OBJECTIVES: Three-dimensional (3D) H-scan is a new ultrasound (US) technique that images the relative size of acoustic scatterers. The goal of this research was to evaluate use of 3D H-scan US imaging for monitoring early breast cancer response to neoadjuvant therapy using a preclinical murine model of breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preclinical studies were conducted using luciferase-positive breast cancer-bearing mice (n = 40). Anesthetized animals underwent US imaging at baseline before administration with an apoptosis-inducing drug or a saline control. Image data were acquired using a US scanner equipped with a volumetric transducer following either a shorter- or longer-term protocol. The later included bioluminescent imaging to quantify tumor cell viability. At termination, tumors were excised for ex vivo analysis. RESULTS: In vivo results showed that 3D H-scan US imaging is considerably more sensitive to tumor changes after apoptosis-inducing drug therapy as compared with traditional B-scan US. Although there was no difference at baseline (P > 0.99), H-scan US results from treated tumors exhibited progressive decreases in image intensity (up to 62.2% by day 3) that had a significant linear correlation with cancer cell nuclear size (R2 > 0.51, P < 0.001). Results were validated by histological data and a secondary longitudinal study with survival as the primary end point. DISCUSSION: Experimental results demonstrate that noninvasive 3D H-scan US imaging can detect an early breast tumor response to apoptosis-inducing drug therapy. Local in vivo H-scan US image intensity correlated with cancer cell nuclear size, which is one of the first observable changes of a cancer cell undergoing apoptosis and confirmed using histological techniques. Early imaging results seem to provide prognostic insight on longer-term tumor response. Overall, 3D H-scan US imaging is a promising technique that visualizes the entire tumor and detects breast cancer response at an early stage of therapy.
OBJECTIVES: Three-dimensional (3D) H-scan is a new ultrasound (US) technique that images the relative size of acoustic scatterers. The goal of this research was to evaluate use of 3D H-scan US imaging for monitoring early breast cancer response to neoadjuvant therapy using a preclinical murine model of breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preclinical studies were conducted using luciferase-positive breast cancer-bearing mice (n = 40). Anesthetized animals underwent US imaging at baseline before administration with an apoptosis-inducing drug or a saline control. Image data were acquired using a US scanner equipped with a volumetric transducer following either a shorter- or longer-term protocol. The later included bioluminescent imaging to quantify tumor cell viability. At termination, tumors were excised for ex vivo analysis. RESULTS: In vivo results showed that 3D H-scan US imaging is considerably more sensitive to tumor changes after apoptosis-inducing drug therapy as compared with traditional B-scan US. Although there was no difference at baseline (P > 0.99), H-scan US results from treated tumors exhibited progressive decreases in image intensity (up to 62.2% by day 3) that had a significant linear correlation with cancer cell nuclear size (R2 > 0.51, P < 0.001). Results were validated by histological data and a secondary longitudinal study with survival as the primary end point. DISCUSSION: Experimental results demonstrate that noninvasive 3D H-scan US imaging can detect an early breast tumor response to apoptosis-inducing drug therapy. Local in vivo H-scan US image intensity correlated with cancer cell nuclear size, which is one of the first observable changes of a cancer cell undergoing apoptosis and confirmed using histological techniques. Early imaging results seem to provide prognostic insight on longer-term tumor response. Overall, 3D H-scan US imaging is a promising technique that visualizes the entire tumor and detects breast cancer response at an early stage of therapy.
Authors: Rachel E Ellsworth; Heather L Blackburn; Craig D Shriver; Patrick Soon-Shiong; Darrell L Ellsworth Journal: Semin Cell Dev Biol Date: 2016-08-26 Impact factor: 7.727
Authors: E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Lyndsay N Harris; Gloria Broadwater; Nancy U Lin; Alexander Miron; Stuart J Schnitt; David Cowan; Jonathan Lara; Ira Bleiweiss; Donald Berry; Matthew Ellis; Daniel F Hayes; Eric P Winer; Lynn Dressler Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2006 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Lindsey J Graham; Matthew P Shupe; Erika J Schneble; Frederick L Flynt; Michael N Clemenshaw; Aaron D Kirkpatrick; Chris Gallagher; Aviram Nissan; Leonard Henry; Alexander Stojadinovic; George E Peoples; Nathan M Shumway Journal: J Cancer Date: 2014-01-05 Impact factor: 4.207
Authors: Maurice M Pasternak; Ali Sadeghi-Naini; Shawn M Ranieri; Anoja Giles; Michael L Oelze; Michael C Kolios; Gregory J Czarnota Journal: Oncoscience Date: 2016-09-12
Authors: Ella F Jones; Deep K Hathi; Rita Freimanis; Rita A Mukhtar; A Jo Chien; Laura J Esserman; Laura J Van't Veer; Bonnie N Joe; Nola M Hylton Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2020-06-09 Impact factor: 6.575