Literature DB >> 34633764

Large-scale whole-exome sequencing association study identifies FOXH1 gene and sphingolipid metabolism pathway influencing major depressive disorder.

Wei Zhou1,2,3,4, Luan Chen3,4, Bixuan Jiang3,4, Yidan Sun3,4, Mo Li3,4, Hao Wu3,4, Na Zhang3,4, Xiaofang Sun1,2, Shengying Qin3,4.   

Abstract

In the present study, we performed an exome-wide investigation of the burden of rare disease-causing variants for major depressive disorder (MDD) using 16,702 samples from UK biobank. Gene-based association analysis and candidate gene prioritization analysis indicated that FOXH1 have significant association with MDD. In addition, sphingolipid metabolism pathway was found to be less enriched with rare disease-causing variants in the MDD group, suggesting that this gene set may be involved in the pathophysiology of MDD.
© 2021 The Authors. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  UK biobank; burden analysis; major depressive disorder; rare variants; whole-exome sequencing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34633764      PMCID: PMC8504519          DOI: 10.1111/cns.13733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther        ISSN: 1755-5930            Impact factor:   5.243


CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Major depressive disorder (MDD), the most common mental illness, is closely associated with physical and mental disability. Twin studies have shown that genetic factors are able to explain 30–40% of the variation in MDD. To date, genome‐wide association study (GWAS) has identified hundreds of susceptibility risk loci of MDD. However, studies of common genetic variations have estimated that the single genetic polymorphism (SNP)‐based heritability was only approximately 9–10%, reflecting a serious missing heritability problem. Large sample size and precise description of clinical phenotype are two key points in identification of credible loci of psychiatric disease. However, strict clinical phenotypic inclusion criteria tend to limit the scale of sample collection. Several studies of rare variants based on whole‐exome sequencing (WES) with small sample size have been conducted to explore the risk loci of MDD. , However, the contribution of rare variants to the risk of MDD is not completely understood. Hence, a rare variant‐based association study with larger sample size and more strictly defined MDD is necessary. In this study, we analyzed a cohort of 16,702 samples, including exomes data from 5,508 patients with MDD from UK biobank, which was released in October 2020. We defined and selected individuals who had both lifetime MDD and current MDD according to the descriptions of Cai et al. The basic characteristics of participants are shown in Data S1. Data acquisition was conducted based on the UK Biobank Application #34716. Written consent was acquired for all participants. The protocol of WES production and quality control (QC) we used had been described in Van Hout et al. Protein‐altering single nucleotide rare (MAF <1%) variants (including missense, splice site, stop gain, start loss, and stop loss) were retained to assess whether there were significant enrichment differences in these variants through gene‐based and set‐based analysis. Weighted recursive truncated negative‐binomial regression (RUNNER), a novel gene‐based analysis, was also used to detect additional genes that were associated with risk of MDD.  ToppGene, an online tool, was used to prioritize the significance of novel candidate genes from a reported MDD‐related genes list (Data S2). One thousand six hundred and four gene sets from Reactome V7.4 database and ten brain‐specific expression gene sets were selected to perform set‐based analysis. The threshold of significance of the association was defined as FDR p value = .05. Age was tested by means of the t test with normal distribution. Chi‐square test was performed to compare the frequency difference in sex, smoking status, usage of alcohol, and ethnicity between the MDD case group and controls by R version 4.1.0. In this study, there were no significant differences of distribution in age and sex between MDD group (N = 5508) and control group (N = 11,194), as shown in Data S1. Fifteen genes were found to be significantly associated with risk of MDD (Data S3). We discovered and prioritized 7 candidate causal genes of MDD, which were MAPK10, FOXH1, DLGAP3, ARID5B, ASXL2, and MED13 (Table 1). We also found that 4 gene sets were significantly associated with MDD (Table 2). In addition, the top gene set was found to be involved with sphingolipid metabolism (FDR p value = 1.76 × 10−4). Remarkably, the synonymous variants in genes from the significant gene set mentioned above did not appear to have significant association with MDD (Data S4).
TABLE 1

Results of the candidate genes prioritized by ToppGene

RankGeneSymbolGO: Molecular function scoreGO: Molecular function pValueGO: Biological process scoreGO: Biological process pValueGO: Cellular component scoreGO: Cellular component pValueDisease scoreDisease pValueAverage scoreOverall pValue
1 MAPK10 00.5077460.9950690.0447330.9713930.006390.4378130.0751360.4967331.1E−05
2 MEOX2 0.5983430.002130.9699530.0631290.5597240.0213010.7387340.0487990.4374230.000405
3 FOXH1 0.5983430.002130.9975410.0391170.2774420.03195200.549380.3516220.007687
4 DLGAP3 00.5077460.997670.0389230.9958070.0029050.9703530.0230440.3991890.009506
5 ARID5B 00.5077460.9968310.04027900.5255620.9908150.0182030.375920.014052
6 ASXL2 0.3402020.0067780.9998930.02343100.5255620.2341460.0937260.3159890.017739
7 MED13 00.5077460.8687560.08443100.5255620.7613320.0474440.316310.046889
8 SLC11A1 00.5077460.9999930.01762200.5255620.427690.075910.2612590.063128
9 CEP63 00.5077460.7527220.09895400.5255620.8522410.0391170.3407420.066611
10 NUP153 0.3402020.0067780.4807190.1210300.52556200.549380.252830.073663
11 NBEAL2 00.5077460.7989790.09508100.5255620.2418720.092370.2435640.109382
12 PITPNM3 00.50774600.5731990.6068830.02130100.549380.1794970.198996
13 ZNF469 00.50774600.57319900.5255620.9251160.0290470.1871580.232404
14 BRPF3 00.5077460.6853180.106700.525562−100.1934780.351954
15 KIFC2 00.50774600.57319900.525562−100.1847410.574996
16 KIAA1522 00.50774600.57319900.52556200.549380.1172130.578612
TABLE 2

Significant set‐based association result of rare (MAF <1%) damaging non‐synonymous variants from reactome database

GeneSetNo. of variantsCaseAltAllelesControlAltAllelesskatoskatofdr
Sphingolipid metabolism583186029.65E−070.000176
Aspartate and asparagine metabolism3331330.0003060.018544
ROS and RNS production in phagocytes262675210.0002790.018544
Epigenetic regulation of gene expression505169370.0007620.034681

skato: optimized sequence kernel association test.

Results of the candidate genes prioritized by ToppGene Significant set‐based association result of rare (MAF <1%) damaging non‐synonymous variants from reactome database skato: optimized sequence kernel association test. FOXH1 was a candidate risk gene of MDD that was identified by two burden analysis and candidate gene prioritization analysis in this study. FOXH1 encodes xenopus forkhead activin signal transducer‐1 and is highly expressed in the brain. FOXH1 plays an important role in TGF‐beta signaling pathways. It has been reported that TGF‐beta pathways modulated psychiatric disorders. Further, our results were in consistence with previous studies, which have shown that there were significant correlations between changes in sphingolipid metabolism and anxiety‐like behavior in female rates. Moreover, the result of set‐based analysis showed that genes in hypothalamus region were associated with MDD. In fact, hypothalamic‐pituitary‐adrenal (HPA) axis abnormalities play an important role in the associations of MDD risk. In conclusion, our study identified several candidate risk genes of MDD and the sphingolipid metabolism pathways were associated with MDD. While the anatomic substrate in MDD remains unclear, our findings provide important insight into the molecular basis of MDD. Data S1 Click here for additional data file. Data S2 Click here for additional data file. Data S3 Click here for additional data file. Data S4 Click here for additional data file.
  10 in total

1.  The epidemiology of major depressive episodes: results from the International Consortium of Psychiatric Epidemiology (ICPE) Surveys.

Authors:  Laura Andrade; Jorge J Caraveo-Anduaga; Patricia Berglund; Rob V Bijl; Ron De Graaf; Wilma Vollebergh; Eva Dragomirecka; Robert Kohn; Martin Keller; Ronald C Kessler; Norito Kawakami; Cengiz Kiliç; David Offord; T Bedirhan Ustun; Hans-Ulrich Wittchen
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.035

2.  A joint study of whole exome sequencing and structural MRI analysis in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Yamin Zhang; Mingli Li; Qiang Wang; Jacob Shujui Hsu; Wei Deng; Xiaohong Ma; Peiyan Ni; Liansheng Zhao; Yang Tian; Pak Chung Sham; Tao Li
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 7.723

3.  Elevated macrophage migration inhibitory factor and decreased transforming growth factor-beta levels in major depression--no influence of celecoxib treatment.

Authors:  R Musil; M J Schwarz; M Riedel; S Dehning; A Cerovecki; I Spellmann; V Arolt; N Müller
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 4.839

4.  Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies.

Authors:  Tinca J C Polderman; Beben Benyamin; Christiaan A de Leeuw; Patrick F Sullivan; Arjen van Bochoven; Peter M Visscher; Danielle Posthuma
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 5.  Neuroinflammation and depressive disorder: The role of the hypothalamus.

Authors:  Alena Cernackova; Zdenka Durackova; Jana Trebaticka; Boris Mravec
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 1.961

6.  Anxiety and Depression Are Related to Higher Activity of Sphingolipid Metabolizing Enzymes in the Rat Brain.

Authors:  Iulia Zoicas; Christiane Mühle; Anna K Schmidtner; Erich Gulbins; Inga D Neumann; Johannes Kornhuber
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-05-17       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  Minimal phenotyping yields genome-wide association signals of low specificity for major depression.

Authors:  Na Cai; Joana A Revez; Mark J Adams; Till F M Andlauer; Gerome Breen; Enda M Byrne; Toni-Kim Clarke; Andreas J Forstner; Hans J Grabe; Steven P Hamilton; Douglas F Levinson; Cathryn M Lewis; Glyn Lewis; Nicholas G Martin; Yuri Milaneschi; Ole Mors; Bertram Müller-Myhsok; Brenda W J H Penninx; Roy H Perlis; Giorgio Pistis; James B Potash; Martin Preisig; Jianxin Shi; Jordan W Smoller; Fabien Streit; Henning Tiemeier; Rudolf Uher; Sandra Van der Auwera; Alexander Viktorin; Myrna M Weissman; Kenneth S Kendler; Jonathan Flint
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Targeted exome sequencing identifies five novel loci at genome-wide significance for modulating antidepressant response in patients with major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Zhi Xu; Chunming Xie; Lu Xia; Yonggui Yuan; Hong Zhu; Xiaofa Huang; Caihua Li; Yu Tao; Xiaoxiao Qu; Fengyu Zhang; Zhijun Zhang
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 6.222

9.  Bi-ancestral depression GWAS in the Million Veteran Program and meta-analysis in >1.2 million individuals highlight new therapeutic directions.

Authors:  Daniel F Levey; Murray B Stein; Frank R Wendt; Gita A Pathak; Hang Zhou; Mihaela Aslan; Rachel Quaden; Kelly M Harrington; Yaira Z Nuñez; Cassie Overstreet; Krishnan Radhakrishnan; Gerard Sanacora; Andrew M McIntosh; Jingchunzi Shi; Suyash S Shringarpure; John Concato; Renato Polimanti; Joel Gelernter
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 28.771

10.  Exome sequencing and characterization of 49,960 individuals in the UK Biobank.

Authors:  Cristopher V Van Hout; Ioanna Tachmazidou; Joshua D Backman; Joshua D Hoffman; Daren Liu; Ashutosh K Pandey; Claudia Gonzaga-Jauregui; Shareef Khalid; Bin Ye; Nilanjana Banerjee; Alexander H Li; Colm O'Dushlaine; Anthony Marcketta; Jeffrey Staples; Claudia Schurmann; Alicia Hawes; Evan Maxwell; Leland Barnard; Alexander Lopez; John Penn; Lukas Habegger; Andrew L Blumenfeld; Xiaodong Bai; Sean O'Keeffe; Ashish Yadav; Kavita Praveen; Marcus Jones; William J Salerno; Wendy K Chung; Ida Surakka; Cristen J Willer; Kristian Hveem; Joseph B Leader; David J Carey; David H Ledbetter; Lon Cardon; George D Yancopoulos; Aris Economides; Giovanni Coppola; Alan R Shuldiner; Suganthi Balasubramanian; Michael Cantor; Matthew R Nelson; John Whittaker; Jeffrey G Reid; Jonathan Marchini; John D Overton; Robert A Scott; Gonçalo R Abecasis; Laura Yerges-Armstrong; Aris Baras
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 69.504

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Identification of putative genetic variants in major depressive disorder patients in Pakistan.

Authors:  Sarah Rizwan Qazi; Muhammad Irfan; Zoobia Ramzan; Muhammad Jahanzaib; Maleeha Zaman Khan; Mahrukh Nasir; Muhammad Shakeel; Ishtiaq Ahmad Khan
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 2.  Major Depressive Disorder: Existing Hypotheses about Pathophysiological Mechanisms and New Genetic Findings.

Authors:  Muhammad Kamran; Farhana Bibi; Asim Ur Rehman; Derek W Morris
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 4.141

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.