Literature DB >> 34637586

Anaerobic soil disinfestation, amendment-type, and irrigation regimen influence Salmonella survival and die-off in agricultural soils.

Claire M Murphy1, Daniel L Weller2, Mark S Reiter3, Cameron A Bardsley1, Joseph Eifert1, Monica Ponder1, Steve L Rideout4, Laura K Strawn1.   

Abstract

AIMS: This study investigated Salmonella concentrations following combinations of horticultural practices including anaerobic soil disinfestation (ASD), soil amendment type and irrigation regimen. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Sandy-loam soil was inoculated with a five-serovar Salmonella cocktail (5.5 ± 0.2 log CFU per gram) and subjected to one of six treatments: (i) no soil amendment, ASD (ASD control), (ii) no soil amendment, no-ASD (non-ASD control) and (iii-vi) soil amended with pelletized poultry litter, rye, rapeseed or hairy vetch with ASD. The effect of irrigation regimen was determined by collecting samples 3 and 7 days after irrigation. Twenty-five-gram soil samples were collected pre-ASD, post-soil saturation (i.e. ASD-process), and at 14 time-points post-ASD, and Salmonella levels enumerated. Log-linear models examined the effect of amendment type and irrigation regimen on Salmonella die-off during and post-ASD. During ASD, Salmonella concentrations significantly decreased in all treatments (range: -0.2 to -2.7 log CFU per gram), albeit the smallest decrease (-0.2 log CFU per gram observed in the pelletized poultry litter) was of negligible magnitude. Salmonella die-off rates varied by amendment with an average post-ASD rate of -0.05 log CFU per gram day (CI = -0.05, -0.04). Salmonella concentrations remained highest over the 42 days post-ASD in pelletized poultry litter, followed by rapeseed, and hairy vetch treatments. Findings suggested ASD was not able to eliminate Salmonella in soil, and certain soil amendments facilitated enhanced Salmonella survival. Salmonella serovar distribution differed by treatment with pelletized poultry litter supporting S. Newport survival, compared with other serovars. Irrigation appeared to assist Salmonella survival with concentrations being 0.14 log CFU per gram (CI = 0.05, 0.23) greater 3 days, compared with 7 days post-irrigation.
CONCLUSIONS: ASD does not eliminate Salmonella in soil, and may in fact, depending on the soil amendment used, facilitate Salmonella survival. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Synergistic and antagonistic effects on food safety hazards of implementing horticultural practices should be considered.
© 2021 Society for Applied Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Salmonellazzm321990; anaerobic soil disinfection; die-off; fumigation; horticulture; irrigation; preharvest; soil amendment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34637586      PMCID: PMC8860855          DOI: 10.1111/jam.15324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  45 in total

1.  Survival of Salmonella enteritidis and Salmonella typhimurium in chicken manure at different levels of water activity.

Authors:  S Himathongkham; S Nuanualsuwan; H Riemann
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  Occurrence and antibiotic resistance of multiple Salmonella serotypes recovered from water, sediment and soil on mid-Atlantic tomato farms.

Authors:  Shirley A Micallef; Rachel E Rosenberg Goldstein; Ashish George; Lara Kleinfelter; Marc S Boyer; Cristina R McLaughlin; Andrew Estrin; Laura Ewing; Junia Jean-Gilles Beaubrun; Darcy E Hanes; Mahendra H Kothary; Ben D Tall; Jafar H Razeq; Sam W Joseph; Amy R Sapkota
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 6.498

3.  Influence of aerobic and anaerobic conditions on survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in Luria-Bertani broth, farm-yard manure and slurry.

Authors:  Alexander V Semenov; Leo van Overbeek; Aad J Termorshuizen; Ariena H C van Bruggen
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 6.789

4.  Salmonella survival in manure-treated soils during simulated seasonal temperature exposure.

Authors:  Richard A Holley; Katia M Arrus; Kimberly H Ominski; Mario Tenuta; Gregory Blank
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 2.751

5.  Microbial Quality of Agricultural Water Used in Produce Preharvest Production on the Eastern Shore of Virginia.

Authors:  Laura N Truitt; Kathleen M Vazquez; Rachel C Pfuntner; Steven L Rideout; Arie H Havelaar; Laura K Strawn
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.077

6.  Comparison of typing methods with a new procedure based on sequence characterization for Salmonella serovar prediction.

Authors:  Matthew L Ranieri; Chunlei Shi; Andrea I Moreno Switt; Henk C den Bakker; Martin Wiedmann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Assessing the impacts of temperature and storage on Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and L. monocytogenes decay in dairy manure.

Authors:  Sagor Biswas; Pramod K Pandey; Thomas B Farver
Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 3.210

8.  Prevalence, distribution, and diversity of Salmonella enterica in a major produce region of California.

Authors:  Lisa Gorski; Craig T Parker; Anita Liang; Michael B Cooley; Michele T Jay-Russell; Andrew G Gordus; E Robert Atwill; Robert E Mandrell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Characterization of Listeria monocytogenes and Listeria innocua from a vegetable processing plant by RAPD and REA.

Authors:  V Aguado; A I Vitas; I García-Jalón
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 5.277

10.  Web-based surveillance and global Salmonella distribution, 2000-2002.

Authors:  Eleni Galanis; Danilo M A Lo Fo Wong; Mary E Patrick; Norma Binsztein; Anna Cieslik; Thongchai Chalermchikit; Awa Aidara-Kane; Andrea Ellis; Frederick J Angulo; Henrik C Wegener
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.