Literature DB >> 34648374

Modern approaches on stem cells and scaffolding technology for osteogenic differentiation and regeneration.

Shivaani Kirankumar1,2, Narasimman Gurusamy1, Sheeja Rajasingh1, Vinoth Sigamani1, Jayavardini Vasanthan1,2, Selene G Perales1, Johnson Rajasingh1,3,4.   

Abstract

The process of bone repair has always been a natural mystery. Although bones do repair themselves, supplemental treatment is required for the initiation of the self-regeneration process. Predominantly, surgical procedures are employed for bone regeneration. Recently, cell-based therapy for bone regeneration has proven to be more effective than traditional methods, as it eliminates the immune risk and painful surgeries. In clinical trials, various stem cells, especially mesenchymal stem cells, have shown to be more efficient for the treatment of several bone-related diseases, such as non-union fracture, osteogenesis imperfecta, osteosarcoma, and osteoporosis. Furthermore, the stem cells grown in a suitable three-dimensional scaffold support were found to be more efficient for osteogenesis. It has been shown that the three-dimensional bioscaffolds support and simulate an in vivo environment, which helps in differentiation of stem cells into bone cells. Bone regeneration in patients with bone disorders can be improved through modification of stem cells with several osteogenic factors or using stem cells as carriers for osteogenic factors. In this review, we focused on the various types of stem cells and scaffolds that are being used for bone regeneration. In addition, the molecular mechanisms of various transcription factors, signaling pathways that support bone regeneration and the senescence of the stem cells, which limits bone regeneration, have been discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Stem cells; bone regeneration; osteogenic differentiation; scaffolds

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34648374      PMCID: PMC8919323          DOI: 10.1177/15353702211052927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)        ISSN: 1535-3699


  120 in total

Review 1.  Novel materials for bone and cartilage regeneration.

Authors:  Ian C Bonzani; Julian H George; Molly M Stevens
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 2.  Wnt and hedgehog signaling pathways in bone development.

Authors:  Timothy F Day; Yingzi Yang
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  Senescence of mesenchymal stem cells (Review).

Authors:  Yi Li; Qiong Wu; Yujia Wang; Li Li; Hong Bu; Ji Bao
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.101

Review 4.  New perspectives on osteogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  Antonella Forlino; Wayne A Cabral; Aileen M Barnes; Joan C Marini
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 43.330

5.  The axolotl limb: a model for bone development, regeneration and fracture healing.

Authors:  Cara Hutchison; Mireille Pilote; Stéphane Roy
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-08-21       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Recapitulation of endochondral bone formation using human adult mesenchymal stem cells as a paradigm for developmental engineering.

Authors:  Celeste Scotti; Beatrice Tonnarelli; Adam Papadimitropoulos; Arnaud Scherberich; Stefan Schaeren; Alexandra Schauerte; Javier Lopez-Rios; Rolf Zeller; Andrea Barbero; Ivan Martin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Growth hormone, insulin-like growth factors, and the skeleton.

Authors:  Andrea Giustina; Gherardo Mazziotti; Ernesto Canalis
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 19.871

8.  Design and characterization of a novel chitosan/nanocrystalline calcium phosphate composite scaffold for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Betsy M Chesnutt; Ann M Viano; Youling Yuan; Yunzhi Yang; Teja Guda; Mark R Appleford; Joo L Ong; Warren O Haggard; Joel D Bumgardner
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.396

9.  Adipose derived pericytes rescue fractures from a failure of healing--non-union.

Authors:  T Tawonsawatruk; C C West; I R Murray; C Soo; B Péault; A H R W Simpson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Regenerative Potential of DPSCs and Revascularization: Direct, Paracrine or Autocrine Effect?

Authors:  Vincenzo Mattei; Stefano Martellucci; Fanny Pulcini; Francesca Santilli; Maurizio Sorice; Simona Delle Monache
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 5.739

View more
  1 in total

1.  An optimized 3D-printed perfusion bioreactor for homogeneous cell seeding in bone substitute scaffolds for future chairside applications.

Authors:  Nadja Engel; Carsten Fechner; Annika Voges; Robert Ott; Jan Stenzel; Stefan Siewert; Carina Bergner; Valeria Khaimov; Jan Liese; Klaus-Peter Schmitz; Bernd Joachim Krause; Bernhard Frerich
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.