Literature DB >> 34633830

Antibody Responses After SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination in Adults With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Gil Y Melmed1, Gregory J Botwin1, Kimia Sobhani2, Dalin Li1, John Prostko3, Jane Figueiredo4, Susan Cheng5, Jonathan Braun6, Dermot P B McGovern6.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34633830      PMCID: PMC8513793          DOI: 10.7326/M21-2483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


× No keyword cloud information.
Background: The effects of immunosuppression on responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine are unclear given that patients receiving immune-modifying therapies, who constitute 2.8% of commercially insured adults, were underrepresented in vaccine trials (1). Fewer than half of organ transplant recipients receiving antimetabolite therapies developed antibodies after 2 doses of mRNA vaccine (2). Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) receiving infliximab were less likely than those receiving vedolizumab to develop antibodies after 1 dose of BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford–AstraZeneca) vaccine (3), although other researchers have shown that seroconversion occurs in most patients with IBD after 2 doses of mRNA vaccine (4, 5). Objective: To contextualize these findings relative to nonimmunosuppressed persons by assessing responses after mRNA vaccination in adults with IBD receiving various medication regimens. Methods: We assessed antibody titers in adults with IBD who received mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination who were referred from 18 U.S. gastroenterology practices and a social media campaign (January to July 2021). Participants completed baseline surveys detailing medical history at the time of vaccination. Local participants at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center were offered antibody assessments after dose 1 (from 5 days after dose 1 until the day of dose 2); after dose 2 (from 2 to 13 days after dose 2); and at 2 weeks (14 to 29 days), 8 weeks (30 to 84 days), and 16 weeks (85 to 140 days) after dose 2; geographically distant participants were offered at-home sampling using Tasso-SST (Tasso) at 8 weeks. We analyzed plasma antibodies to the receptor-binding domain of the spike protein S1 subunit (IgG(S)) and to the viral nucleocapsid protein (IgG(N)) using the SARS-CoV-2 IgG-II and SARS-CoV-2 IgG assays, respectively (Abbott Labs). We defined an IgG(S) level of 50 AU/mL or higher as a positive result. Qualitatively positive responses were determined after dose 1, after dose 2, and after week 2 (14 to 140 days after dose 2). We excluded recipients of the Ad26.COV2 vaccine (Johnson & Johnson), those with prior COVID-19 defined by a positive IgG(N) result at any time point, and those who did not receive both mRNA doses. Participants provided electronic informed consent, and the Cedars-Sinai institutional review board approved the study. Geometric means and CIs were calculated for log-transformed antibody titers. Findings: The study included 582 participants (mean age, 44 years; 55% female) (Table); 342 (59%) received BNT162b2, and 240 (41%) received mRNA-1273 (Moderna). The proportions of participants receiving no immune suppression, anti-integrin therapy, anti–interleukin-12/23 therapy, immunomodulator monotherapy, anti–tumor necrosis factor monotherapy, Janus kinase inhibition, anti–tumor necrosis factor therapy combined with an immunomodulator, and systemic corticosteroids were 15.8%, 13.7%, 20.4%, 2.1%, 31.4%, 1.2%, 8.6%, and 6.0%, respectively. Those receiving systemic corticosteroids were included in the corticosteroids category regardless of concomitant medications. Four participants were missing medication data. We obtained 854 samples for antibody assessments from 582 participants, including 113 after the first dose, 89 after the second dose, 115 at 2 weeks, 366 at 8 weeks, and 171 at 16 weeks.
Table.

Participant Characteristics, Seropositivity, and GMTs, by Medication Class

Participant Characteristics, Seropositivity, and GMTs, by Medication Class Overall, 49% of participants had positive levels of antibodies after the first dose, 92% after the second dose, and 99% after week 2. Quantitative levels numerically increased from dose 1 to week 2 then decreased at subsequent time points. The Figure shows quantitative levels at week 8 by medication regimen.
Figure.

Week 8 anti-spike IgG (log10) levels, by medication class.

The dotted line represents the threshold for a positive antibody result (50 AU/mL [Abbott Labs]). IL = interleukin; JAK = Janus kinase; TNF = tumor necrosis factor-α.

Week 8 anti-spike IgG (log10) levels, by medication class.

The dotted line represents the threshold for a positive antibody result (50 AU/mL [Abbott Labs]). IL = interleukin; JAK = Janus kinase; TNF = tumor necrosis factor-α. Discussion: Our study has several important findings. First, 99% of participants had detectable antibodies after 2 weeks regardless of medication regimen. Second, quantitative levels peaked at week 2 and decreased across all groups over subsequent time points. Third, mean quantitative levels at 8 weeks were the highest in the “no immunosuppression” group, as well as among those treated with anti-integrin and anti–interleukin-12/23, and lowest among those treated with anti–tumor necrosis factor combination therapy or corticosteroids; however, our study was not powered to assess differences across medication subgroups. These findings showing seroconversion across medication groups are consistent with those seen in other IBD studies (4, 5). In contrast, transplant recipients have lower rates of seroconversion, likely related to B-cell–depleting medications and combined therapies. Whether biologic and small-molecule therapies accelerate waning of titers over time is not yet known, but our results may reassure patients receiving these medications that initial humoral responses to mRNA vaccines are generally robust. Limitations include lack of racial diversity and a tertiary center focus that may diminish generalizability. Further characterization of immunity over time may inform future vaccination strategies for patients with IBD receiving biologic and small-molecule therapies. Gil Y. Melmed, MD, MS Gregory J. Botwin, BS Inflammatory Bowel and Immunobiology Research Institute, Karsh Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles, California Kimia Sobhani, PhD Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles, California Dalin Li, PhD Inflammatory Bowel and Immunobiology Research Institute, Karsh Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles, California John Prostko, MS Applied Research and Technology, Abbott Diagnostics Abbott Park, Illinois Jane Figueiredo, PhD Department of Medicine and Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles, California Susan Cheng, MD, MMSc, MPH Departments of Medicine, Cardiology, and Biomedical Sciences and Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles, California Jonathan Braun, MD, PhD Dermot P.B. McGovern, MD, PhD Inflammatory Bowel and Immunobiology Research Institute, Karsh Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles, California
  28 in total

1.  Impact of BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccination on the Development of Short and Long-Term Vaccine-Related Adverse Events in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Multi-Center Prospective Study.

Authors:  Mohammad Shehab; Fatema Alrashed; Israa Abdullah; Ahmad Alfadhli; Hamad Ali; Mohamed Abu-Farha; Arshad Mohamed Channanath; Jehad Ahmed Abubaker; Fahd Al-Mulla
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-08

2.  Immunogenicity of BNT162b2 Vaccine Booster Dose in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Receiving Infliximab Combination Therapy: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Mohammad Shehab; Fatema Alrashed; Ahmad Alfadhli; Abdulwahab Alsayegh; Usama Aldallal; Mariam Alsayegh; Preethi Cherian; Irina Alkhair; Thangavel Alphonse Thanaraj; Arshad Channanath; Ali A Dashti; Anwar Albanaw; Hamad Ali; Mohamed Abu-Farha; Jehad Abubaker; Fahd Al-Mulla
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-04

3.  Use of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Antagonists Is Associated With Attenuated IgG Antibody Response Against SARS-CoV-2 in Vaccinated Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Authors:  Antonius T Otten; Arno R Bourgonje; Petra P Horinga; Hedwig H van der Meulen; Eleonora A M Festen; Hendrik M van Dullemen; Rinse K Weersma; Coretta C van Leer-Buter; Gerard Dijkstra; Marijn C Visschedijk
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 8.786

4.  Effectiveness and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Authors:  Emily Spiera; Ryan C Ungaro; Asher Kornbluth
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2022-03

5.  Accelerated waning of immunity to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.

Authors:  Roya M Dayam; Jaclyn C Law; Rogier L Goetgebuer; Gary Yc Chao; Kento T Abe; Mitchell Sutton; Naomi Finkelstein; Joanne M Stempak; Daniel Pereira; David Croitoru; Lily Acheampong; Saima Rizwan; Klaudia Rymaszewski; Raquel Milgrom; Darshini Ganatra; Nathalia V Batista; Melanie Girard; Irene Lau; Ryan Law; Michelle W Cheung; Bhavisha Rathod; Julia Kitaygorodsky; Reuben Samson; Queenie Hu; W Rod Hardy; Nigil Haroon; Robert D Inman; Vincent Piguet; Vinod Chandran; Mark S Silverberg; Anne-Claude Gingras; Tania H Watts
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2022-06-08

6.  Serological Response to BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccines in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease on Biologic Therapies.

Authors:  Mohammad Shehab; Fatema Alrashed; Ahmad Alfadhli; Khazna Alotaibi; Abdullah Alsahli; Hussain Mohammad; Preethi Cherian; Irina Al-Khairi; Thangavel Alphonse Thanaraj; Arshad Channanath; Hamad Ali; Mohamed Abu-Farha; Jehad Abubaker; Fahd Al-Mulla
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-13

7.  COVID-19 vaccine-induced antibody responses in immunosuppressed patients with inflammatory bowel disease (VIP): a multicentre, prospective, case-control study.

Authors:  James L Alexander; Nicholas A Kennedy; Hajir Ibraheim; Sulak Anandabaskaran; Aamir Saifuddin; Rocio Castro Seoane; Zhigang Liu; Rachel Nice; Claire Bewshea; Andrea D'Mello; Laura Constable; Gareth R Jones; Sharmili Balarajah; Francesca Fiorentino; Shaji Sebastian; Peter M Irving; Lucy C Hicks; Horace R T Williams; Alexandra J Kent; Rachel Linger; Miles Parkes; Klaartje Kok; Kamal V Patel; Julian P Teare; Daniel M Altmann; Rosemary J Boyton; James R Goodhand; Ailsa L Hart; Charlie W Lees; Tariq Ahmad; Nick Powell
Journal:  Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-02-04

Review 8.  Effectiveness and Durability of COVID-19 Vaccination in 9447 Patients With IBD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Anuraag Jena; Deepak James; Anupam K Singh; Usha Dutta; Shaji Sebastian; Vishal Sharma
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 13.576

9.  Humoral Immune Response in IBD Patients Three and Six Months after Vaccination with the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccines mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2.

Authors:  Richard Vollenberg; Phil-Robin Tepasse; Joachim Ewald Kühn; Marc Hennies; Markus Strauss; Florian Rennebaum; Tina Schomacher; Göran Boeckel; Eva Lorentzen; Arne Bokemeyer; Tobias Max Nowacki
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-01-13

10.  COVID-19 Vaccine Is Effective in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients and Is Not Associated With Disease Exacerbation.

Authors:  Raffi Lev-Tzion; Gili Focht; Rona Lujan; Adi Mendelovici; Chagit Friss; Shira Greenfeld; Revital Kariv; Amir Ben-Tov; Eran Matz; Daniel Nevo; Yuval Barak-Corren; Iris Dotan; Dan Turner
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 13.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.