Literature DB >> 34647997

Ultra-processed food consumption among US adults from 2001 to 2018.

Filippa Juul1, Niyati Parekh1,2,3, Euridice Martinez-Steele4,5, Carlos Augusto Monteiro4,5, Virginia W Chang1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence links ultra-processed foods to poor diet quality and chronic diseases. Understanding dietary trends is essential to inform priorities and policies to improve diet quality and prevent diet-related chronic diseases. Data are lacking, however, for trends in ultra-processed food intake.
OBJECTIVES: We examined US secular trends in food consumption according to processing level from 2001 to 2018.
METHODS: We analyzed dietary data collected by 24-h recalls from adult participants (aged >19 y; N  = 40,937) in 9 cross-sectional waves of the NHANES (2001-2002 to 2017-2018). We calculated participants' intake of minimally processed foods, processed culinary ingredients, processed foods, and ultra-processed foods as the relative contribution to daily energy intake (%kcal) using the NOVA framework. Trends analyses were performed using linear regression, testing for linear trends by modeling the 9 surveys as an ordinal independent variable. Models were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education level, and income. Consumption trends were reported for the full sample and stratified by sex, age groups, race/ethnicity, education level, and income level.
RESULTS: Adjusting for changes in population characteristics, the consumption of ultra-processed foods increased among all US adults from 2001-2002 to 2017-2018 (from 53.5 to 57.0 %kcal; P-trend < 0.001). The trend was consistent among all sociodemographic subgroups, except Hispanics, in stratified analyses. In contrast, the consumption of minimally processed foods decreased significantly over the study period (from 32.7 to 27.4 %kcal; P-trend < 0.001) and across all sociodemographic strata. The consumption of processed culinary ingredients increased from 3.9 to 5.4 %kcal (P-trend < 0.001), whereas the intake of processed foods remained stable at ∼10 %kcal throughout the study period (P-trend = 0.052).
CONCLUSIONS: The current findings highlight the high consumption of ultra-processed foods in all parts of the US population and demonstrate that intake has continuously increased in the majority of the population in the past 2 decades.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NHANES; NOVA; dietary intake; nutrition surveillance; processed foods

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34647997     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  12 in total

1.  Association between ultra-processed food consumption and cognitive performance in US older adults: a cross-sectional analysis of the NHANES 2011-2014.

Authors:  Barbara R Cardoso; Priscila Machado; Euridice Martinez Steele
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 5.614

2.  Acculturation and Associations with Ultra-processed Food Consumption among Asian Americans: NHANES, 2011-2018.

Authors:  Krithi Pachipala; Vishal Shankar; Zachary Rezler; Ranjana Vittal; Shahmir H Ali; Malathi S Srinivasan; Latha Palaniappan; Eugene Yang; Filippa Juul; Tali Elfassy
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.687

3.  Food insecurity and ultra-processed food consumption: the modifying role of participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).

Authors:  Cindy W Leung; Aarohee P Fulay; Lindsey Parnarouskis; Euridice Martinez-Steele; Ashley N Gearhardt; Julia A Wolfson
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 8.472

4.  Perspective: Novel Approaches to Evaluate Dietary Quality: Combining Methods to Enhance Measurement for Dietary Surveillance and Interventions.

Authors:  Maya K Vadiveloo; Filippa Juul; Mercedes Sotos-Prieto; Niyati Parekh
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 11.567

Review 5.  How Does the Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program Work? A Theory of Change.

Authors:  Kirsten H Leng; Amy L Yaroch; Nadine Budd Nugent; Sarah A Stotz; James Krieger
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 6.706

6.  Association between Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet and Anthropometric and Health Variables in College-Aged Males.

Authors:  Pablo Prieto-González; Jorge Sánchez-Infante; Luis Miguel Fernández-Galván
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 6.706

Review 7.  Maternal Consumption of Ultra-Processed Foods-Rich Diet and Perinatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Walkyria O Paula; Erika S O Patriota; Vivian S S Gonçalves; Nathalia Pizato
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 6.706

8.  Processed foods purchase profiles in urban India in 2013 and 2016: a cluster and multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Mehroosh Tak; Cherry Law; Rosemary Green; Bhavani Shankar; Laura Cornelsen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 3.006

9.  Making Healthy, Sustainable Diets Accessible and Achievable: A New Framework for Assessing the Nutrition, Environmental, and Equity Impacts of Packaged Foods.

Authors:  David I Gustafson; Eric A Decker; Adam Drewnowski; Michael W Hamm; Jane Hwang; Kathleen A Merrigan
Journal:  Curr Dev Nutr       Date:  2022-08-27

10.  Dietary Copper Intake and Risk of Stroke in Adults: A Case-Control Study Based on National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2013-2018.

Authors:  Lixiang Yang; Xun Chen; Huilin Cheng; Lihua Zhang
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.