Kayla M Fewster1, Jeff M Barrett1, Jack P Callaghan2. 1. Department of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada. 2. Department of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada. Electronic address: jack.callaghan@uwaterloo.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Historically, there has been a lack of focus on the lumbar spine during rear impacts because of the perception that the automotive seat back should protect the lumbar spine from injury. As a result, there have been no studies involving human volunteers to address the risk of low back injury in low velocity rear impact collisions. METHODS: A custom-built crash sled was used to simulate rear impact collisions. Randomized collisions were completed with and without lumbar support. Measures of passive stiffness were obtained prior to impact (Pre), immediately post impact (Post) and 24 h post impact (Post-24). Low back pain reporting was monitored for 24 h following impact exposure. FINDINGS: None of the participants developed clinically significant levels of low back pain after impact. Changes in the passive responses persisted after impact for the length of the low stiffness flexion and extension zone. The length of the low stiffness zone was longer in the Post and Post-24 trial for low stiffness flexion and longer in the Post-24 for low stiffness extension. INTERPRETATION: Findings from this investigation demonstrate that during a laboratory-simulation of an 8 km/h rear-impact collision, young healthy adults did not develop low back pain. Changes in the low stiffness zone of the passive flexion/extension curves were observed following impact and persisted for 24 h. Changes in passive stiffness may lead to changes in the loads and load distributions during movement within the passive structures such as the ligaments and intervertebral discs following impacts.
BACKGROUND: Historically, there has been a lack of focus on the lumbar spine during rear impacts because of the perception that the automotive seat back should protect the lumbar spine from injury. As a result, there have been no studies involving human volunteers to address the risk of low back injury in low velocity rear impact collisions. METHODS: A custom-built crash sled was used to simulate rear impact collisions. Randomized collisions were completed with and without lumbar support. Measures of passive stiffness were obtained prior to impact (Pre), immediately post impact (Post) and 24 h post impact (Post-24). Low back pain reporting was monitored for 24 h following impact exposure. FINDINGS: None of the participants developed clinically significant levels of low back pain after impact. Changes in the passive responses persisted after impact for the length of the low stiffness flexion and extension zone. The length of the low stiffness zone was longer in the Post and Post-24 trial for low stiffness flexion and longer in the Post-24 for low stiffness extension. INTERPRETATION: Findings from this investigation demonstrate that during a laboratory-simulation of an 8 km/h rear-impact collision, young healthy adults did not develop low back pain. Changes in the low stiffness zone of the passive flexion/extension curves were observed following impact and persisted for 24 h. Changes in passive stiffness may lead to changes in the loads and load distributions during movement within the passive structures such as the ligaments and intervertebral discs following impacts.