Literature DB >> 34636646

Three-Dimensional-Printed External Scaffolds Mitigate Loss of Volume and Topography in Engineered Elastic Cartilage Constructs.

Xue Dong1,2, Ishani D Premaratne1, Jaime L Bernstein1, Arash Samadi1, Alexandra J Lin1, Yoshiko Toyoda1, Jongkil Kim3, Lawrence J Bonassar3,4, Jason A Spector1,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A major obstacle in the clinical translation of engineered auricular scaffolds is the significant contraction and loss of topography that occur during maturation of the soft collagen-chondrocyte matrix into elastic cartilage. We hypothesized that 3-dimensional-printed, biocompatible scaffolds would "protect" maturing hydrogel constructs from contraction and loss of topography.
DESIGN: External disc-shaped and "ridged" scaffolds were designed and 3D-printed using polylactic acid (PLA). Acellular type I collagen constructs were cultured in vitro for up to 3 months. Collagen constructs seeded with bovine auricular chondrocytes (BAuCs) were prepared in 3 groups and implanted subcutaneously in vivo for 3 months: preformed discs with ("Scaffolded/S") or without ("Naked/N") an external scaffold and discs that were formed within an external scaffold via injection molding ("Injection Molded/SInj").
RESULTS: The presence of an external scaffold or use of injection molding methodology did not affect the acellular construct volume or base area loss. In vivo, the presence of an external scaffold significantly improved preservation of volume and base area at 3 months compared to the naked group (P < 0.05). Construct contraction was mitigated even further in the injection molded group, and topography of the ridged constructs was maintained with greater fidelity (P < 0.05). Histology verified the development of mature auricular cartilage in the constructs within external scaffolds after 3 months.
CONCLUSION: Custom-designed, 3D-printed, biocompatible external scaffolds significantly mitigate BAuC-seeded construct contraction and maintain complex topography. Further refinement and scaling of this approach in conjunction with construct fabrication utilizing injection molding may aid in the development of full-scale auricular scaffolds.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; autologous reconstruction; cartilage tissue engineering; ear; elastic cartilage; external scaffold; microtia

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34636646      PMCID: PMC8804786          DOI: 10.1177/19476035211049556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cartilage        ISSN: 1947-6035            Impact factor:   3.117


  35 in total

1.  Microtia repair.

Authors:  David A Staffenberg
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 2.  The extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction.

Authors:  Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.727

3.  Reconstruction of the burned external ear using a Medpor porous polyethylene pivoting helix framework.

Authors:  T Wellisz
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  A new method of total reconstruction of the auricle for microtia.

Authors:  S Nagata
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Donor-site morbidity after autologous costal cartilage harvest in ear reconstruction and approaches to reducing donor-site contour deformity.

Authors:  Rajan S Uppal; Walid Sabbagh; Jagdip Chana; David T Gault
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Long-Term Morphological and Microarchitectural Stability of Tissue-Engineered, Patient-Specific Auricles In Vivo.

Authors:  Benjamin Peter Cohen; Rachel C Hooper; Jennifer L Puetzer; Rachel Nordberg; Ope Asanbe; Karina A Hernandez; Jason A Spector; Lawrence J Bonassar
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.845

7.  Pursuing Mirror Image Reconstruction in Unilateral Microtia: Customizing Auricular Framework by Application of Three-Dimensional Imaging and Three-Dimensional Printing.

Authors:  Hsin-Yu Chen; Li-Shia Ng; Chun-Shin Chang; Ting-Chen Lu; Ning-Hung Chen; Zung-Chung Chen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 8.  Total reconstruction of the auricle: our experiences on indications and recent techniques.

Authors:  K Storck; R Staudenmaier; M Buchberger; T Strenger; K Kreutzer; A von Bomhard; T Stark
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  In Vitro Regeneration of Patient-specific Ear-shaped Cartilage and Its First Clinical Application for Auricular Reconstruction.

Authors:  Guangdong Zhou; Haiyue Jiang; Zongqi Yin; Yu Liu; Qingguo Zhang; Chen Zhang; Bo Pan; Jiayu Zhou; Xu Zhou; Hengyun Sun; Dan Li; Aijuan He; Zhiyong Zhang; Wenjie Zhang; Wei Liu; Yilin Cao
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 8.143

10.  Tissue engineering the human auricle by auricular chondrocyte-mesenchymal stem cell co-implantation.

Authors:  Benjamin P Cohen; Jaime L Bernstein; Kerry A Morrison; Jason A Spector; Lawrence J Bonassar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Special Features of Polyester-Based Materials for Medical Applications.

Authors:  Raluca Nicoleta Darie-Niță; Maria Râpă; Stanisław Frąckowiak
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 4.329

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.