight regain, and resolution of obesity bounded comorbidities. Furthermore, lack of standardization leads to problems regarding comparison of scientific data in the related literature.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastric bypass; Key steps; Limb length; Standardization

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34655054     DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05750-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  12 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of medium-term outcomes after banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  H Buchwald; J N Buchwald; T W McGlennon
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Small-Volume, Fast-Emptying Gastric Pouch Leads to Better Long-Term Weight Loss and Food Tolerance After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

Authors:  Daniel Riccioppo; Marco Aurelio Santo; Manoel Rocha; Carlos Alberto Buchpiguel; Marcio Augusto Diniz; Denis Pajecki; Roberto de Cleva; Flavio Kawamoto
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 3.  Choosing an operation for weight control, and the transected banded gastric bypass.

Authors:  Mathias A L Fobi; Hoil Lee; Basil Felahy; Kekah Che; Peter Ako; Nicole Fobi
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  The Role of Gastrojejunostomy Size on Gastric Bypass Weight Loss.

Authors:  Almino Cardoso Ramos; João Caetano Marchesini; Eduardo Lemos de Souza Bastos; Manoela Galvão Ramos; Maíra Danielle Gomes de Souza; Josemberg Marins Campos; Alvaro Bandeira Ferraz
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Importance of pouch size in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a cohort study of 14,168 patients.

Authors:  David Edholm; Johan Ottosson; Magnus Sundbom
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Three-year follow-up study of retrocolic versus antecolic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Markus K Müller; Josef Guber; Stefan Wildi; Ivo Guber; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Markus Weber
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Trends in internal hernia incidence after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Ahmed R Ahmed; Gretchen Rickards; Syed Husain; Joseph Johnson; Thad Boss; William O'Malley
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 8.  Clinical Benefit of Gastric Staple Line Reinforcement (SLR) in Gastrointestinal Surgery: a Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Scott A Shikora; Christine B Mahoney
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Banded Gastric Bypass: Better Long-Term Results? A Cohort Study with Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Luc Lemmens
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  A Longer Biliopancreatic Limb in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Improves Weight Loss in the First Years After Surgery: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jens Homan; Abel Boerboom; Edo Aarts; Kemal Dogan; Cees van Laarhoven; Ignace Janssen; Frits Berends
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.