| Literature DB >> 34635743 |
Grzegorz Sobieszek1, Radosław Mlak2, Tomasz Powrózek3, Marcin Mazurek3, Aneta Skwarek-Dziekanowska4, Piotr Terlecki5, Teresa Małecka-Massalska3.
Abstract
Cardiac cachexia (CC) is an unfavorable metabolic syndrome leading to exacerbation of chronic heart failure (CHF) and a higher risk of death. The main factor contributing to the development of cachexia is the ongoing inflammatory process mediated by genes (e.g. Integrin Subunit Alpha M-ITGAM). The study aimed to assess the relationship between a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) -323G > A of the ITGAM and the occurrence of nutritional disorders in patients with CHF. 157 CHF patients underwent clinical and nutritional screening. Body composition was evaluated by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Patients with cachexia were characterized by significantly lower weight, body mass index (BMI), lower fat mass (FM), albumin, and hemoglobin. Lower values of BIA parameters: capacitance of membrane (Cm), phase angle (PA), and impedance ratio (Z200/Z5) were noted in women. Those patients demonstrated significantly higher values of creatinine, c-reactive protein (CRP), N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP). A significantly higher risk of cachexia was reported in patients: aged ≥ 74 years (OR 3.55), with renal failure (OR 3.75), New York Heart Association classification (NYHA) III-IV (OR 2.83), with moderate or severe malnutrition according to the score of subjective global assessment (SGA) (OR 19.01) and AA genotype of ITGAM gene (OR 2.03). Determination of the -323G > A SNP in the ITGAM may prove to be a useful marker (after confirmation in further studies and appropriate validation) in the assessment of the risk of nutritional disorders in patients with CHF.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34635743 PMCID: PMC8505625 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-99719-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Characteristics of the study group.
| Variable | Study group (n = 157) | |
|---|---|---|
| Sex | Men | 92 (58.6%) |
| Women | 65 (41.4%) | |
| NYHA (missing data: n = 2) | I | 35 (22.6%) |
| II | 45 (29.0%) | |
| III | 40 (25.8%) | |
| IV | 35 (22.6%) | |
| SGA (missing data: n = 1) | A | 71 (45.5%) |
| B | 70 (44.9%) | |
| C | 15 (9.6%) | |
| Diabetes mellitus (missing data: n = 1) | Yes | 62 (39.7%) |
| No | 94 (60.3%) | |
| Renal failure (missing data: n = 1) | Yes | 59 (37.8%) |
| No | 97 (62.2%) | |
| Smoking (missing data: n = 1) | Current smoker | 67 (42.9%) |
| Ex-smoker | 34 (21.8%) | |
| Non-smoker | 55 (35.3%) | |
Comparison of selected variables depending on the occurrence of the ITGAM genotypes.
| Variable | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA (1) (n = 72) | GA (2) (n = 60) | GG (3) | |||
| Age (years) | 77.0 (39.0.-109.0) | 73.0 (27.0–95.0) | 67.5 (49.0–82.0) | 0.153 | |
| Weight (kg) | 80.0 (48.0–162.0) | 81.0 (42.0–150.0) | 94.0 (75.0–130.0) | 0.047* 2 vs 3; 1 vs 3 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 28.3 (19.5–53.2) | 27.7 (18.7–46.9) | 33.6 (23.0–37.2) | 0.191 | |
| FM (kg) | 24.9 (2.0–68.6) | 22.9. (0.0–65.6) | 32.8 (21.9–43.2) | 0.339 | |
| FFM (kg) | 50.8 (0.0–93.3) | 52.7 (0.0–85.1) | 57.1 (38.1–65.8) | 0.090 | |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 3.4 (1.4–4.6) | 3.6 (1.9–4.6) | 3.6 (2.4–4.0) | 0.311 | |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 91.8 (40.0–349.0) | 84.0 (37.0–369.0) | 165.0 (73.9–241.0) | 0.065 | |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 159.0 (81.0–261.0) | 150.0 (60.0–333.0) | 181.0 (95.0–235.0) | 0.173 | |
| HDL (mg/dL) | 51.1 (7.0–87.0) | 49.0 (9.1–110.0) | 49.0 (11.0–65.4) | 0.404 | |
| LDL (mg/dL) | 83.3 (26.0–178.0) | 71.6 (9.8–217.0) | 107.7 (35.6–149.0) | 0.020* 1 vs 2 | |
| Creatinine(mg/dL) | 1.1 (0.6–2.8) | 1.1 (0.7–2.7) | 1.2 (0.7–3.7) | 0.743 | |
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 13.0(8.0–18.1) | 12.9 (8.8–19.1) | 13.6 (11.9–16.2) | 0.194 | |
| CRP (mg/L) | 4.8 (0.1–123.0) | 8.3 (0.0–117.8) | 3.2 (0.6–56.3) | 0.256 | |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 130.0 (80.0–200.0) | 130.0 (90.0–200.0) | 165.0 (115.0–180.0) | 0.074 | |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 72.5 (40.0–100.0) | 70.0 (45.0–100.0) | 90.0 (70.0–130.0) | 0.026* 2 vs 3; 1 vs 3 | |
| EF% | 41.5 (15.0–65.0) | 45.0 (10.0–65.0) | 45.0 (20.0–60.0) | 0.171 | |
| NT-proBNP (pg/mL) | 3073.5 (138.0–84,919.0) | 2501.0 (285.0–22,534.0) | 3039.5 (639.1–18,628.0) | 0.830 | |
| LVESd (cm) | 4.2 (2.7–6.8) | 4.0 (2.2–7.0) | 4.8 (3.1–7.0) | 0.137 | |
| LVEDd (cm) | 5.3 (3.5–7.5) | 5.2 (3.4–33.0) | 5.6 (4.8–7.8) | 0.135 | |
| LAD (cm) | 4.5 (3.0–6.1) | 4.4 (3.3–5.5) | 4.9 (4.0–5.7) | 0.149 | |
| RVOT (cm) | 3.4 (2.3–4.6) | 3.3 (2.6–5.0) | 3.6 (3.0–6.1) | 0.135 | |
| TAPSE (cm) | 1.9 (0.7–3.0) | 1.9 (0.9–9.0) | 1.9 (1.4–16.0) | 0.800 | |
| PASP (mmHg) | 40.0 (3.4–80.0) | 40.0 (10.0–74.0) | 36.0 (22.0–55.0) | 0.551 | |
| NYHA (missing data: n = 2) | I | 14 (46.7%) | 14 (46.7%) | 2 (6.6%) | 0.784 |
| II | 19 (50.0%) | 17 (44.7%) | 2 (5.3%) | ||
| III | 23 (62.2%) | 13 (35.1%) | 1 (2.7%) | ||
| IV | 15 (45.5%) | 15 (45.5%) | 3 (9.0%) | ||
| SGA (missing data: n = 1) | A | 27 (43.5%) | 29 (46.8%) | 6 (9.7%) | 0.102 |
| B | 34 (54.0%) | 27 (42.9%) | 2 (3.1%) | ||
| C | 11 (78.6%) | 3 (21.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| Diabetes mellitus (missing data: n = 1) | Yes | 37 (64.9%) | 16 (28.1%) | 4 (7.0%) | 0.017* |
| No | 35 (42.7%) | 43 (52.4%) | 4 (4.9%) | ||
| Renal failure (missing data: n = 1) | Yes | 31 (59.6%) | 17 (32.7%) | 4 (7.7%) | 0.184 |
| No | 41 (47.1%) | 42 (48.3%) | 4 (4.6%) | ||
| Smoking (missing data: n = 1) | Current smoker | 30 (52.6%) | 24 (42.1%) | 3 (5.3%) | 0.870 |
| Ex-smoker | 13 (43.3%) | 15 (50%) | 2 (6.7%) | ||
| Non-smoker | 29 (55.8%) | 20 (38.5%) | 3 (5.7%) | ||
| Cm (nF) | Men | 1.4 (0.5–3.6) | 1.0 (0.4–3.6) | 1.1 (0.8–2.0) | 0.377 |
| Women | 1.2 (0.0–2.7) | 0.9 (0.0–3.6) | 0.9 (0.9–0.9) | 0.753 | |
| Pa (o) | Men | 3.2 (1.9–9.6) | 3.8 (1.5–6.6) | 4.8 (4.1–5.1) | 0.227 |
| Women | 3.6 (0.0–6.7) | 4.0 (0.0–6.6) | 3.5 (3.5–3.5) | 0.972 | |
| Z200/Z5 | Men | 1.1 (1.1–1.4) | 1.2 (1.1–1.3) | 1.2 (1.2–1.2) | 0.371 |
| Women | 1.2 (1.1–1.3) | 1.2 (1.1–1.3) | 1.2 (1.1–1.2) | 0.671 | |
*Statistically significant results.
Comparison of selected variables depending on the occurrence of cachexia.
| Variable | Study group (n = 157) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cachectic (n = 74) | Non-cachectic (n = 83) | |||
| Age (years) | 78.5 (70.0–86.0) | 68.5 (59.0–78.0) | < 0.0001* | |
| Weight (kg) | 75.5 (64.8–83.0) | 83.0 (75.0–95.0) | 0.0001* | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.9 (24.2–30.1) | 30.0 (26.4–33.5) | 0.003* | |
| FM (kg) | 22.9 (9.4–34.6) | 26.4 (19.5–32.9) | 0.047* | |
| FFM (kg) | 53.6 (39.2–62.8) | 50.5 (41.8–59.1) | 0.901 | |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 3.0 (2.7–3.4) | 3.7 (3.5–4.0) | < 0.0001* | |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 91.7 (69.0–130.0) | 90.0 (68.0–143.0) | 0.815 | |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 148.2 (118.0–176.0) | 162.0 (128.0–183.0) | 0.258 | |
| HDL (mg/dL) | 45.0 (37.0–60.0) | 49.5 (37.0–63.0) | 0.414 | |
| LDL (mg/dL) | 81.0 (61.8–97.9) | 82.8 (61.6–105.4) | 0.571 | |
| Creatinine(mg/dL) | 1.2 (1.0–1.5) | 1.1 (0.9–1.3) | 0.042* | |
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 12.5 (11.0–14.0) | 13.8 (12.1–14.6) | 0.0020* | |
| CRP (mg/L) | 14.2 (5.1–33.5) | 3.6 (1.6–8.4) | < 0.0001* | |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 130.0 (110.0–140.0) | 130.0 (120.0–150.0) | 0.408 | |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 130.0 (70.0–85.0) | 75.0 (70.0–85.0) | 0.832 | |
| EF% | 40.0 (25.0–52.7) | 45.0 (30.0–55.0) | 0.184 | |
| NT-proBNP (pg/mL) | 4255.5 (1927.0–8015.0) | 1806.0 (1018.0–3333.0) | < 0.0001* | |
| LVESd (cm) | 4.0 (3.6–5.2) | 4.3 (3.8–5.0) | 0.435 | |
| LVEDd (cm) | 5.3 (4.5–6.2) | 5.5 (4.8–6.1) | 0.379 | |
| LAD (cm) | 4.6 (4.0–5.0) | 4.5 (4.0–5.0) | 0.365 | |
| RVOT (cm) | 3.5 (3.1–3.8) | 3.4 (3.1–3.8) | 0.765 | |
| TAPSE (cm) | 1.8 (1.4–2.0) | 1.9 (1.6–2.1) | 0.109 | |
| PASP (mmHg) | 45.0 (35.0–50.5) | 35.0 (30.0–45.0) | 0.003* | |
| Cm (nF) | Men | 1.2 (0.8–1.6) | 1.4 (0.7–2.0) | 0.687 |
| Women | 0.7 (0.0–1.3) | 1.3 (0.9–1.8) | 0.009* | |
| PA (°) | Men | 3.8 (2.7–4.7) | 4.0 (3.1–5.1) | 0.169 |
| Women | 2.8 (0.0–3.6) | 4.2 (3.6–4.8) | 0.004* | |
| Z200/Z5 | Men | 1.2 (1.1–1.2) | 1.2 (1.1–1.2) | 0.169 |
| Women | 1.1 (1.1–1.2) | 1.2 (1.2–1.2) | 0.015* | |
*Statistically significant results.
Risk of the cachexia depending on selected demographic, clinical and genetic factors.
| Variable | Study group (n = 157) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univariate | Multivariate# | |||
| Cachectic (n = 74) | Non-cachectic (n = 83) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |
| Men | 40 (43.5%) | 52 (56.5%) | 0.70 (0.37–1.33) | 0.36 (0.12–1.12) |
| Women | 34 (52.3%) | 31 (47.7%) | 0.276 | 0.077 |
| ≥ 74 | 51 (63%) | 30 (37%) | 3.92 (2.01–7.62) | 3.55 (1.63–7.76) |
| < 74 | 23 (30.3%) | 53 (69.7%) | 0.0001* | 0.0015* |
| Smoker (current or ex) | 46 (45.5%) | 55 (54.5%) | 0.81 (0.42–1.56) | 0.87 (0.44–1.70) |
| Non-smoker (missing data: n = 1) | 28 (50.9%) | 27 (49.1%) | 0.522 | 0.454 |
| Yes | 33 (53.2%) | 29 (46.8%) | 1.47 (0.77–2.80) | 1.01 (0.41–2.46) |
| No (missing data: n = 1) | 41 (43.6%) | 53 (56.4%) | 0.2403 | 0.9849 |
| Yes | 38 (64.4%) | 21 (35.6%) | 3.07 (1.56–6.01) | 3.75 (1.52–9.26) |
| No (missing data: n = 1) | 36 (37.1%) | 61 (62.9%) | 0.0011* | 0.004* |
| II-IV | 58 (48.3%) | 62 (51.7%) | 1.24 (0.58–2.66) | 1.37 (0.40–4.54) |
| I (missing data: n = 2) | 15 (42.9%) | 20 (57.1%) | 0.568 | 0.615 |
| III-IV | 46 (61.3%) | 29 (38.7%) | 3.05 (1.58–5.89) | 2.83 (1.04–7.73) |
| I-II | 27 (34.2%) | 52 (65.8%) | 0.001* | 0.042* |
| IV | 24 (68.6%%) | 11 (31.4%) | 3.16 (1.42–7.04) | 1.63 (0.47–5.58) |
| I–III (missing data: n = 2) | 49 (40.8%) | 71 (59.2%) | 0.005* | 0.437 |
| B and C | 63 (75%) | 21 (25%) | 16.36 (7.27–36.81) | 19.01 (7.51–48.11) |
| A (missing data: n = 1) | 11 (15.5%) | 60 (84.5%) | < 0.0001* | < 0.0001* |
| C | 14 (93.3%) | 1 (6.7%) | 18.90 (2.42–147.71) | 2.90 (0.31–26.96) |
| A and B (missing data: n = 1) | 60 (42.6%) | 81 (57.4%) | 0.005* | 0.350 |
| AA | 42 (58.3%) | 30 (41.7%) | 2.13 (1.08–4.17) | 2.03 (1.01–4.06) |
| GA and GG (missing data: n = 17) | 27 (39.7%) | 41 (60.7%) | 0.029* | 0.048* |
| GG | 2 (25%) | 6 (75%) | 0.32 (0.06–1.66) | 0.35 (0.04–2.63) |
| AA and GA (missing data: n = 17) | 67 (50.8%) | 65 (49.2%) | 0.176 | 0.306 |
*Statistically significant results.
#In multivariate analysis, all statistically significant results from univariate analysis were included.