S Kierkegaard1,2, I Mechlenburg3,4, U Dalgas5, B Lund6, K Søballe3, H Sørensen5. 1. H-Hip, Department of Physio and Occupational Therapy and Orthopaedic Surgery, Horsens Hospital, Sundvej 30C, 8700, Horsens, Denmark. signekierkegaard@hotmail.com. 2. Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark. signekierkegaard@hotmail.com. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark. 4. Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark. 5. Section for Sports Science, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark. 6. H-Hip, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Horsens Hospital, 8700, Horsens, Denmark.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) experience decreased function. Consequently, earlier studies have evaluated gait biomechanics in these patients, but a larger study evaluating gait biomechanics before and after an intervention standardising gait speed is lacking. We aimed at investigating gait kinematics and kinetics in patients with FAIS compared with pain-free controls before and 1 year after hip arthroscopic surgery. Secondary, we aimed at analysing gait pattern separately for the sexes and to investigate associations between peak kinematics and kinetics and the Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty patients with FAIS and 30 pain-free controls were tested at a standardised gait speed (1.40 m/s ± 10%). Patients were tested twice: before and 1 year after surgery. Kinematics and kinetics were recorded using infrared high-speed cameras and a force plate. Participants answered HAGOS. RESULTS: The largest difference among groups was that gait differed between males and females. Neither before nor after surgery could we demonstrate large alterations in gait pattern between patients and pain-free controls. Male patients demonstrated associations between peak kinematics and kinetics and HAGOS Sports function. CONCLUSIONS: Gait pattern was only vaguely altered in patients with FAIS compared with pain-free controls before and after surgery when using at standardised gait speed. Hence, analysing gait in patients with FAIS does not seem of major importance. Nevertheless, there was an association between HAGOS Sports function and peak kinematics and kinetics in male patients, implying that there could be a clinical importance.
INTRODUCTION: Patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) experience decreased function. Consequently, earlier studies have evaluated gait biomechanics in these patients, but a larger study evaluating gait biomechanics before and after an intervention standardising gait speed is lacking. We aimed at investigating gait kinematics and kinetics in patients with FAIS compared with pain-free controls before and 1 year after hip arthroscopic surgery. Secondary, we aimed at analysing gait pattern separately for the sexes and to investigate associations between peak kinematics and kinetics and the Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty patients with FAIS and 30 pain-free controls were tested at a standardised gait speed (1.40 m/s ± 10%). Patients were tested twice: before and 1 year after surgery. Kinematics and kinetics were recorded using infrared high-speed cameras and a force plate. Participants answered HAGOS. RESULTS: The largest difference among groups was that gait differed between males and females. Neither before nor after surgery could we demonstrate large alterations in gait pattern between patients and pain-free controls. Male patients demonstrated associations between peak kinematics and kinetics and HAGOS Sports function. CONCLUSIONS: Gait pattern was only vaguely altered in patients with FAIS compared with pain-free controls before and after surgery when using at standardised gait speed. Hence, analysing gait in patients with FAIS does not seem of major importance. Nevertheless, there was an association between HAGOS Sports function and peak kinematics and kinetics in male patients, implying that there could be a clinical importance.
Authors: Rintje Agricola; Marinus P Heijboer; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra; Jan A N Verhaar; Harrie Weinans; Jan H Waarsing Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2012-06-23 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Matthew G King; Peter R Lawrenson; Adam I Semciw; Kane J Middleton; Kay M Crossley Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2018-02-13 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Bryan T Kelly; Asheesh Bedi; Catherine M Robertson; Katrina Dela Torre; M Russell Giveans; Christopher M Larson Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2012-03-05 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Matthew D Freke; Joanne Kemp; Ida Svege; May Arna Risberg; Adam Semciw; Kay M Crossley Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2016-06-14 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Florian D Naal; Hermes H Miozzari; Michael Schär; Tobias Hesper; Hubert P Nötzli Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 6.202