| Literature DB >> 34643806 |
Jun Thorsteinsdottir1, Torleif Sandner2, Annamaria Biczok3, Robert Forbrig2, Sebastian Siller3, Patricia Bernasconi4, Andrea Szelényi3, Thomas Liebig2, Jörg-Christian Tonn3, Christian Schichor3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to evaluate the additional benefit of intraoperative computed tomography (iCT), intraoperative computed tomography angiography (iCTA), and intraoperative computed tomography perfusion (iCTP) in the intraoperative detection of impending ischemia to established methods (indocyanine green videoangiography (ICGVA), microDoppler, intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM)) for initiating timely therapeutic measures.Entities:
Keywords: Aneurysm; CT angiography; CT perfusion; Clipping; Intraoperative computed tomography
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34643806 PMCID: PMC8599411 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-021-05022-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) ISSN: 0001-6268 Impact factor: 2.216
Fig. 1Patient inclusion
Patient and aneurysm characteristics
| Characteristics | All patients ( | No deficit ( | Immediate postoperative deficit ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median age [years] | 58.0 | 57.4 | 59.2 | 0.389 |
| Age range [years] | 28–82 | |||
| Gender (female/male) | 82/11 (88.2/11.8) | 73/9 (89.0/11.0) | 9/2 (81.8/18.2) | 0.384 |
| SAH | 4 (5.7) | 3 (3.7) | 1 (9.1) | 0.401 |
| Multiple aneurysms | 7 (7.5) | 6 (7.3) | 1 (9.1) | 0.599 |
| Characteristics | All aneurysms (n = 100) | Aneurysms of pat. with no deficit ( | Aneurysms of pat. with immediate postoperative deficit ( | |
| Aneurysm location | 0.08 | |||
| MCA | 48 (48.0) | 44 (50.0) | 4 (33.3) | |
| ICA | 14 (14.0) | 10 (11.4) | 4 (33.3) | |
| ACA | 11 (11.0) | 11 (12.5) | 0 (0) | |
| ACoA | 19 (19.0) | 15 (17.0) | 4 (33.3) | |
| PCoA | 8 (8.0) | 8 (9.1) | 0 (0) | |
| Side (right/left) | 49/32 (60.5/39.5) | 46/27 (63.0/37.0) | 3/5 (37.5/62.5) | 0.154 |
| Median/mean size [mm] | 6.0/ 6.5 | 6.0/ 5.9 | 6.7/ 8.5 | 0.003 |
| Size range [mm] | 2–26 | |||
| Aneurysm size > 5 mm | 57 (57.0) | 46 (52.3) | 11 (91.7) | 0.008 |
| Temporary clipping | 13 (13.0) | 9 (10.2) | 4 (33.3) | 0.048 |
| Median temporary clipping time [min] | 6.5 | 5.1 | 12.3 | 0.024 |
| Temporary clipping time range [min] | 2–28 |
MCA middle cerebral artery, ICA internal carotid artery, ACA anterior cerebral artery, ACoA anterior communicating artery, PCoA posterior communicating artery, SAH subarachnoid hemorrhage
Fig. 2A 70-year-old female patient with an incidental irregularly configurated ACoA aneurysm was operated (a before clipping, b after clipping). Intraoperative ICGVA showed a difference in flow velocity of the two A2 branches (c, d). However, iCTP showed no difference in CBF, CBV, TTD, or MTT (e)
Patients with immediate postoperative neurological deficit and the corresponding results of intraoperative CTA, CTP, ICGVA, and IOM
| No | Age [years] | Sex | SAH | Location | Size [mm] | iCTA | iCTP | ICGVA | IOM | Resulting ischemia postop (CT/MRI) | Outcome postop (< 6 h) | mRS postop | Outcome at discharge | mRS one week | Outcome 8 weeks | mRS 8 weeks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal iCTP, but early neurological deficit | ||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 69 | F | N | ACoA | 6.7 | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal | Fornix ischemia | Disoriented | 2 | Memory deficit | 2 | Memory deficit | 1 |
| 2 | 52 | F | N | ACoA | 8 | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal | Fornix ischemia | Disoriented | 3 | Disoriented | 3 | Memory deficit | 2 |
| 3 | 50 | F | N | ICA | 6.7 | Normal | Normal | Normal | Missing | Ischemia left capsula interna | Severe hemiparesis | 4 | Reduced fine motor skills | 1 | Reduced fine motor skills | 1 |
| 4 | 50 | M | N | ICA | 6.3 | Normal | Normal | Normal | Impaired | Mismatch in postoperative iCTP and ischemia left capsula interna | Severe hemiparesis | 4 | Severe hemiparesis | 4 | Slight hemiparesis | 2 |
| Mismatch in iCTP harboring conservative treatment strategies | ||||||||||||||||
| 5 | 59 | F | N | MCA | 6 | Normal | Slight mismatch (temporal) | Normal | Normal | No ischemia | Slight hemiparesis and aphasia | 3 | No deficit | 0 | No deficit | 0 |
| 6 | 68 | F | N | ACoA | 10 | Normal | Mismatch (prolonged TTD frontal) | Normal | Missing | Delayed venous congestion with bleeding | Memory deficit | 2 | Memory/cognitive deficit | 2 | Memory deficit | 2 |
| 7 | 66 | F | N | ICA | 6.7 | Impaired | Mismatch (frontal) | Normal | Missing | Cortical diffusion restriction right frontal lobe | Seizures | 1 | No deficit | 0 | No deficit | 0 |
| 8 | 55 | F | N | MCA | 6 | Impaired | Mismatch (frontal) | Normal | Normal | Ischemia right corona radiata | Severe hemiparesis | 4 | Slight hemiparesis | 2 | Slight hemiparesis | 2 |
| 9 | 53 | F | N | ICA | 10 | Impaired | Mismatch (prolonged MTT + TTD temporal) | Normal | Normal | ACI occlusion, but good collateralization | Slight hemiparesis | 3 | No deficit | 0 | No deficit | 0 |
| Mismatch in iCTP leading to clip repositioning and a second iCTP with improved perfusion | ||||||||||||||||
| 10 | 61 | M | N | MCA | 26 | Impaired | Mismatch (frontal) | Normal | Normal | Ischemia frontal operculum | Aphasia | 3 | Aphasia improved | 2 | Minimal speech impairment | 1 |
| Improved | Normal | |||||||||||||||
| 11 | 71 | F | Y | ACoA | 7 | Impaired | Mismatch (frontal) | Normal | Impaired | No ischemia in both Acom territories | GCS3 | 5 | GCS3 | 5 | GCS8 | 4 |
| Improved | Normal | |||||||||||||||
Fig. 3A 61-year-old male patient presented with a partially thrombosed and calcified left-sided giant MCA aneurysm (e). After clipping, iCTA showed a reduced contrast enhancement in one M2 branch in close vicinity of the clip (a). iCTP showed a mismatch by means of an increased MTT in the frontal M2 vessel territory (c). Therefore, the clip was repositioned, and a second iCTA showed normal vessel enhancement (b), and a second iCTP showed normal MTT compared to the contralateral side (d). Postoperative angiography showed a complete occlusion of the aneurysm (f). The patient presented with a transient aphasia during the early postoperative course that almost completely resolved until last FU
Fig. 4Outcome scales according to the modified Rankin scale (mRS) immediately postoperatively (within 6 h after operation), at discharge and at last FU
Uni- and multivariate analysis for postoperative outcome and outcome at last follow-up
| Outcome postoperatively | Outcome at last FU | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR/95% CI | OR/95% CI | |||
| Univariate analysis | ||||
| Age (continuously) | < 0.03 | 1.070/1.008 to 1.136 | NS ( | |
| Age (< 50 vs. ≥ 50 years) | NS ( | NS ( | ||
| Gender (male vs. female) | NS ( | NS ( | ||
| Side (right vs. left) | < 0.05 | 0.183/0.034 to 0.979 | NS ( | |
| Aneurysm size (< 5 mm vs. ≥ 5 mm) | NS ( | NS ( | ||
| Aneurysm size (continuously) | < 0.019 | 1.514/1.071 to 2.139 | NS ( | |
| Aneurysm location | NS ( | NS ( | ||
| iCTP mismatch | < 0.001 | 0.030/0.006 to 0.144 | < 0.035 | 0.178/0.036 to 0.886 |
| IOM | NA* | NA* | ||
| Temporary clipping (yes/no) | NS ( | < 0.002 | 0.078/0.015 to 0.392 | |
| Temporary clipping time | NS ( | NS ( | ||
| Multiple aneurysms | NS ( | NS ( | ||
| Multivariate analysis | ||||
| iCTP mismatch | < 0.001 | 0.012/0.001 to 0.128 | ||
| Temporary clipping | < 0.002 | 0.078/0.015 to 0.392 | ||
*No significant results according to low number of cases
FU follow-up, iCTP intraoperative CT perfusion, IOM intraoperative monitoring, NS not statistically significant, NA not available, OR odds ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval
Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, FN, FP, and accuracy for the detection of an immediate postoperative neurological deficit by iCTP, iCTA, and IONM
| Parameter | Sens [%] | Spec [%] | PPV [%] | NPV [%] | FN [%] | FP [%] | Accuracy [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| iCTP | 63.6 | 100 | 100 | 95.3 | 36.4 | 0 | 95.7 |
| iCTA | 45.5 | 100 | 100 | 93.2 | 54.5 | 0 | 93.5 |
| IONM | 18.2 | 83.3 | 100 | 85.9 | 81.8 | 0 | 86.4 |
iCTP intraoperative CT perfusion, iCTA intraoperative CT angiography, IONM intraoperative monitoring, Sens sensitivity, Spec specificity, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, FN false negative, FP false positive