Literature DB >> 34642791

Changes in quality of life and lower urinary tract symptoms over time in cancer patients after a total prostatectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Koji Amano1,2, Kumi Suzuki3, Yuri Ito4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to clarify associations between and changes over time in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and quality of life (QOL) in cancer patients after a total prostatectomy.
METHODS: The subjects were cancer patients who had undergone total prostatectomy and had participated in non-randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, or case-control studies with outcomes of changes over time in LUTS or QOL. Fourteen studies were included for systematic review and meta-analysis.
RESULTS: Compared to preoperatively, the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)-a LUTS indicator-yielded the following, 3 months after operation (MD [95% confidence interval, CI] = -0.27 [-2.22 to 1.68], p = .7855), 6 months after operation (MD [95% CI] = -2.12 [-3.04 to -1.20], p < .0001), and 12 months after operation (MD [95% CI] = -2.27 [-2.63 to -1.92], p < .0001), demonstrating significant decrease and, therefore, improvement of symptoms after 6 months. International Prostate Symptom Score-Quality of Life (IPSS-QOL), a QOL indicator, was significantly reduced at 12 months after surgery, indicating improved QOL (MD [95% CI] = -0.49 [-0.87 to -0.11], p = .0107), but there was heterogeneity between different studies (I2 = 89.19%). A cumulative meta-analysis showed a tendency for greater improvements in IPSS-QOL at 12 months after surgery, the older the mean age and the higher the mean pre-surgery IPSS. Factors of age, prostate volume, and pre-surgery IPSS were related to postoperative LUTS; exacerbation of both urinary incontinence and urinary tract obstruction was related to QOL.
CONCLUSION: While LUTS improves over time after total prostatectomy, it takes 6 to 12 months after surgery. As there is an association between LUTS and QOL, support to promote self-management of LUTS is important.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS); Meta-analysis; Prostate cancer; Prostatectomy; Quality of life (QOL); Systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34642791     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06595-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.359


  40 in total

1.  Timing of Urinary Pad Exchanges Was the Most Important Factor Affecting Quality of Life in the Early Postoperative Period After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Haga; Tomohiko Yanagida; Michihiro Yabe; Hidenori Akaihata; Junya Hata; Yuichi Sato; Soichiro Ogawa; Kei Ishibashi; Yoshiyuki Kojima
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a patient centered analysis and implications for preoperative counseling.

Authors:  Aaron D Martin; Leah Y Nakamura; Rafael N Nunez; Christopher E Wolter; Mitchell R Humphreys; Erik P Castle
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara; Raymond C Rosen; Walter Artibani; Peter R Carroll; Anthony Costello; Mani Menon; Francesco Montorsi; Vipul R Patel; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Henk Van der Poel; Timothy G Wilson; Filiberto Zattoni; Alexandre Mottrie
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Investigating Urinary Conditions Prior to Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Search of a Desirable Method for Evaluating Post-prostatectomy Incontinence.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Kadono; Takahiro Nohara; Suguru Kadomoto; Kazufumi Nakashima; Masashi Iijima; Kazuyoshi Shigehara; Kazutaka Narimoto; Kouji Izumi; Atsushi Mizokami
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.480

5.  Incidence of complications other than urinary incontinence or erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Robert K Nam; Patrick Cheung; Sender Herschorn; Refik Saskin; Jiandong Su; Laurence H Klotz; Michelle Chang; Girish S Kulkarni; Yuna Lee; Ronald T Kodama; Steven A Narod
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 6.  Men's experiences after prostatectomy: A meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Eun-Hi Kong; Janet A Deatrick; Christine K Bradway
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2017-07-23       Impact factor: 5.837

7.  Incontinence after prostatectomy: coping with incontinence after prostate cancer surgery.

Authors:  Mary H Palmer; Linda A Fogarty; Mark R Somerfield; Lorrie L Powel
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.172

8.  Patients' perceptions of radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Sophia Eilat-Tsanani; Hava Tabenkin; Joseph Shental; Irit Elmalah; Dov Steinmetz
Journal:  Isr Med Assoc J       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 0.892

9.  De novo overactive bladder after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Matsukawa; Yashushi Yoshino; Shohei Ishida; Takashi Fujita; Tsuyoshi Majima; Yasuhito Funahashi; Naoto Sassa; Masashi Kato; Momokazu Gotoh
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 2.696

10.  Men's experiences of regaining urinary continence following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) for localised prostate cancer: a qualitative phenomenological study.

Authors:  Jo Waller; Natalie Pattison
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.036

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.