Literature DB >> 34635381

Cost-effectiveness and system-wide impact of using Hepatitis C-viremic donors for heart transplant.

Brian Wayda1, Alexander T Sandhu2, Justin Parizo2, Jeffrey J Teuteberg2, Kiran K Khush2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The advent of direct-acting antiviral therapy for Hepatitis C (HCV) has made using HCV-viremic donors a viable strategy to address the donor shortage in heart transplantation. We employed a large-scale simulation to evaluate the impact and cost-effectiveness of using HCV-viremic donors for heart transplant.
METHODS: We simulated detailed histories from time of listing until death for the real-world cohort of all adults listed for heart transplant in the United States from July 2014 to June 2019 (n = 19,346). This population was imputed using historical data and captures "real-world" heterogeneity in geographic and clinical characteristics. We estimated the impact of an intervention in which all candidates accept HCV+ potential donors (n = 472) on transplant volume, waitlist outcomes, and lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).
RESULTS: The intervention produced 232 more transplants, 132 fewer delistings due to deterioration, and 50 fewer waitlist deaths within this 5-year cohort and reduced wait times by 3% to 11% (varying by priority status). The intervention was cost-effective, adding an average of 0.08 QALYs per patient at a cost of $124 million ($81,892 per QALY). DAA therapy and HCV care combined account for 11% this cost, with the remainder due to higher costs of transplant procedures and routine post-transplant care. The impact on transplant volume varied by blood type and region and was correlated with donor-to-candidate ratio (ρ = 0.71).
CONCLUSIONS: Transplanting HCV+ donor hearts is likely to be cost-effective and improve waitlist outcomes, particularly in regions and subgroups experiencing high donor scarcity.
Copyright © 2021 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cost-effectiveness analysis; donor selection; health policy; heart transplantation; transplant allocation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34635381      PMCID: PMC8973316          DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  49 in total

1.  Quality of life of advanced chronic heart failure: medical care, mechanical circulatory support and transplantation.

Authors:  Akan Emin; Chris A Rogers; Nicholas R Banner
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.191

2.  Comparative survival and cost-effectiveness of advanced therapies for end-stage heart failure.

Authors:  Elisa F Long; Gary W Swain; Abeel A Mangi
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 8.790

3.  Use of hepatitis C-positive grafts in hepatitis C-negative liver transplant recipients is cost effective.

Authors:  Sammy Saab; Ani Kardashian; Satvir Saggi; Gina Choi; Vatche Agopian; Myron J Tong
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 2.863

4.  Cost-effectiveness of ventricular assist device use in the United Kingdom: results from the evaluation of ventricular assist device programme in the UK (EVAD-UK).

Authors:  Linda D Sharples; Matthew Dyer; Fay Cafferty; Nikolaos Demiris; Carol Freeman; Nicholas R Banner; Stephen R Large; Steven Tsui; Noreen Caine; Martin Buxton
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 10.247

5.  Canadian Real-World Experience of Using Sacubitril/Valsartan in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Insight From the PARASAIL Study.

Authors:  Haissam Haddad; Sebastien Bergeron; Andrew Ignaszewski; Gregory Searles; Driss Rochdi; Priyanka Dhage; Natacha Bastien
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2020-04-26

6.  Overall quality of life improves to similar levels after mechanical circulatory support regardless of severity of heart failure before implantation.

Authors:  Kathleen L Grady; David Naftel; Lynne Stevenson; Mary Amanda Dew; Gerdi Weidner; Francis D Pagani; James K Kirklin; Susan Myers; Timothy Baldwin; James Young
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 10.247

7.  Fifth INTERMACS annual report: risk factor analysis from more than 6,000 mechanical circulatory support patients.

Authors:  James K Kirklin; David C Naftel; Robert L Kormos; Lynne W Stevenson; Francis D Pagani; Marissa A Miller; J T Baldwin; J Timothy Baldwin; James B Young
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 10.247

8.  Utility estimates for decision-analytic modeling in chronic heart failure--health states based on New York Heart Association classes and number of rehospitalizations.

Authors:  Alexander Göhler; Benjamin P Geisler; Jennifer M Manne; Mikhail Kosiborod; Zefeng Zhang; William S Weintraub; John A Spertus; G Scott Gazelle; Uwe Siebert; David J Cohen
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 5.725

9.  Cost-effectiveness of using hepatitis C viremic hearts for transplantation into HCV-negative recipients.

Authors:  Cathy Logan; Ily Yumul; Javier Cepeda; Victor Pretorius; Eric Adler; Saima Aslam; Natasha K Martin
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  Trends in the use of hepatitis C viremic donor hearts.

Authors:  Selena S Li; Asishana Osho; Philicia Moonsamy; David A D'Alessandro; Gregory D Lewis; Mauricio A Villavicencio; Thoralf M Sundt; Masaki Funamoto
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 5.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.