| Literature DB >> 34649131 |
Baibing Yang1, Dustin Luse1, Yanna Cao1, Tien Ko1, Run Wang2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Vacuum erectile device (VED) therapy is commonly used for penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy, however, the underlying mechanism of this effect is not fully understood. AIM: To evaluate the presence of label-retaining cells (LRCs), cells with long-term retention of 5-ethynyl-2-deoxyuridine (EdU) labeling and recognized as adult stem cells or progenitor-like cells, in cavernous tissue after VED treatment using a BCNC rat model.Entities:
Keywords: Bilateral Cavernous Nerve Crush; Erectile Dysfunction; Label-Retaining Cells; Stem Cells; Vacuum Erectile Device
Year: 2021 PMID: 34649131 PMCID: PMC8766272 DOI: 10.1016/j.esxm.2021.100442
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sex Med ISSN: 2050-1161 Impact factor: 2.491
Figure 1Time course of EdU injection, BCNC surgery and VED treatment. (A) Natal-labeled rats. The rat pups (1 d old) were intraperitoneally injected with EdU (50 µg/g, BID for 3 d), when received from the vender to identify label-retaining cells (LRCs). Bilateral cavernous nerve crush (BCNC) or sham surgery were conducted at six-weeks of age. (B) Adult-labeled rats. The 6-wk-old adult rats underwent BCNC or sham surgery followed with intraperitoneal injection of EdU (50 µg/g, once) 1 wk after surgery to identify LRCs. Vacuum erectile device (VED) treatment was conducted for part of natal- and adult-labeled rats (n = 6) one week after BCNC surgery. Intracavernous pressure (ICP) were measured after 4 weeks of VED treatment, and the penile tissue was harvested for EdU detection.
Figure 2Erectile function was injured after BCNC surgery and partly restored after VED treatment. Intracavernous pressure (ICP) was measured and normalized to mean arterial pressure (MAP) to quantify erectile function. For both natal- and adult-labeled rats, each group included 6 rats. *P < .05.
Figure 3Limited role of LRCs in the restoration of erectile function after VED treatment. Immunofluorescence was performed on the penis tissue sections and quantified. (A) The percentage of EdU positive cells in natal-labeled rats (fold to sham group). No significant difference was observed among 3 groups. (B) Representative image of EdU positive cells of natal-labeled rats. (C) The percentage of EdU positive cells in adult-labeled rats (fold to sham group) increased in BCNC group (P < .05) but didn't change significantly in VED group (P = .35). (D) Representative image of EdU positive cells of adult-labeled rats. Bar = 100 µm. * P < .05. BCNC + V = VED treated BCNC rats.