Literature DB >> 34637055

Erbium, chromium-doped: yttrium, scandium, gallium, garnet and diode lasers in the treatment of peri-implantitis: clinical and biochemical outcomes in a randomized-controlled clinical trial.

Nazli Zeynep Alpaslan Yayli1, Ahmet Cemil Talmac2, Serap Keskin Tunc3, Damla Akbal2, Dicle Altindal2, Abdullah Seckin Ertugrul4.   

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the effects of 940 nm diode laser and 2780 nm erbium, chromium-doped: yttrium, scandium, gallium, garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser used in addition to mechanical therapy in the non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis on clinical parameters and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) levels in the peri-implant crevicular fluid. A total of 50 patients with peri-implantitis were randomized into three groups to receive peri-implant treatment. The control group (n = 17) only received conventional non-surgical mechanical therapy. The trial groups [(diode group (n = 16) and Er,Cr:YSGG group (n = 17)] received dental laser in addition to mechanical therapy. Gingival index (GI), plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing, probing depth (PD), MMP-9, and TIMP-1 levels were assessed at baseline (T0) and at 6 months after treatment (T1). The GI, PI, and PD significantly decreased in all groups at T1, compared to T0 (p < 0.05). The decrease in the PD was similar between the control and diode groups with Er,Cr:YSGG providing more reduction (1.16 ± 0.64 mm) than either method (p = 0.032). A significant intra-group decrease in MMP-9 level was only observed in the Er,Cr:YSGG group (p = 0.009). The decrease in TIMP-1 level from T0 to T1 was similar between the control and the diode groups (p > 0.05) and it was significantly lower than the decrease in the Er,Cr:YSGG group (p < 0.05). Addition of diode laser to non-surgical mechanical therapy does not provide any additional benefit for treatment outcomes. The Er,Cr:YSGG laser seems to be more efficient both at clinical and molecular levels. ClinicalTrials, ID: NCT04730687. Registered 13 April 2021. Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04730687.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diode; Er,Cr:YSGG; Laser therapy; MMP-9; Peri-implantitis; TIMP-1

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34637055     DOI: 10.1007/s10103-021-03436-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


  30 in total

Review 1.  Current status of clinical laser applications in periodontal therapy.

Authors:  Akira Aoki; Koji Mizutani; Aristeo Atsushi Takasaki; Katia Miyuki Sasaki; Shigeyuki Nagai; Frank Schwarz; Itaru Yoshida; Toru Eguro; Jorge Luis Zeredo; Yuichi Izumi
Journal:  Gen Dent       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec

Review 2.  Effect of photodynamic and laser therapy in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis: A systematic review.

Authors:  Abdulaziz M Albaker; Aws S ArRejaie; Mohammed Alrabiah; Tariq Abduljabbar
Journal:  Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.631

Review 3.  Decision Making for Management of Periimplant Diseases.

Authors:  Khaled Sinjab; Carlos Garaicoa-Pazmino; Hom-Lay Wang
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.454

Review 4.  Host response and peri-implantitis.

Authors:  Monica Grazieli Corrêa; Suzana Peres Pimentel; Fernanda Vieira Ribeiro; Fabiano Ribeiro Cirano; Marcio Zaffalon Casati
Journal:  Braz Oral Res       Date:  2019-09-30

5.  A comparative evaluation of the efficacy of diode laser as an adjunct to mechanical debridement versus conventional mechanical debridement in periodontal flap surgery: a clinical and microbiological study.

Authors:  Sneha R Gokhale; Ashvini M Padhye; Girish Byakod; Sanjay A Jain; Vikram Padbidri; Sumanth Shivaswamy
Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Peri-implant versus periodontal wound healing.

Authors:  Pinar Emecen-Huja; Tim D Eubank; Vladimir Shapiro; Vedat Yildiz; Dimitris N Tatakis; Binnaz Leblebicioglu
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 8.728

7.  Effectiveness of 980-mm diode and 1064-nm extra-long-pulse neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet lasers in implant disinfection.

Authors:  Fábio Gonçalves; Artemio Luiz Zanetti; Raquel Virgínia Zanetti; Francesco Savério Martelli; Mario Júlio Avila-Campos; Luiz Fernando Tomazinho; José Mauro Granjeiro
Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 8.  Clinical outcomes of using lasers for peri-implantitis surface detoxification: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  James Mailoa; Guo-Hao Lin; Hsun-Liang Chan; Mark MacEachern; Hom-Lay Wang
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 6.993

9.  Efficacy of Er:YAG Laser in the Decontamination of Peri-implant Disease: A One-Year Prospective Closed Cohort Study.

Authors:  Michael R Norton
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Adjunctive efficacy of diode laser in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis with mechanical therapy: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mario Aimetti; Giulia Maria Mariani; Francesco Ferrarotti; Elena Ercoli; Chun Ching Liu; Federica Romano
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 5.977

View more
  1 in total

1.  Non-surgical mechanical therapy of peri-implantitis with or without repeated adjunctive diode laser application. A 6-month double-blinded randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Andrea Roccuzzo; Sabrina Klossner; Alexandra Stähli; Jean-Claude Imber; Sigrun Eick; Anton Sculean; Giovanni E Salvi
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2022-07-10       Impact factor: 5.021

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.