Literature DB >> 34652554

Graft choice or drilling technique does not influence outcomes of ACL reconstruction in patients over forty-five.

Nihar S Shah1, Blake M Bacevich2, Rachel M Boxer2, Ramsey S Sabbagh2, Kimberly A Hasselfeld2, Christopher J Utz2, Barton R Branam2, Angelo J Colosimo2, Brian M Grawe2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether graft-type and tunnel location in ACL reconstruction impact patient-reported outcomes in individuals over the age of 45.
METHODS: From 2015 to 2018, patients over 45 years old undergoing primary ACL reconstruction without multi-ligamentous injuries were enrolled in an institutional registry. Baseline International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective scores, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS), Marx Activity Scale, and patient characteristics were collected. Follow-up occurred at a minimum of two years to obtain patient-reported outcomes.
RESULTS: Of the 51 patients who qualified for the study, 44 (86.3%) patients were available at a minimum of two years after surgery date (range 24-60 months). Average age at time of surgery of the available patients was 51.6 ± 4.87 (range 45-66). Between femoral tunnel drilling methods, there were no differences in the proportion of patients achieving clinically significant improvement or post-operative outcome scores. While patients who received patellar tendon autografts were more likely to achieve clinically significant improvement in the KOOS sports subscale, there were no other differences in outcomes measures between graft types. Two patients had a retear of their graft, and an additional five patients complained of subjective instability.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients over the age of 45, neither the method used to create the femoral tunnel nor the graft type used in ACL reconstruction caused a significant difference in post-operative PROMs with a minimum of two years of follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV, Case Series.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL reconstruction; Middle-aged patient population; Patient-reported outcome measures; Tunnel drilling method

Year:  2021        PMID: 34652554     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-021-03139-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  3 in total

1.  Rationale for Strategic Graft Placement in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: I.D.E.A.L. Femoral Tunnel Position.

Authors:  Andrew D Pearle; David McAllister; Stephen M Howell
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2015-06

Review 2.  Ageing populations: the challenges ahead.

Authors:  Kaare Christensen; Gabriele Doblhammer; Roland Rau; James W Vaupel
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-10-03       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Sport and ageing: a systematic review of the determinants and trends of participation in sport for older adults.

Authors:  Claire R Jenkin; Rochelle M Eime; Hans Westerbeek; Grant O'Sullivan; Jannique G Z van Uffelen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.295

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.