| Literature DB >> 34651665 |
Suyanee Thongchot1, Pranisa Jamjuntra1, Jaturawitt Prasopsiri1, Peti Thuwajit1, Nunghathai Sawasdee2, Naravat Poungvarin3, Malee Warnnissorn4, Doonyapat Sa-Nguanraksa5, Pornchai O-Charoenrat6, Pa-Thai Yenchitsomanus2, Chanitra Thuwajit1.
Abstract
Breast cancer cell lines are widely used as an in vitro system with which to study the mechanisms underlying biological and chemotherapeutic resistance. In the present study, two novel breast cancer cell lines designated as PC‑B‑142CA and PC‑B‑148CA were successfully established from HER2‑positive and triple‑negative (TN) breast cancer tissues. The cell lines were characterized by cytokeratin (CK), α‑smooth muscle actin (α‑SMA), fibroblast‑activation protein (FAP) and programmed death‑ligand 1 (PD‑L1). Cell proliferation was assessed using a colony formation assay, an MTS assay, 3‑dimensional (3‑D) spheroid and 3‑D organoid models. Wound healing and Transwell migration assays were used to explore the cell migration capability. The responses to doxorubicin (DOX) and paclitaxel (PTX) were evaluated by 3‑D spheroids. The results showed that the PC‑B‑142CA and PC‑B‑148CA cell lines were α‑SMA‑negative, FAP‑negative, CK‑positive and PD‑L1‑positive. Both cell lines were adherent with the ability of 3‑D‑multicellular spheroid and organoid formations; invadopodia were found in the spheroids/organoids of only PC‑B‑148CA. PC‑B‑142CA had a faster proliferative but lower metastatic rate compared to PC‑B‑148CA. Compared to MDA‑MB‑231, a commercial TN breast cancer cell line, PC‑B‑148CA had a similar CD44+/CD24‑ stemness property (96.90%), whereas only 8.75% were found in PC‑B‑142CA. The mutations of BRCA1/2, KIT, PIK3CA, SMAD4, and TP53 were found in PC‑B‑142CA cells related to the resistance of several drugs, whereas PC‑B‑148CA had mutated BRCA2, NRAS and TP53. In conclusion, PC‑B‑142CA can serve as a novel HER2‑positive breast cancer cell line for drug resistance studies; while PC‑B‑148CA is a novel TN breast cancer cell line suitable for metastatic and stemness‑related properties.Entities:
Keywords: breast cancer; cell line; cytotoxicity; migration; mutation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34651665 PMCID: PMC8548790 DOI: 10.3892/or.2021.8205
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Rep ISSN: 1021-335X Impact factor: 3.906
Demographic data of the patients and the characteristics of the established cell lines.
| Characteristics | PC-B-142CA | PC-B-148CA |
|---|---|---|
| Patients | ||
| Origin | Breast, metastasis to axilla skin | Breast, right |
| Age (years) | 58 | 50 |
| Sex | Female | Female |
| Tumor size (cm3) | 3.9×3.6×3.0 | 3.5×3.0×3.0 |
| Gross pathology | Angiolymphatic invasion | Angiolymphatic invasion |
| Clinical stage | IV | II |
| ER | Negative | Negative |
| PR | Negative | Negative |
| HER2 | Positive | Negative |
| Ki-67 | Positive | Positive |
| Cell lines | ||
| Growth pattern | Adherent | Adherent |
| Doubling time (h) | 45.0±3.0 | 155.7±5.2 |
| CK | Positive | Positive |
| α-SMA | Negative | Negative |
| FAP | Negative | Negative |
| PD-L1 | Positive | Positive |
| ER | Negative | Negative |
| PR | Negative | Negative |
| HER2 | Positive | Negative |
ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; CK, cytokeratin; α-SMA, α-smooth muscle actin; FAP, fibroblast-activation protein; PD-L1, programmed death-ligand 1.
Figure 1.Characterization of PC-B-142CA and PC-B-148CA cell lines. (A) Chromosomal pattern and growth properties of the two in-house established breast cancer cell lines. The karyotype of PC-B-142CA (A) and PC-B-148CA (B) cells. (C) Proliferation properties of breast cancer cells by clonogenic assay staining with 0.5% crystal violet was performed at day 10 after seeding. (D) The colony numbers were counted by photometric measurements using the CellCounter software version 0.2.1. Three independent experiments were performed. (E) The morphology of cells under a phase contrast light microscopy with 0.5% crystal violet staining; scale bars, 20 µm. (F) Growth curve analysis by counting viable cell numbers using the MTS assay at 0, 24, 48 and 72 h. *P<0.05; **P<0.01.
Figure 2.Morphology of the in-house breast cancer cells. (A) PC-B-142CA and (C) PC-B-148CA cell lines. Typical morphology of stable culture cells under a phase contrast light microscopy (×200 magnification; scale bars, 50 µm). (Top panels) Expression of biological markers of epithelial cells by immunofluorescence staining of PanCK (red fluorescence), CK-19 (red fluorescence), PD-L1 (green fluorescence), α-SMA (red fluorescence) and FAP (green fluorescence); images captured at ×400 magnification; scale bars, 20 µm. Staining with Hoechst33342 (blue fluorescence) was conducted to visualize chromatin. (Lower left panels) Phase-contrast micrographs showing the immunohistochemistry staining of ER, PR and HER2; scale bars, 20 µm. (B and D) The 3-D formation ability is shown by 3-D spheroids at day 5 and 3-D organoids at day 14. Invadopodia were observed in only 3-D PC-B-148CA cells (black arrow). CK, cytokeratin; PD-L1, programmed death-ligand 1; α-SMA, α-smooth muscle actin; FAP, fibroblast-activation protein; ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2.
Figure 3.Migration ability of PC-B-142CA and PC-B-148CA cells compared to commercial MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cell lines. (A) The migration assay was performed by scratch wound assay at 30 min, 18 h and 24 h after incubation, and (B) Transwell migration assay at 24 h. Representative images captured at ×400 magnification; scale bar, 20 µm, are shown. (A and C) Photographs of scratch wound were taken and the width of the wound area was measured at the indicated times. The graphs report the rate of wound healing (%) for each time point estimated using ImageJ software. Data represent the average ± SD wound calculated for three different fields per each condition in three independent experiments. (D) Quantitation of the migratory cells in 5 fields randomly chosen was performed with ImageJ. Data represent the number of migrated cells in triplicate. (E) Western blot analysis of E-cadherin, MMP-9 and MMP-13 proteins in different breast cancer cells. β-actin was used as a loading control. (F-H) Densitometry data from three separate experiments, expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) are shown in the histograms. (I and J) Flow cytometry analysis of PC-B-142CA and PC-B-148CA cells using CD44 and CD24 markers. MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 were used as control. An isotype (Iso) was used as a control to each cell line. #Compared to the CD24-CD44- population. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001. MMP, matrix metalloproteinase.
Figure 4.DOX and PTX induce cell death in PC-B-142CA and PC-B-148CA cells. (A) PC-B-142CA and (C) PC-B-148CA cells were plated and exposed to 0, 0.01, 0.1, 1 and 10 µM of DOX and (B) PC-B-142CA and (D) PC-B-148CA cells were treated with 0, 0.01, 0.1, 1 and 10 µM of PTX for 24, 48, 72 and 96 h (0 h was used as the normalization). Quantitative results of MTS staining were performed in triplicate. (E and F) Phase-contrast micrographs showing the morphology of 3-D sphere-formation of two breast cancer cell lines tested with 0, 1 and 10 µM of DOX (E) and of PTX (F) were tested for 72 h (day 7 of culture). Images were captured at ×200 magnification; scale bar, 50 µm. (G and H) Expression of BAX and BCL-2 in PC-B-142CA and PC-B-148CA treated or not with 0, 1 and 10 µM of DOX (G) and of PTX (H) for 72 h. β-actin was used as protein loading control. Densitometry analysis of the relative band intensity of the western blotting. *P<0.05; **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001 compared with the untreated control. DOX, doxorubicin; PTX, paclitaxel.
The drug-targeted gene alterations in the breast cancer cell lines.
| % Mutation (Pathogenic[ | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Gene | Exon | Nucleotide alteration | Amino acid variant | MCF-7 | MDA-MB-231 | PC-B-142CA | PC-B-148CA |
| ALK | 29 | c.4587C>G | p.D1529E | WT | 62.49% | 33% | 31% |
| ALK | 29 | c.4472A>G | p.K1491R | WT | 64.03% | 33% | 32% |
| ALK | 29 | c.4381A>G | p.I1461V | 99% | 99.03% | 99% | 99% |
| ALK | 23 | c.3600G>C | p.A1200A | WT | WT | WT | 34% |
| ALK | 18 | c.3036G>A | p.T1012T | WT | WT | 65% | WT |
| ALK | 15 | c.2535T>C | p.G845G | 100% | WT | 65% | WT |
| ALK | 2 | c.702T>A | p.P234P | 100% | 66.88% | 68% | 100% |
| ALK | 1 | c.27C>G | p.L9L | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| PIK3CA | 1 | c.-77+8483C>T | – | WT | 28.28% | WT | WT |
| PIK3CA | 1 | c.-76-23509A>G | – | WT | 30.66% | WT | WT |
| PIK3CA | 10 | c.1633G>A | p.E545K | 58%[ | WT | WT | WT |
| PIK3CA | 8 | c.1258T>C | p.C420R | WT | WT | 68%[ | WT |
| FGFR3 | 14 | c.1953G>A | p.T651T | 100% | 99.15% | 99% | 100% |
| PDGFRA | 7 | c.939T>G | p.G313G | WT | 35.17% | 48% | WT |
| PDGFRA | 10 | c.1432T>C | p.S478P | WT | 30.59% | WT | WT |
| PDGFRA | 12 | c.1701A>G | p.P567P | 99% | 99.44% | 100% | 100% |
| PDGFRA | 13 | c.1809G>A | p.A603A | WT | 35.37% | WT | WT |
| PDGFRA | 18 | c.2472C>T | p.V824V | WT | 34.80% | WT | WT |
| KIT | 16 | c.2362-77G>A | – | WT | 36.76% | WT | WT |
| KIT | 18 | c.2586G>C | p.L862L | WT | 34.51% | WT | WT |
| KIT | 18 | c.2515G>A | p.E839K | WT | WT | 50%[ | WT |
| EGFR | 4 | c.474C>T | p.N158N | 100% | 25% | WT | 100% |
| EGFR | 13 | c.1562G>A | p.R521K | WT | WT | 100% | WT |
| EGFR | 16 | c.1968C>T | p.H656H | 83% | WT | WT | 49% |
| EGFR | 18 | c.2184+19G>A | – | 78% | WT | WT | 48% |
| EGFR | 20 | c.2361G>A | p.Q787Q | 99% | 98.77% | WT | 48% |
| EGFR | 25 | c.2982C>T | p.D994D | 83% | WT | 34% | 100% |
| BRAF | 15 | c.1805C>G | p.S602C | WT | WT | 45.00% | WT |
| BRAF | 16 | c.1929A>G | p.G643G | WT | 99.36% | 100% | WT |
| BRAF | 11 | c.1391G>T | p.G464V | WT | 96.08%[ | WT | WT |
| KRAS | 5 | c.*2505T>G | – | 31% | WT | WT | WT |
| KRAS | 2 | c.38G>A | p.G13D | WT | 98.83%[ | WT | WT |
| ERBB2 | – | – | – | WT | WT | Amplificationa | WT |
| ERBB2 | 27 | c.3508C>G | p.P1170A | 99% | 98.51% | 3.77% | WT |
| ERBB2 | 17 | c.1960A>G | p.I654V | 100% | WT | WT | WT |
| ERBB2 | 17 | c.1963A>G | p.I655V | 100% | WT | WT | WT |
| ERBB2 | 27 | c.3631C>G | p.P1211A | WT | WT | 3.67% | WT |
| ERBB2 | 27 | c.3651C>T | p.F1217F | WT | WT | 4.21% | WT |
| ERBB3 | 27 | c.3355A>T | p.S1119C | WT | WT | WT | 99% |
| ESR1 | 10 | c.1782G>A | p.T594T | 65% | WT | WT | 56% |
| ESR1 | 3 | c.30T>C | p.S10S | 23% | WT | 100% | WT |
| MAP2K2 | 2 | c.192C>T | p.V64V | WT | 53.04% | WT | WT |
| MET | 20 | c.3912C>T | p.D1304D | 49% | WT | 99% | 67% |
| NOTCH1 | 27 | c.5094C>T | p.D1698D | 43% | WT | 99% | 99% |
| SMAD4 | 6 | c.670C>T | p.Q224* | WT | WT | 100%[ | WT |
| BRCA1 | 10 | c.2612C>T | p.P871L | ND | ND | 93% | WT |
| BRCA2 | 10 | c.1274C>G | p.S425C | ND | ND | 99% | WT |
| BRCA2 | 10 | c.1114A>C | p.N372H | ND | ND | WT | 99% |
| BRCA2 | 11 | c.4563A>G | p.L1521L | ND | ND | WT | 100% |
| BRCA2 | 11 | c.6513G>C | p.V2171V | ND | ND | WT | 99% |
| BRCA2 | 14 | c.7397T>C | p.V2466A | ND | ND | WT | 100% |
| BRCA2 | 17 | c.7806-14T>C | – | ND | ND | 100% | WT |
| BRCA2 | 23 | c.9097dupA | p.T3033fs*11 | ND | ND | WT | 16%[ |
| TP53 | 6 | c.586C>T | p.R196* | ND | ND | WT | 100%[ |
| TP53 | 8 | c.839G>A | p.R280K | ND | ND | WT | WT |
| TP53 | 4 | c.215C>G | p.P72R | ND | ND | WT | WT |
| TP53 | 7 | c.695T>C | p.1232T | ND | ND | 98%[ | WT |
*, stop codon; -, not found; WT, wild-type; ND, not done.
Pathogenic mutation: the variant which is considered and well established as disease causing. ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; PIK3CA, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, catalytic subunit α; FGFR3, fibroblast growth factor receptor 3; PDGFRA, platelet derived growth factor receptor α; KIT, proto-oncogene, also known asc-Kit; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ERBB2, Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2, also known as HER2/neu; ERBB3, Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 3; ESR1, estrogen receptor 1; MAP2K2, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 2; MET, MET proto-oncogene; receptor tyrosine kinase; NOTCH1, Notch receptor 1; SMAD4, SMAD family member 4; BRCA1/2, breast cancer 1/2.