Shunichiro Tsukamoto1, Naohito Okami1, Takayuki Yamada1,2, Kengo Azushima1, Takahiro Yamaji1,3, Sho Kinguchi1, Kazushi Uneda1,4, Tomohiko Kanaoka1, Hiromichi Wakui5, Kouichi Tamura6. 1. Department of Medical Science and Cardiorenal Medicine, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan. 2. Renal-Electrolyte Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 3. Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disorders Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore. 4. Department of Kampo Medicine, Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Aizuwakamatsu, Japan. 5. Department of Medical Science and Cardiorenal Medicine, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan. hiro1234@yokohama-cu.ac.jp. 6. Department of Medical Science and Cardiorenal Medicine, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan. tamukou@med.yokohama-cu.ac.jp.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Several previous studies have suggested that uric acid-lowering therapy (ULT) can slow the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Although crucial for CKD patients, few studies have evaluated the effects of different ULT medications on kidney function. This systematic review summarizes evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the effects of ULT on kidney function. METHOD: We performed a systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library up to September 2021 to identify RCTs in CKD patients comparing the effects of ULT on kidney function with other ULT medications or placebo. A network meta-analysis was performed to compare each ULT indirectly. The primary outcome was a change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline. RESULTS: Ten studies were selected with a total of 1480 patients. Topiroxostat significantly improved eGFR and reduced the urinary albumin/creatinine ratio compared to placebo (mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.49 [0.08; 2.90], P = 0.038 and 25.65% [13.25; 38.04], P < 0.001, respectively). Although febuxostat did not show a positive effect overall, it significantly improved renal function (i.e., eGFR) in a subgroup of CKD patients with hyperuricemia (MD [95% CI]: 0.85 [0.02; 1.67], P = 0.045). Allopurinol and pegloticase did not show beneficial effects. CONCLUSIONS: Topiroxostat and febuxostat may have better renoprotective effects in CKD patients than other ULT medications. Further large-scale, long-term studies are required to determine whether these effects will lead, ultimately, to reductions in dialysis induction and major adverse cardiovascular events. Key Points • This study is the first network meta-analysis comparing the nephroprotective effects of ULT in CKD patients. • Topiroxostat and febuxostat showed better renoprotective effects in CKD patients than other ULT medications. • Heterogeneity was low in this study, suggesting consistency of results.
INTRODUCTION: Several previous studies have suggested that uric acid-lowering therapy (ULT) can slow the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Although crucial for CKD patients, few studies have evaluated the effects of different ULT medications on kidney function. This systematic review summarizes evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the effects of ULT on kidney function. METHOD: We performed a systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library up to September 2021 to identify RCTs in CKD patients comparing the effects of ULT on kidney function with other ULT medications or placebo. A network meta-analysis was performed to compare each ULT indirectly. The primary outcome was a change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline. RESULTS: Ten studies were selected with a total of 1480 patients. Topiroxostat significantly improved eGFR and reduced the urinary albumin/creatinine ratio compared to placebo (mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.49 [0.08; 2.90], P = 0.038 and 25.65% [13.25; 38.04], P < 0.001, respectively). Although febuxostat did not show a positive effect overall, it significantly improved renal function (i.e., eGFR) in a subgroup of CKD patients with hyperuricemia (MD [95% CI]: 0.85 [0.02; 1.67], P = 0.045). Allopurinol and pegloticase did not show beneficial effects. CONCLUSIONS: Topiroxostat and febuxostat may have better renoprotective effects in CKD patients than other ULT medications. Further large-scale, long-term studies are required to determine whether these effects will lead, ultimately, to reductions in dialysis induction and major adverse cardiovascular events. Key Points • This study is the first network meta-analysis comparing the nephroprotective effects of ULT in CKD patients. • Topiroxostat and febuxostat showed better renoprotective effects in CKD patients than other ULT medications. • Heterogeneity was low in this study, suggesting consistency of results.