| Literature DB >> 34654932 |
Sarah I Mossad1, Julia M Young1, Simeon M Wong2,3, Benjamin T Dunkley2,4,5, Benjamin A E Hunt6, Elizabeth W Pang2,7, Margot J Taylor2,8,4.
Abstract
Very preterm (VPT: ≤32 weeks of gestational age) birth poses an increased risk for social and cognitive morbidities that persist throughout life. Resting-state functional network connectivity studies provide information about the intrinsic capacity for cognitive processing. We studied the following four social-cognitive resting-state networks: the default mode, salience, frontal-parietal and language networks. We examined functional connectivity using magnetoencephalography with individual head localization using each participant's MRI at 6 (n = 40) and 8 (n = 40) years of age compared to age- and sex-matched full-term (FT) born children (n = 38 at 6 years and n = 43 at 8 years). VPT children showed increased connectivity compared to FT children in the gamma band (30-80 Hz) at 6 years within the default mode network (DMN), and between the DMN and the salience, frontal-parietal and language networks, pointing to more diffuse, less segregated processing across networks at this age. At 8 years, VPT children had more social and academic difficulties. Increased DMN connectivity at 6 years was associated with social and working memory difficulties at 8 years. Therefore, we suggest that increased DMN connectivity contributes to the observed emerging social and cognitive morbidities in school age.Entities:
Keywords: functional connectivity; intrinsic networks; magnetoencephalography (MEG); preterm birth; resting-state connectivity
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34654932 PMCID: PMC8972272 DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsab110
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci ISSN: 1749-5016 Impact factor: 3.436
Characteristics of VPT and FT children
| 6 years old | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VPT ( | FT ( |
|
| |
| Sex (M:F) | 25:15 | 16:22 | χ2(1) = 2.4 | 0.11 |
| Age (years) | 6.6 ± 0.3 | 6.5 ± 0.5 |
| 0.24 |
| Birth weight (g) | 1200 ± 240 | 3500 ± 590 |
| <0.001 |
| GA (weeks) | 29 ± 1.6 | 39 ± 1.6 |
| <0.001 |
| Mother’s education | Grade school ( | Some post-secondary ( | χ2(4) = 4 | 0.3 |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| |
| Sex (M:F) | 24:16 | 22:21 | χ2(1) = 0.5 | 0.47 |
| Age (years) | 8.7 ± 0.5 | 8.6 ± 0.5 |
| 0.27 |
| Birth weight (g) | 1200 ± 220 | 3500 ± 600 |
| <0.001 |
| GA (weeks) | 29 ± 1.41 | 39 ± 1.35 |
| <0.001 |
| Mother’s education | Grade school ( | High school ( | χ2(5) = 6.7 | 0.53 |
Neuropsychological outcome of VPT and FT children at 6 and 8 years
| 6 years | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VPT ( | FT ( |
|
|
| |
| 1. Intelligence | |||||
| Full scale 2-subtest IQ (WASI) | 103.5 ± 13.4 | 110.0 ± 13.0 |
| 0.03* | |
| 2. Social–cognition | |||||
| Affect recognition (NEPSY-II) | 9.4 ± 2.9 | 10.8 ± 3.9 |
| 0.23 | 0.4 |
| Social responsiveness total score (SRS-2) | 53.9 ± 30.6 | 48.5 ± 26.4 |
| 0.41 | 0.4 |
| 3. Executive functioning | |||||
| Global Executive Composite Score (BRIEF) | 48.6 ± 8.9 | 50.3 ± 8.5 |
| 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Digit Recall (WMTB-C) | 105.85 ± 19 | 112.9 ± 13.9 |
| 0.07 | 0.14 |
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 1. Intelligence | |||||
| Full scale 2-subtest IQ (WASI) | 105.6 ± 14.5 | 119.7 ± 11 |
| <0.001* | |
| 2. Social–cognition | |||||
| Affect recognition (NEPSY-II) | 12.2 ± 10.7 | 11.1 ± 2.3 |
| 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Social responsiveness scale total score (SRS-2) | 57.2 ± 27.9 | 43.1 ± 30.2 |
| 0.02* | 0.04* |
| Total difficulties (SDQ) | 57.16 | 43.11 |
| 0.03* | 0.04* |
| 3. Executive functioning | |||||
| Global Executive Composite Score (BRIEF) | 48.4 ± 9.4 | 46.9 ± 8.4 |
| 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Backward Digit Recall (WMTB-C) | 91.8 ± 19.8 | 98.3 ± 15.8 |
| 0.106 | 0.2 |
| Block Recall (WMTB-C) | 90.4 ± 20 | 99.76 |
| 0.016* | 0.01* |
| Digit Recall (WMTB-C) | 102.2 ± 17 | 104.7 ± 16.5 |
| 0.5 | 0.8 |
| 4. Language | |||||
| Word reading (WIAT-III) | 100.6 ± 17 | 107.9 ± 15 |
| 0.04* | 0.04* |
| Pseudoword decoding (WIAT-III) | 95.3 ± 18.3 | 104.4 ± 12.9 |
| 0.01* | 0.02* |
*Asterisks represent a significant difference at P < 0.05.
Fig. 1.Mean global connectivity measured by mean amplitude envelope correlations of all nodes in the networks of interest (Y-axis) in gamma band across the different groups at each timepoint (X-axis). The figure shows group differences at the 6-year timepoint and increased connectivity over the 2-year time period between 6 and 8 years only in the FT group. Coloured bars represent the spread of data points, with the mean represented as a circle between the standard error bars. Circles outside the coloured bars are outliers. Asterisks represent a significant difference at P < 0.05.
Fig. 2.(A, B) Within-group amplitude envelope correlation (AEC) of intra (diagonal) and inter (off-diagonal) network connectivity at 4–7, 30–55 and 65–80 Hz for the VPT (column A) and FT (column B) cohorts. C) Between-group differences in network connectivity in the VPT compared to the FT group. We found significantly stronger AECs in VPT compared to FT children. Differences in column C are reported at P < 0.05 and ** indicates PFWE <0.05 (corrected for multiple comparisons).