Zhenying Chen1, Apeng Yang2, Jiaying Zhang1, Aihong Chen1, Yuanqing Zhang3, Chao Huang1, Shaoming Chen1, Shaobo Yao4, Weibing Miao5,6. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fujian Province, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, No. 20 Chazhong Road, Taijiang District, Fuzhou, 350005, People's Republic of China. 2. Department of Hematology, Fujian Province, the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, People's Republic of China. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, Fujian Province, the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, People's Republic of China. 4. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fujian Province, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, No. 20 Chazhong Road, Taijiang District, Fuzhou, 350005, People's Republic of China. yaoshaobo008@163.com. 5. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fujian Province, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, No. 20 Chazhong Road, Taijiang District, Fuzhou, 350005, People's Republic of China. miaoweibing@126.com. 6. Fujian Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Cancer, Fujian Province, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, People's Republic of China. miaoweibing@126.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the value of [68 Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT for the detection of lesions in central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) patients before chemotherapy, during treatment and suspected CSNL recurrence, compared with 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). PROCEDURES: Twenty-six patients with newly or previously diagnosed CNSL who underwent [68 Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT were included retrospectively. Histopathological results, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and follow-up were used as the standard reference. The accuracy of lesion detection, maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of tumors, and ratio of tumor-to-normal brain (T/N) with [68 Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT were calculated and compared to those obtained with [18F]FDG PET/CT. CXCR4 expression was analyzed through immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Of 26 patients, 18 were newly diagnosed with a total of 23 lesions, 4 had recurrent with 4 lesions, and 4 underwent a mid-term treatment assessment after 4 cycles of chemotherapy (3 achieved complete response (CR), 1 experienced progressive disease (PD) with a total of 8 lesions). Thirty-five lesions were all clearly detected with favorable contrast by [68 Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT (accuracy, 100%), consistent with the results of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI). The SUVmax of positive lesions in [68 Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT was correlated with tumor size (r = 0.555, P = 0.001). In 21 patients, compared with [18F]FDG PET/CT, [68 Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT showed a remarkably higher T/N ratio (21.93 ± 10.77 vs 4.29 ± 2.16, P = 0.000) and detected 5 more lesions in the mid-term treatment assessment of patients (P = 0.026). The CXCR4 expression of CNSL lesions was correlated with SUVmax of [68 Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT (r = 0.772, P = 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: CXCR4-directed PET/CT using [68 Ga]Pentixafor, with excellent tumor-to-background contrast, might be a more promising agent for the detection of lesions in CNSL patients than [18F]FDG PET/CT.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the value of [68 Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT for the detection of lesions in central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) patients before chemotherapy, during treatment and suspected CSNL recurrence, compared with 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). PROCEDURES: Twenty-six patients with newly or previously diagnosed CNSL who underwent [68 Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT were included retrospectively. Histopathological results, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and follow-up were used as the standard reference. The accuracy of lesion detection, maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of tumors, and ratio of tumor-to-normal brain (T/N) with [68 Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT were calculated and compared to those obtained with [18F]FDG PET/CT. CXCR4 expression was analyzed through immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Of 26 patients, 18 were newly diagnosed with a total of 23 lesions, 4 had recurrent with 4 lesions, and 4 underwent a mid-term treatment assessment after 4 cycles of chemotherapy (3 achieved complete response (CR), 1 experienced progressive disease (PD) with a total of 8 lesions). Thirty-five lesions were all clearly detected with favorable contrast by [68 Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT (accuracy, 100%), consistent with the results of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI). The SUVmax of positive lesions in [68 Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT was correlated with tumor size (r = 0.555, P = 0.001). In 21 patients, compared with [18F]FDG PET/CT, [68 Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT showed a remarkably higher T/N ratio (21.93 ± 10.77 vs 4.29 ± 2.16, P = 0.000) and detected 5 more lesions in the mid-term treatment assessment of patients (P = 0.026). The CXCR4 expression of CNSL lesions was correlated with SUVmax of [68 Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT (r = 0.772, P = 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: CXCR4-directed PET/CT using [68 Ga]Pentixafor, with excellent tumor-to-background contrast, might be a more promising agent for the detection of lesions in CNSL patients than [18F]FDG PET/CT.