| Literature DB >> 34637119 |
E Rusyan1, E Grabowska2, I Strużycka3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of erosive tooth wear (ETW) and risk indicators in the population of adolescents aged 15 in Poland.Entities:
Keywords: Basic Erosive Wear Examination (BEWE); Epidemiologic studies; Erosive tooth wear (ETW); Risk factors
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34637119 PMCID: PMC8994734 DOI: 10.1007/s40368-021-00670-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Arch Paediatr Dent ISSN: 1818-6300
Fig.1Severe erosive tooth wear on the facial surfaces of anterior teeth. Age of patients: 15 years
Fig. 2A 15-year-old adolescent with severe erosive lesions affecting the permanent molars
Fig. 3The plaster model of a patient with eating disorders, advanced erosive tooth wear
General characteristics of the study group
| Gender | Male: 1271 (48.2%) |
|---|---|
| Place of residence | Urban area: 1542 (58.4%) Rural area: 1097 (41.6%) |
| Education level of the mother | Primary: 109 (4.1%) Secondary: 1715 (65.0%) University: 556 (21.1%) Missing data: 259 (9.8%) |
| Education level of the father | Primary: 116 (4.4%) Secondary: 1823 (69.1%) University: 374 (14.2%) Missing data: 326 (12.4%) |
| Working status of the mother | Full-time job: 1588 (60.2%) Part-time job: 287 (10.9%) Unemployed: 557 (21.1%) Missing data: 207 (7.8%) |
| Working status of the father | Full-time job: 1860 (70.5%) Part-time job: 269 (10.2%) Unemployed: 232 (8.8%) Missing data: 278 (10.5%) |
| Systemic health | Gastroesophageal reflux: 475 (18.4%) Eating disorders: 95 (3.7%) Allergies: 20 (0.8%) Asthma: 11 (0.4%) |
| Toothbrush type | Manual, soft: 145 (5.5%) Manual, medium: 1672 (63.4%) Manual, hard: 438 (16.6%) Electric: 256 (9.7%) No toothbrush and/or missing data: 360 (13.6%) |
| Time between meal and toothbrushing | Median: 5 min Mean: 16 min, SD = 37 min |
| Fluoride rinse or gel | 1757 (66.6%) |
| Tooth sensitivity | 613 (23.2%) |
The maximum values of the BEWE index in persons aged 15
| BEWE = 0 | BEWE = 1 | BEWE = 2 | BEWE = 3 | Spearman rank correlation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 1997 75.7% | 563 21.3% | 74 2.8% | 5 0.2% | – |
| Anterior teeth | 2158 81.8% | 433 16.4% | 44 1.7% | 4 0.2% | |
| Posterior teeth | 2373 89.9% | 231 8.8% | 34 1.3% | 1 < 0.1% |
Significance level *p < 0.05
Prevalence of ETW, depending on the presence of potential risk factors
| General erosive lesions prevalence (BEWE ≥ 1) | OR (95% CI) | Moderate or severe erosive lesions prevalence (BEWE ≥ 2) | OR (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Place of residence | Urban area | 23.7% | Ref | 3.1% | Ref |
| Rural area | 25.3% | 1.09 (0.91–1.30) | 2.8% | 0.91 (0.57–1.43) | |
| Gender | Male | 26.2% | 1.22 (1.02–1.45) | 3.8% | 1.69 (1.07–2.68) |
| Female | 22.6% | ref | 2.3% | ref | |
| Girls, depending on the place of residence | Urban area | 21.3% | ref | 2.2% | ref |
| Rural area | 24.5% | 1.19 (0.92–1.54) | 2.4% | 1.07 (0.52–2.20) | |
| Boys, depending on the place of residence | Urban area | 26.3% | 1.01 (0.79–1.30) | 4.1% | 1.26 (0.70–2.29) |
| Rural area | 26.1% | Ref | 3.3% | Ref | |
| Education level of the mother | Primary | 26.6% | 1.08 (0.70–1.67) | 1.8% | 0.55 (0.13–2.30) |
| Secondary | 25.1% | Ref | 3.3% | Ref | |
| University | 22.7% | 0.87 (0.70–1.09) | 2.5% | 0.77 (0.42–1.39) | |
| Education level of the father | Primary | 22.4% | 0.86 (0.55–1.35) | 3.4% | 1.13 (0.40–3.16) |
| Secondary | 25.1% | Ref | 3.1% | Ref | |
| University | 21.7% | 0.83 (0.63–1.08) | 2.9% | 0.96 (0.50–1.84) | |
| Working status of the mother | Full-time job | 25.7% | Ref | 3.4% | Ref |
| Part-time job | 26.8% | 1.06 (0.77–1.47) | 6.3% | 1.89 (0.98–3.67) | |
| Unemployed | 23.9% | 0.91 (0.73–1.14) | 2.5% | 0.73 (0.42–1.27) | |
| Working status of the father | Full-time job | 19.0% | Ref | 4.3% | Ref |
| Part-time job | 25.3% | 1.45 (0.94–2.22) | 3.3% | 0.77 (0.31–1.92) | |
| Unemployed | 24.7% | 1.40 (0.99–1.98) P = 0.06 | 3.0% | 0.69 (0.35–1.37) P = 0.29 | |
| Systemic health | Gastroesophageal reflux | 23.8% | 0.94 (0.74–1.19) | 3.4% | 1.13 (0.65–1.97) |
| Eating disorders | 18.9% | 0.70 (0.42–1.18) | 2.1% | 0.67 (0.16–2.78) | |
| Allergies | 20.0% | 0.76 (0.25–2.28) | 5.0% | 1.67 (0.22–12.65) | |
| Asthma | 9.1% | 0.30 (0.04–2.38) | 0 | – | |
| Toothbrush type | Manual, soft | 27.6% | 1.17 (0.80–1.72) | 3.4% | 1.09 (0.43–2.77) |
| Manual, medium | 24.5% | Ref | 3.2% | Ref | |
| Manual, hard | 24.7% | 1.01 (0.79–1.29) | 3.0% | 0.93 (0.50–1.73) | |
| Electric | 27.0% | 1.14 (0.84–1.53) | 3.1% | 0.99 (0.46–2.10) | |
| Time between meal and toothbrushing | ≤ 5 min | 24.4% | 0.96 (0.80–1.15) | 3.0% | 0.92 (0.58–1.44) P = 0,71 |
| > 5 min | 25.2% | Ref | 3.2% | Ref | |
| Fluoride rinse or gel | Yes | 25.1% | 1.03 (0.85–1.25) | 2.7% | 0.82 (0.50–1.35) |
| No | 24.5% | Ref | 3.2% | Ref | |
| Tooth sensitivity | Yes | 26.3% | 1.09 (0.89–1.35) | 4.9% | 1.99 (1.25–3.17) |
| No | 24.6% | Ref | 2.5% | Ref | |
ref. reference level, significance level *p < 0.05
Consumption of acidic foods and drinks in the study group
| Daily | ≥ 3 times a day | ≥ 6 times a day | Comparison (girls vs boys, Mann–Whitney test) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption of acidic foods and drinks | Fruits | 1958 (74.2%) | 471 (17.8%) | 80 (3.0%) | |
| Fruit juices | 1702 (64.4%) | 662 (25.1%) | 171 (6.5%) | ||
| Fruit teas | 1318 (49.9%) | 402 (15.2%) | 95 (3.6%) | ||
| Isotonic drinks | 282 (10.7%) | 115 (4.4%) | 42 (1.6%) | ||
| Carbonated drinks | 996 (37.7%) | 336 (12.7%) | 118 (4.5%) | ||
| Energy drinks | 225 (8.5%) | 91 (3.4%) | 30 (1.1%) | ||
| Marinades | 128 (4.9%) | 43 (1.6%) | 22 (0.8%) | ||
Significance level *p < 0.05
The correlation between the severity of ETW and the frequency of acidic foods or beverages consumption
| Acidic foods and beverages | Spearman rank correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| Erosive lesions in anterior teeth | Erosive lesions in posterior teeth | |
| Fruits | ||
| Fruit juices | ||
| Fruit teas | ||
| Isotonic drinks | ||
| Carbonated drinks | ||
| Energy drinks | ||
| Marinades | ||
Significance level *p < 0.05
Health awareness related to ETW in the study group
| Distribution of answers in the study group | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| True | False | I don’t know | ||
| Health awareness related to tooth erosion | Erosion is caused by acids | 470 (17.8%) | 409 (15.5%) | 1760 (66.7%) |
| Fruits and fruit juices dissolve teeth | 322 (12.2%) | 1341 (50.8%) | 976 (37.0%) | |
| Hard brushes and abrasive toothbrushes can damage teeth | 1380 (52.3%) | 313 (11.9%) | 946 (35.8%) | |
The association between the prevalence of erosive lesions and the health awareness
| Erosive lesions in anterior teeth | OR (95% CI) | Erosive lesions in posterior teeth | OR (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erosion is caused by acids | True | 17.4% | 0.94 (0.72–1.22) | 11.1% | 0.79 (0.58–1.08) |
| False/I don’t know | 18.4% | Ref | 13.6% | Ref | |
| Fruits and fruit juices dissolve teeth | True | 18.3% | 1.01 (0.75–1.36) | 13.4% | 1.02 (0.72–1.44) |
| False/I don’t know | 18.2% | Ref | 13.1% | Ref | |
| Hard brushes and abrasive toothbrushes can damage teeth | True | 19.1% | 1.12 (0.92–1.37) | 13.4% | 1.05 (0.84–1.31) |
| False/I don’t know | 17.3% | Ref | 12.9% | Ref | |
ref. reference level