| Literature DB >> 34649975 |
Alexander G Mathioudakis1,2,3, Fekri Abroug4, Alvar Agusti5,6, Sachin Ananth7, Per Bakke8, Konstantinos Bartziokas9, Bianca Beghe10, Andras Bikov1,2, Thomas Bradbury11, Guy Brusselle12,13, Cordula Cadus14,15, Courtney Coleman16, Marco Contoli17, Alexandru Corlateanu18, Olga Corlateanu19, Gerard J Criner20, Balazs Csoma21, Alexander Emelyanov22, Rosa Faner5, Gustavo Fernandez Romero20, Zeineb Hammouda4, Peter Horváth21, Arturo Huerta Garcia5,23, Michael Jacobs20, Christine Jenkins11, Guy Joos13, Olga Kharevich24, Konstantinos Kostikas9, Elena Lapteva24, Zsofia Lazar21, Joerg D Leuppi14,15, Carol Liddle16, John Linnell16, Alejandra López-Giraldo5,6, Vanessa M McDonald25,26,27, Rune Nielsen8,28, Alberto Papi17, Isabel Saraiva16, Galina Sergeeva22, Agni Sioutkou9, Pradeesh Sivapalan29,30, Elizabeth Stovold31, Hao Wang32, Fuqiang Wen32, Janelle Yorke33,34, Paula R Williamson35, Jørgen Vestbo36,2, Jens-Ulrik Jensen29,37,3.
Abstract
Clinical trials evaluating the management of acute exacerbations of COPD assess heterogeneous outcomes, often omitting those that are clinically relevant or more important to patients. We have developed a core outcome set, a consensus-based minimum set of important outcomes that we recommend are evaluated in all future clinical trials on exacerbations management, to improve their quality and comparability. COPD exacerbations outcomes were identified through methodological systematic reviews and qualitative interviews with 86 patients from 11 countries globally. The most critical outcomes were prioritised for inclusion in the core outcome set through a two-round Delphi survey completed by 1063 participants (256 patients, 488 health professionals and 319 clinical academics) from 88 countries in five continents. Two global, multi-stakeholder, virtual consensus meetings were conducted to 1) finalise the core outcome set and 2) prioritise a single measurement instrument to be used for evaluating each of the prioritised outcomes. Consensus was informed by rigorous methodological systematic reviews. The views of patients with COPD were accounted for at all stages of the project. Survival, treatment success, breathlessness, quality of life, activities of daily living, the need for a higher level of care, arterial blood gases, disease progression, future exacerbations and hospital admissions, treatment safety and adherence were all included in the core outcome set. Focused methodological research was recommended to further validate and optimise some of the selected measurement instruments. The panel did not consider the prioritised set of outcomes and associated measurement instruments to be burdensome for patients and health professionals to use.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34649975 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.02006-2021
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Respir J ISSN: 0903-1936 Impact factor: 33.795