Literature DB >> 34636433

Impact of Hospital Volume on Outcomes Following Head and Neck Cancer Surgery and Flap Reconstruction.

Josef Madrigal1,2, Laith Mukdad1, Albert Y Han1, Zachary Tran2, Peyman Benharash2, Maie A St John1, Keith E Blackwell1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: Utilization of flaps for reconstruction of large head and neck cancer (HNCA) defects has become more prevalent. The present study aimed to assess the impact of center experience as measured by annual hospital caseload on mortality, major complications, resource utilization, and 90-day readmissions following HNCA resection with flap reconstruction. STUDY
DESIGN: Non-Randomized Controlled Cohort Study.
METHODS: All adult patients undergoing elective HNCA resection with flap reconstruction were identified utilizing the 2010 to 2018 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Hospitals were subsequently classified as low-, medium-, or high-volume based on annual institutional surgical caseload tertiles. Multivariable regression models were implemented to assess the independent association of hospital volume with the outcomes of interest.
RESULTS: Over the nine-year study period, the proportion of HNCA resection with flap reconstruction gradually increased (12.8% in 2010 vs. 17.3% in 2018, P < .001). Although increasing hospital volume did not alter the odds of mortality, patients treated at high-volume centers were less likely to experience both surgical (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.97, P = .025) and medical complications (AOR 0.70, 95% CI 0.57-0.85, P < .001). Furthermore, these patients had shorter hospitalizations (-2.1 days, 95% CI -2.7 to -1.4 days, P < .001) and decreased costs (-$8,100, 95% CI -11,400 to -4,700, P < .001) compared to counterparts at low-volume centers. However, hospital volume did not impact 90-day readmissions.
CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing HNCA resection with flap reconstruction at high-volume centers were less likely to experience surgical and medical complications while incurring shorter hospitalizations and lower costs. Implementation of volume standards may be appropriate to improve outcomes in this surgical population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 132:1381-1387, 2022.
© 2021 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Head and neck; clinical research; reconstructive surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34636433     DOI: 10.1002/lary.29903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  3 in total

1.  Utilization of mechanical prostheses and outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement at safety net hospitals.

Authors:  Samuel T Kim; Zachary Tran; Yu Xia; Vishal Dobaria; Ayesha Ng; Peyman Benharash
Journal:  Surg Open Sci       Date:  2022-04-20

2.  Association of chronic kidney disease with perioperative outcomes following acute lower limb revascularization.

Authors:  Nam Yong Cho; Russyan Mark Mabeza; Cory Lee; Arjun Verma; Josef Madrigal; Joseph Hadaya; Christian de Virgilio; Peyman Benharash
Journal:  Surg Open Sci       Date:  2022-05-11

3.  Influence of center surgical aortic valve volume on outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Matthew Gandjian; Arjun Verma; Zachary Tran; Yas Sanaiha; Peter Downey; Richard J Shemin; Peyman Benharash
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2022-05-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.