| Literature DB >> 34650619 |
Suyun Yu1, Caili Zhang2, Zhijun Yan1, Qingqing Fang3, Xiwen Gao1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have been observed to benefit from tiotropium bromide. However, there are few studies of tiotropium bromide on sputum and sputum viscosity. To evaluate the effect of tiotropium bromide on mucus hypersecretion, a randomized, double-blind controlled trial was performed.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34650619 PMCID: PMC8510842 DOI: 10.1155/2021/1341644
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.238
The standard of clinical macroscopic observation of sputum characteristics.
| Symptoms/signs | Grading standard | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 points (-) | 1 points (+) | 2 points (++) | 3 points (+++) | |
| Characteristics of sputum | Pure and transparent, nonmucinous sputum | A little purulent transparent sputum | Purulent mucus (purulent<2/3) | Purulent mucus (purulent≥2/3) |
| Difficulty of expectoration | No phlegm | Sputum is easy to cough up | Sputum is difficult to cough up | On difficult cough |
| Sputum volume | The amount of expectoration was less than 10 ml | The expectoration volume is 10~50 ml day and night | The expectoration volume is 50~100 ml day and night | The amount of expectoration was more than 100 ml day and night |
| Cough | No cough | Mild cough, does not affect normal life and work | Between mild cough and severe cough | Severe cough, frequent cough day and night, affect work and sleep |
Comparison of baseline data between the two groups.
| Group | Cases | Sex ratio (M/F) | Age (years) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min | Max | Average | |||
| Treatment | 58 | 35/23 | 43 | 82 | 67.13 ± 6.11 |
| Control | 59 | 39/20 | 45 | 80 | 67.98 ± 5.82 |
| Test statistics |
|
| |||
|
| 0.65 | 0.446 | |||
Comparison of sputum indexes between the two groups before and after treatment.
| Group | Cases | Sputum score |
| Sputum Ca2+ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | ||
| Treatment | 58 | 7.12 ± 2.5 | 3.98 ± 1.39 | 901.89 ± 176.53 | 517.24 ± 103.25 | 4.65 ± 1.52 | 2.93 ± 0.55 |
| Control | 59 | 6.89 ± 2.37 | 4.71 ± 1.45 | 871.18 ± 175.97 | 536.03 ± 116.26 | 4.39 ± 1.46 | 2.99 ± 0.76 |
|
| 0.594 | -2.77 | 0.715 | -0.65 | 1.257 | -0.462 | |
|
| 0.554 |
| 0.476 | 0.518 | 0.213 | 0.644 | |
Comparison of pulmonary function between two groups of COPD.
| Group | FEV1/FVC | FEV1/predicted value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | Before | After | ||
| Treatment | 58 | 52.39 ± 6.65 | 59.29 ± 7.24 | 59.51 ± 5.85 | 66.89 ± 5.70 |
| Control | 59 | 51.44 ± 5.64 | 58.83 ± 5.07 | 58.67 ± 5.63 | 65.98 ± 6.24 |
|
| 0.838 | 0.399 | 0.79 | 0.825 | |
|
| 0.399 | 0.691 | 0.431 | 0.411 | |